A More Versatile Route to Block Copolymers and Other Polymers of Complex Architecture by Living Radical Polymerization:  The RAFT Process (original) (raw)

Abstract

sparkles

AI

This paper presents a novel approach to the synthesis of block copolymers and complex polymer architectures using the RAFT (reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer) process. The RAFT process is highlighted for its exceptional versatility, enabling polymerization with a wide range of functional monomers and achieving low polydispersity (<1.2). The methodology demonstrates significant improvements over traditional polymerization techniques, making it applicable for a broader range of chemical systems and facilitating the creation of specialized materials with specific functionalities.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What are the compatibility limits of nitroxide-mediated polymerization in complex polymers?add

The research indicates that nitroxide-mediated polymerization is less effective for non-styrene systems, limiting its utility in diverse block copolymer production. Specifically, this method struggles with monomers possessing acid functionality, such as methacrylic acid.

How does RAFT polymerization improve block copolymer synthesis compared to traditional methods?add

RAFT polymerization allows for the synthesis of block copolymers with narrow polydispersity typically below 1.2. It exhibits compatibility with a wider range of functional monomers, including those with acid and hydroxy functionalities.

What characteristics enable the narrow polydispersity in RAFT polymerization products?add

The narrow polydispersity in RAFT products arises from the efficient transfer of the dithio compound, facilitating controlled radical polymerization. This allows for consistent molecular weight and functionality across polymer chains.

How does the order of monomer addition affect the synthesis of block copolymers?add

The paper reveals that when synthesizing a block copolymer with methacrylate and styrene, the methacrylate block should be prepared first to ensure favorable transfer constants. This order counteracts low leaving group ability from styryl- or acrylyl-propagating radicals.

What role do dithio compounds play in RAFT polymerization mechanisms?add

Dithio compounds act as reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer agents, providing living characteristics to the polymerization process. They facilitate the transition of the polymeric thiocarbonylthio compound by rapidly transforming into active polymer chains.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (24)

