The Informal Economy of Credit in Early Modern Venice (original) (raw)
Related papers
Financing in Europe. Evolution, Coexistence and Complementarity of Lending Practices from the Middle Ages to Modern Times, ed. by D. Coffman, C. Lorandini, M. Lorenzini. London: Palgrave, 2018
This chapter analyses how merchants and political institutions cope with failures and defaults that compromise credit relationships in an early modern trading center. Focussing on the structure of financing business and trade in Venice and on the legal framework that protects creditors, the essay links the widespread form of trading company (the temporary partnership) to the large recourse to arbitration procedures for solving disputes, and to the lesser efficiency of institutional and legal frameworks traditionally securing credit rights in Venice. ‘Credit, Defaults and Institutions in Early Modern Venice’ concludes with the hypothesis that the changing commercial environment and the spread of temporary societies reduce the protective strenght of Venetian institutions and increase instability in financing international trade.
Credit and Poverty in Early Modern Venice
The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (2022) 52 (4): 513–536., 2022
In early modern Venice, wine and money were intrinsically linked through the pawnbroking service that innkeepers and bastioneri, the managers of wine warehouses (bastioni), offered their customers. The loans that they supplied were generally small, officially interest-free, and frequent. Moreover, at least one-third of each was paid in wine, at that time considered a staple. Hence, innkeepers and bastioneri were central figures in Venice’s urban context, especially for the poor. Those individuals, usually considered “voiceless” in history were, in fact, the main actors in what might be termed a “handkerchief” economy, named for one of its most pawned items.
The fortunes and misfortunes of Shylock and Antonio are pervaded with economic and legal ideas. Both characters tend to overlap and confuse in several dimensions–the most celebrated one is to believe that the Jew is the merchant–and are alternatively victim and victimizer. The analysis of the play focusing in money and contract, economics and the law, market and morality, allows us to delve into the nuances of one of the most engaging characters in the history of literature and to ponder the classical liberal message of justice and charity
Notarial Credit in Eighteenth-Century Trentino: Dynamics and Trends
2015
This paper investigates the informal credit market in Trentino in the second half of the eighteenth century by drawing upon notaries' loan contracts. The analysis focuses on four benchmark years: 1750, 1760, 1770, and 1780. More than 10,000 contracts from the period were examined, including 1,200 credit transactions registered in two different cities, Trent and Rovereto. The research aims to analyze dynamics and trends, as well as the mechanisms that characterize the two credit markets, specifically who the borrowers and the lenders were, what capital was borrowed for, and at what price. The findings show stark differences between the two cities' financial markets. In Trent, whose population amounted to some 9,000, credit activity accounted for 7.7% of all notarial transactions, whereas in nearby Rovereto, with about half that population, credit contracts represented twice as much, 15% of business. Likewise, capital flow reflects the different nature and dynamism of the two ...
«Contracts damned by God and by the World». Litigating the just price in seventeenth century Venice
Quaderni Storici, 2020
The records of the Office of the Piovego enable analysis of how the just price was litigated in seventeenth-century Venice. The evidence shows that Venetians adhered to the general moral principle that the just price should be determined collectively, rather than being a matter for individuals, with litigants attempting to establish the customary rate in any particular sector. The main exception to this was barter, an alternative mode of exchange that was regarded with suspicion due to its links with usury. Nevertheless, the lack of standardized procedure meant that in practice the determination of the just price was dependent upon the initiative of the parties. The flexible application of legal rules helped the court to find solutions appropriate for particular sectors, in line with its equitable approach to justice. But this also meant that getting results meant being able to mobilize resources to prove a case. In practice, the court functioned as a resource in the process of debt negotiation that could be instrumentalized by litigants to suit their own purposes.