Effective approaches to improve the psychosocial work environment (original) (raw)
Related papers
Health impact of psychosocial hazards at work: an overview
2010
The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers' products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. The named authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this publication. Assessment of causality: Impact of psychosocial hazards and work-related stress on health 4.1 Psychological and social health 4.1.1 Burnout 4.1.2 Mental health-depression and other common mental disorders 4.1.3 Social and behavioural health 4.2 Physiological and physical health effects 4.2.1 Musculoskeletal disorders 4.2.2 Heart disease 4.2.3 Metabolic syndrome and diabetes 5. Extrapolation of health impact of psychosocial risks: Link with previous global burden of disease estimates 5.1 Psychosocial risks and heart disease 5.2 Psychosocial hazards and lower back pain 5.3 Psychosocial hazards and noise 6. Conclusions References We thank the following individuals for peer reviewing this document:
THE IMPACT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND PSYCHOSOCIAL RISKS ON A SAFE AND HEALTHY WORKPLACE
XIII International Symposium Engineering Management and Competitiveness 2023 (EMC 2023), 2023
The authors of this paper have endeavoured to highlight the importance of mental health and psychosocial risks for a safe and healthy workplace. Due to the challenges that modern businesses are facing, employees are increasingly experiencing effects such as anxiety, depression, burnout syndrome, stress, etc. Business productivity decline, poor interpersonal relationships within the company, an unsafe and unfavourable work environment, etc. are all consequences of a company's inadequate response to mental health and psychosocial risk issues. The International Organization for Standardization has recognized the significance of this issue and has developed standards in the field of occupational safety and health (ISO 45001, ISO 45003), as well as other standards that take into account psychosocial risks in the workplace (ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 22000, ISO 31000). The high-level structure (HLS) allows for an easier integration of the company's management system in practice.
New Avenues for Prevention of Work-Related Diseases Linked to Psychosocial Risks
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
The epidemic of psychosocial risks continues to increase and the COVID-19 pandemic has even worsened this threat on workers’ health. This inexorable and evidence-based rise seems to be impervious to the preventive strategies proposed for more than 40 years. Hypotheses are proposed to explain this serious problem that drastically impacts public health and the economy. The objectives of this paper are to present, in this broad context of societal and cultural changes, how the present shift in management paradigms may represent opportunities to reduce work-related diseases. In the first part of this paper, we will summarize the situation on three main issues and their relation with psychosocial risks: (1) evolution of the occupational safety and health field, (2) change in the nature of work, and (3) emerging models of governance. In the second part, we will describe, through a few examples (among many others), how emerging models of corporate governance may reduce and prevent stress a...
Psychosocial Workplace Hazards and Workers' Health in Factory Sector
International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 2018
Nowadays, issues on psychosocial workplace hazards have become a hot topic. However, only a small amount of research has been conducted in Malaysia. The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between psychosocial workplace hazards and workers’ health which is measured using Body Mass Index (BMI) as well as mental health. Two research hypotheses related to psychosocial workplace hazards, i.e. Body Mass Index (BMI) and mental health were examined. In this study, 105 workers were selected randomly from factories located in Klang, Selangor, and questionnaires were distributed to them. The result revealed that there is a significant relationship between psychosocial workplace hazards and BMI, while there is no significant relationship between psychosocial workplace hazards and mental health. This study serves as a guideline for organisations concerning the relationship between psychosocial workplace hazards with workers’ health.
Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2011
Psychosocial safety climate (PSC) is defined as shared perceptions of organizational policies, practices and procedures for the protection of worker psychological health and safety, that stem largely from management practices. PSC theory extends the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) framework and proposes that organizational level PSC determines work conditions and subsequently, psychological health problems and work engagement. Our sample was derived from the Australian Workplace Barometer project and comprised 30 organizations, and 220 employees. As expected, hierarchical linear modeling showed that organizational PSC was negatively associated with workplace bullying and harassment (demands) and in turn psychological health problems (health impairment path). PSC was also positively associated with work rewards (resources) and in turn work engagement (motivational path). Accordingly, we found that PSC triggered both the health impairment and motivational pathways, thus justifying extending the JD-R model in a multilevel way. Further we found that PSC, as an organization-based resource, moderated the positive relationship between bullying/harassment and psychological health problems, and the negative relationship between bullying/harassment and engagement. The findings provide evidence for a multilevel model of PSC as a lead indicator of workplace psychosocial hazards (high demands, low resources), psychological health and employee engagement, and as a potential moderator of psychosocial hazard effects. PSC is therefore an efficient target for primary and secondary intervention.
Psychosocial risks in the working environment
The following explanations are based on the central reference points and results of the basic research project on psychosocial risks in the world of work, which was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). The aim of this project was to develop a formative risk assessment of psychosocial risks in the world of work with a special focus on the dynamic interdependencies between gainful employment and care work as well as structural work stress and subjectively perceived work stress. The result of this project is a theoretical-generic model of a formative risk assessment, which can be specifically configured for different stakeholder groups and was operationalized as a psychotherapeutic medical product via the Innosuisse project "SELBA" (Self Recognize, Understand, Change and Monitor Work Stresses and Strains).