Healthcare Informatics Research's Journey of Paving the Road to Excellence in Global Healthcare Informatics (original) (raw)
Related papers
Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008
This paper compares the h-indices of a list of highly-cited Israeli researchers based on citations counts retrieved from the Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar respectively. In several case the results obtained through Google Scholar are considerably different from the results based on the Web of Science and Scopus. Data cleansing is discussed extensively.
Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2017
The International Academy of Health Sciences Informatics (IAHSI) is established by International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) which is the world body for health and biomedical informatics. The Academy will serve as an honor society that recognizes expertise in biomedical and health informatics internationally. Academy membership will be one of the highest honors in the international field of biomedical and health informatics. To present scientometric analysis of founding members of the International Academy of Health Sciences Informatics, to evaluate members and their scientific rating. The work has an analytical character and presents analysis of the data obtained from the Google Scholar and Scopus database. Results are shown through number of cases, percentage and graphically. The analysis showed a significant correlation between the Academy and the country (continent) of origin of the academician. In IAHSI are mainly represented academics originating from Europe - 40 me...
Comparison Of The H-Index Of Researchers Of Google Scholar And Scopus
2018
H-index has been widely used as a performance indicator of researchers around the world especially in Indonesia. The Government uses Scopus and Google scholar as indexing references in providing recognition and appreciation. However, those two indexing services yield to different H-index values. For that purpose, this paper evaluates the difference of the H-index from those services. Researchers indexed by Webometrics, are used as reference's data in this paper. Currently, Webometrics only uses H-index from Google Scholar. This paper observed and compared corresponding researchers' data from Scopus to get their H-index score. Subsequently, some researchers with huge differences in score are observed in more detail on their paper's publisher. This paper shows that the H-index of researchers in Google Scholar is approximately 2.45 times of their Scopus H-Index. Most difference exists due to the existence of uncertified publishers, which is considered in Google Scholar but ...
Health information and libraries journal, 2016
We investigated the inter-rater reliability of Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus when calculating the h-index of 25 senior scientists in the Clinical Epidemiology Program of the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Bibliometric information and the h-indices for the subjects were computed by four raters using the automatic calculators in WoS and Scopus. Correlation and agreement between ratings was assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient and a Bland-Altman plot, respectively. Data could not be gathered from Google Scholar due to feasibility constraints. The Spearman's rank correlation between the h-index of scientists calculated with WoS was 0.81 (95% CI 0.72-0.92) and with Scopus was 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.99). The Bland-Altman plot showed no significant rater bias in WoS and Scopus; however, the agreement between ratings is higher in Scopus compared to WoS. Our results showed a stronger relationship and increased agreement between raters when calculating the h-index of ...
SJR and SNIP: two new journal metrics in Elsevier's Scopus
2010
Journal citation measures were originally developed as tools in the study of the scientific-scholarly communication system 1,2. But soon they found their way into journal management by publishers and editors, and into library collection management, and then into broader use in research management and the assessment of research performance. Typical questions addressed with journal citation measures in all these domains are listed in Table 1. Table 1 also presents important points that users of journal citation measures should take into account. Many authors have underlined the need to correct for differences in citation characteristics between subject fields, so that users can be sure that differences are due only to citation impact and
Comparing the Citations Counts and Altmetrics of the Top Medical Science Journals in Scopus
2019
Early altmetric investigations have focused on measuring the correlations between citation and altmetrics to partially validate the new metrics articles (Thelwall, Haustein, Lariviere, & Sugimoto, 2013; Priem, & Hemminger, 2010; Costas, Zahedi, & Wouters, 2014). The main aim of this research is to study the relationship between citation count indicator and almetrics or the new metrics in social -web of medical sciences journals. Present research is an applied research and the method used for doing it, is descriptive from correlation type which test relationship between citation count indicators and almetrics or the new metrics in social web. 111 medical sciences journals which have the highest SJR in Scopus databases were selected as research population from Scimago Journal Ranking (SJR) 2013-2014. Altmetrics—alternative metrics usually based on data from the social web which could be seen as a particularly promising approach in efforts to find appropriate measures for assessing Med...
The Modified h-Index of Scopus: A New Way in Fair Scientometrics
Publishing Research Quarterly, 2018
The h-index of Scopus is used as an important and practical instrument in analyzing the scientific level of researchers. In this research, 6 effective items (including author's order, quality of publication source, quality of citation source, type of citation, research scopes of the authors and the regular scope of citation source) were considered in order to increase the accuracy and equity of research and also the optimization of scientometrics. In order to find the actual impact of each item, a relation with a default coefficient was considered, and all effective items were presented after evaluating the influence of them on the desired coefficients. Here, the introduced effective factors were separately investigated for 20 Iranian authors who are randomly selected. The analysis of the results showed that by applying the effective factors, the h-index of authors was obtained on the basis of real and scientific criteria; thus, the mean of all effective factors is introduced as modified h-index. Among considered authors, the lowest reduction in h-index was 10.67% and the highest reduction was 37.25% (SD was 6.5). This reduction was obtained in comparison with their h-index of Scopus, and it demonstrates that the authors, who have less reduction in their h-index value, have more scientific and honest approach to research.