  1. References and Notes (1) The use of the adjective "living" to describe a radical polymerization which displays the attributes of a living polymerization is preferred over other terms that have been advocated in this context (e.g., "controlled", "living/con- trolled", "pseudo living", or "living polymerization with reversible deactivation"), even though some side reactions (radical-radical termination) must inevitably complicate the process.
  2. Colombani, D. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1997, 22, 1649. Matyjas- zewski, K. ACS Symp. Ser. 1998, 685, 2.
  3. Fukuda, T.; Terauchi, T.; Goto, A.; Tsujii, Y.; Miyamoto, T. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 3050. Li, I. Q.; Howell, B.; Koster, R. A.; Priddy, D. B. Polym. Bull. (Berlin) 1996, 37, 451.
  4. Bertin, D.; Boutevin, B. Polym. Bull. (Berlin) 1996, 37, 337. Schmidt-Naake, G.; Butz, S. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 1996, 17, 661. Kazmaier, P. M.; Daimon, K.; Georges, M. K.; Hamer, G. K.; Veregin, R. P. N. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 2228. Butz, S.; Baethge, H.; Schmidt-Naake, G. Macro- mol. Rapid Commun. 1997, 18, 1049.
  5. Yoshida, E.; Ishizone, T.; Hirao, A.; Nakahama, S.; Takata, T.; Endo, T. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 3119. Listigovers, N. A.; Georges, M. K.; Odell, P. G.; Keoshkerian, B. Macro- molecules 1996, 29, 8992. Li, I. Q.; Howell, B. A.; Dineen, M. T.; Lyons, J. W.; Meunier, D. M.; Smith, P. B.; Priddy, D. B. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 5195.
  6. Lokaj, J.; Vlcek, P.; Kriz, J. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 7644.
  7. Wang, J.-S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 7901. Percec, V.; Kim, H. J.; Barboiu, B. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 6702. Sawamoto, M.; Kamigaito, M. Trends Polym. Sci. 1996, 4, 371. Matyjaszewski, K. ACS Symp. Ser. 1998, 685, 258.
  8. Matyjaszewski, K.; Coca, S.; Nakagawa, Y.; Xia, J. Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1997, 76, 147.
  9. Le, T. P.; Moad, G.; Rizzardo, E.; Thang, S. H. PCT Int. Appl. WO 9801478 A1 980115.
  10. Chiefari, J.; Chong, Y. K.; Ercole, F.; Krstina, J.; Jeffery, J.; Le, T. P. T.; Mayadunne, R. T. A.; Meijs, G. F.; Moad, C. L.; Moad, G.; Rizzardo, E.; Thang, S. H. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 5559.
  11. Portions of this work were presented at the IUPAC World Polymer Congress, Gold Coast, Australia in July 1998. Thang, S. H.; Chong, Y. K.; Ercole, F.; Le, T. P. T.; Moad, G.; Rizzardo, E. In World Polymer Congress Preprints; RACI, Polymer Division: Brisbane, 1998; p 142.
  12. Synthesis of poly(methyl methacrylate-block-butyl meth- acrylate-block-methyl methacrylate). B block: A solution of AIBN (2.5 mg), n-butyl methacrylate (3.8 mL), 1,4-bis- (dithiobenzoylprop-2-yl)benzene (7) (93.5 mg) in benzene (1.2 mL) was placed in an ampule, and the contents were degassed, sealed, and heated at 60 °C for 16 h to give poly- (n-butyl methacrylate) (conversion, 49%). A block: A solu- tion of the above poly(n-butyl methacrylate) (300 mg; precipitated from methanol to remove residual initiator), AIBN (0.51 mg), and methyl methacrylate (0.75 mL) in benzene (0.25 mL) was degassed, sealed, and heated at 60 °C for 16 h to provide the triblock copolymer (conversion of methyl methacrylate, >95%). GPC data for these polymers are shown in Table 2 and Figure 1c.
  13. Synthesis of poly(benzyl methacrylate-block 2-(dimethyl- amino)ethyl methacrylate). A block: A solution of cumyl dithiobenzoate (1c) (2 g), azobis(isobutyronitrile) (101 mg) in benzyl methacrylate (15 mL), and benzene (5 mL) was degassed through three freeze-thaw-evacuate cycles, sealed under vacuum, and heated in a constant-temperature bath at 60 °C for 88 h. B block: A solution of dithiobenzoate- terminated poly(benzyl methacrylate) (0.4 g), azobis(isobu- tyronitrile) (4 mg), and 2-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethyl meth- acrylate (0.4 g) in ethyl acetate (2 mL) was degassed through three freeze-thaw-evacuate cycles, sealed under vacuum, and heated in a constant-temperature bath at 60 °C for 24 h. Removal of the solvent provided the diblock copolymer. Details of molecular weight are provide in Table 1 and Figure 1a.
  14. Moad, G.; Ercole, F.; Johnson, C. H.; Krstina, J.; Moad, C. L.; Rizzardo, E.; Spurling, T. H.; Thang, S. H.; Anderson, A. G. ACS Symp. Ser. 1998, 685, 332.
  15. diblock synthesis, this impurity may take the form of homopolymer, dibock copolymer, or triblock copolymer depending on the species involved and whether radical-radical termination occurs by combination or disproportionation.
  16. Kuchanov, S. I.; Olenin, A. V. Polym. Bull. (Berlin) 1992, 28, 449.
  17. Greszta, D.; Matyjaszewski, K. Polym. Prepr. (Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Polym. Chem.) 1996, 37 (1), 569.
  18. Greenley, R. Z. In Polymer Handbook, 3rd ed.; Brandup, J., Immergut, E. H., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1989; p II/153.
  19. MMA/BA (mole ratio, 1:0.91) copolymerization in benzene (33% v/v) in the presence of 1c (0.008 M) with AIBN initiator (0.002 M). At 22% conversion. M h n ) 16 800, M h w/M h n ) 1.08, and the cumulative [MMA]/[BA] ) 1:0.45 from 1 H NMR. At 93% conversion, M h n ) 75 400, M h w/M h n ) 1.21, and the cumulative [MMA]/[BA] ) 1:0.8.
  20. Jankova, K.; Chen, X.; Kops, J.; Batsberg, W. Macromol- ecules 1998, 31, 538.
  21. Chen, X.; Gao, B.; Kops, J.; Batsberg, W. Polymer 1998, 39, 911.
  22. Pascal, P.; Clouet, G.; Corpart, P.; Charmot, D. J. Macromol. Sci., Chem. 1995, A32, 1341.
  23. Nair, C. P. R.; Chaumont, P.; Clouet, G. J. Macromol. Sci., Chem. 1990, A27, 791. MA981472P
  24. 2074 Communications to the Editor Macromolecules, Vol. 32, No. 6, 1999