Teaching About Structural Obstacles to Students Who Overcame Them (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Limits of Critical Pedagogy: Teaching About Structural Obstacles to Students Who Overcame Them
This article focuses on efforts to critically analyze the social reproductive functions of schooling with a group of pre-service teachers in the US–Mexico border region, and on students’ reactions to these efforts. The students – all female, predominantly Mexican-American – had experienced both educational discrimination and academic success, and heavily invested in the dominant view of schooling as a meritocracy where individual talent and motivation regularly overcome structural obstacles. We argue that the students’ ideologies and experi- ences of class, gender, ethnicity, nationality, and language predisposed them to resist analysis of systemic inequalities in schools; we also examine the implica- tions of this resistance for their future success as teachers. We conclude with recommendations for balancing structural pessimism and strategic optimism in the classroom, and for bringing students’ personal and social histories to bear on the contradictions between schooling’s promise of social mobility and its tendency to reproduce social inequality.
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26: 346-68, 2013
Available as a pdf by request to jmheyman@utep.edu . This article focuses on efforts to critically analyze the social reproductive functions of schooling with a group of pre-service teachers in the US–Mexico border region, and on students’ reactions to these efforts. The students – all female, predominantly Mexican-American – had experienced both educational discrimination and academic success, and heavily invested in the dominant view of schooling as a meritocracy where individual talent and motivation regularly overcome structural obstacles. We argue that the students’ ideologies and experiences of class, gender, ethnicity, nationality, and language predisposed them to resist analysis of systemic inequalities in schools; we also examine the implications of this resistance for their future success as teachers. We conclude with recommendations for balancing structural pessimism and strategic optimism in the classroom, and for bringing students’ personal and social histories to bear on the contradictions between schooling’s promise of social mobility and its tendency to reproduce social inequality.
Oppression in Education and U.S. Society
Educators concerned with ways that United States institutions address issues related to race, gender and class, especially the maintenance of inequality and injustice, are participating in the development of postmodern explanations of education and society that emphasize the ways that subordinated groups describe their own experiences. These approaches contest the hegemony of received truth by demonstrating that the same institutions a society describes as democratic, pluralistic, open, and able to meet the material needs of its citizens, are experienced by many people as discriminatory and oppressive. But despite their challenge to hegemonic assumptions, postmodern approaches have limitations. While they expose examples of privilege and oppression, they are less successful at explaining the complex relationships within and between groups, the historical roots of privilege and oppression, their resiliency within societies, and their points of vulnerability. The concepts of privilege...
2020
This study examines new pedagogies that deconstruct oppression centering the academic analysis on the "experience of the oppressor". To assist privileged groups to move beyond zones of denial is a pedagogical transformation that builds social much needed in our society. It is essential that future educators and pedagogists challenge problematic social views and oppressive social constructs. In a world of growing number of Coxinhas and Trumpeans, a pedagogy of the oppressor, can move people from a naïve, conformist, or reformist consciousness to a collective consciousness for social transformation. Usually persons of same equal power, can be more effective confronting persons at the same power level.
Social Inequality and Teaching: 5-Part Blog Series
Social Inequality and Teaching in the Academy We live in an unequal world; these inequalities do not stop at the university classroom door. In this five-part blog series, I consider some ways unjust inequalities are (re)produced in the classroom. These inequalities affect the pedagogical relationship. Moreover, critically investigating them matters if the university is to be a site for challenging, not reproducing, social inequalities. Part I: Pedagogy is not (just) about technique Part II: The problems with the conscientious pedagogue Part III: The practical challenges of broadening the scholarly canon Part IV: As professors, we are not all equal before our students Part V: "Imagine Otherwise" -- Ways Forward