The Global Gateway and Central Asia: Toward an EU-led Post-New Silk Road (original) (raw)
Related papers
Engaging Central Asia: The European Union's New Strategy in the Heart of Eurasia
In July 2007, the European Union initiated a fundamentally new approach to the countries of Central Asia. The launch of the EU Strategy for Central Asia signals a qualitative shift in the Union’s relations with a region of the world that is of growing importance as a supplier of energy, is geographically situated in a politically sensitive area – between China, Russia, Iran, Afghanistan and the south Caucasus – and contains some of the most authoritarian political regimes in the world. In this volume, leading specialists from Europe, the United States and Central Asia explore the key challenges facing the European Union as it seeks to balance its policies between enhancing the Union’s energy, business and security interests in the region while strengthening social justice, democratisation efforts and the protection of human rights. With chapters devoted to the Union’s bilateral relations with Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan and to the vital issues of security and democratisation, ‘Engaging Central Asia’ provides the first comprehensive analysis of the EU’s strategic initiative in a part of the world that is fast emerging as one of the key regions of the 21st century.
THE EUROPEAN UNION IN CENTRAL ASIA: A ONE-DIMENSIONAL STRATEGY
By adopting ‘The EU and Central Asia: Strategy for a New Partnership’ in 2007, the European Union (EU) was supposed to implement a comprehensive strategy for Central Asia. Although the framework of the Strategy was broad in content, energy and transport links have been the outstanding priorities regarding EU strategic interests, namely, security and stability. The aim of this paper is to review and analyze EU’s engagement with the region by examining, the content of the EU strategy, especially the focus on energy. The analysis shows that although the EU presents a comprehensive strategy aiming at cooperation with a balanced bilateral and regional approach in several areas, there are problems with implementation because of its late entry into the region. Moreover, the focus on energy corresponds to neglect in other areas. This suggests that the EU strategy is designed to serve EU interests more than those of Central Asian states.
Implementation and review of the European Union - Central Asia Strategy
co-authored with Jos Boonstra The 2007 European Union (EU) Strategy for Central Asia was reviewed for the fourth time in 2015. Over the last eight years, the EU has successfully established several institutionalised mechanisms for strengthening relations and working with Central Asian governments, including an increased presence on the ground. Despite this, the EU’s engagement in Central Asia is one of limited to no impact. The region has become more unstable; forecast gas deliveries from the region to Europe have so far not materialised; trade is minimal with the exception of EU-Kazakhstan links, democracy is seen by the Central Asian regimes as a threat to their survival; corruption severely undermines economic development and siphons off much of the development aid; and the human rights situation has been backsliding.
The strategic partnership between the EU and central Asian countries
This article examined the relationships between the EU and Central Asia at the level of the partnership, their background, which were laid in the early 1990s and the dynamics at the beginning of the 21 st century. The economic interests of the EU in Central Asia based on the possibility of access to necessary energy resources of Central Asia and the development of trade-economic relations. Central Asia takes a significant place in world geopolitics now. Increased interest in the early 21 st century was a result of many factors such as: the need for energy resources of Central Asia, the region's proximity to Afghanistan and based on the possibility of creating a security belt, combatting new threats such as trafficking in drugs and arms, migration flows and organized crime. In this context, this article was an attempt to study the development of an EU strategy for Central Asia until the contemporary stage.
The Belt and Road Initiative and the Eurasian Economic Union: Exploring the “Greater Eurasian Partnership” , 2020
The Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) is a key partner in China’s Belt, and Road Initiative (BRI), since it comprises the majority of territories which the BRI’s overland route, the Silk Road Economic Belt, needs to traverse as it crosses Central Asia on the way to Europe. The goal of this article is to explore the BRI in the context of BRI–EAEU coordination. The first part of the analysis focusses on the ways the Eurasian Economic Commission delineates the “Greater Eurasian Partnership” and counterposes it against China and the BRI. Then, the article compares two sets of interpretations of the BRI and “Greater Eurasian Partnership” obtained from interviews with elites in Kazakhstan and Russia. The interviews indicate that the BRI has had a much more forceful impact on local elites than Russia’s idea of “Greater Eurasian Partnership.”
THE EU STRATEGY ON CENTRAL ASIA: To the successful implementation of the new Strategy
THE EU STRATEGY ON CENTRAL ASIA, 2020
The new EU Strategy towards Central Asia builds up on the past work and refl ects a critical reevaluation of what needs to be strengthened, what has to change, and what is to be salvaged from the previous document. The Strategy is an ambitious framework document outlining ten large areas of cooperation aligned along three blocks, all of which are united by a “cross-cutting priority” of promoting regional cooperation in Central Asia. Ambitious yet not unrealistic, the language of the Strategy stresses important new developments, relevant wider context and the comparative advantages that the EU brings to the partnership, while outlining a positively balanced framework of cooperation.
The impact of the intersection of the EU and Turkey´s interests on the new balance of power in Central Asia in 2022, 2022
The sanctions imposed against Russia have led to a re-routing of land transport routes from China to Europe via the Middle Corridor, including through Central Asia. In view of the obstacles to unlocking the transit potential of the region, a kind of symbiosis between Turkey and the European Union was envisaged in the first half of 2022, with Turkey forming the institutional framework for developing transport routes, and the EU investing in improving their quality. But as the study has shown, there is no clear division of scope between the parties, suggesting that their interests overlap. Nevertheless, over the past year the parties have been able to create a basis for growth in the transport of goods across the Middle Corridor. This, in turn, has influenced the formation of a new balance of power in Central Asia by the fact that Russia has partly lost its monopoly on transit of goods from China and energy from Central Asia to Europe. But indicators such as trade turnover and foreign direct investment against the background of the region's growing transport importance have not shown much change in Kazakhstan. For better quality just visit Heartland´s Linkedin account: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/impact-intersection-eu-turkeys-interests-%3FtrackingId=KinTuqYBnWXkJghYMMJbuw%253D%253D/?trackingId=KinTuqYBnWXkJghYMMJbuw%3D%3D