Rhodesia's War of Numbers: Racial Populations, Political Power, and the Collapse of the Settler State, 1960-1979 (original) (raw)
Related papers
This article analyses the role of ethnic chauvinism in determining the patterns and trends of white immigration into Rhodesia from the country's occupation in 1890 to the Second World War. It argues that, while scholars have rightly emphasised white settler racism and discrimination against the African majority, and have tended to treat settler white society as a homogenous entity which shared a common identity, a closer examination of the racial dynamics within white colonial society reveals that strong currents of ethnic chauvinism maintained sharp divisions within the white settler society, even though settlers presented a united front when protecting their collective interests in the face of the perceived African threat. This article focuses specifically on racial and cultural chauvinism emanating from settlers of British stock which, among other things, determined the pace, volume and nature of white immigration into the country and contributed, together with other factors, to the fact that fewer white immigrants entered the country than had originally been envisaged by Cecil John Rhodes. Thus, while Rhodes had dreamt of creating Rhodesia as a white man's country, this dream remained unfulfilled because of the dominant British settler community's reluctance to admit whites of non-British stock. It is argued, therefore, that, throughout the period under study, British colonial settlers continued to regard themselves as "more white than others" with respect to other non-British races.
Zambezia: The Journal of Humanities of the University of Zimbabwe., 2000
This article analyses the role of ethnic chauvinism in determining the patterns and trends of white immigration into Rhodesia from the country's occupation in 1890 to the Second World War. It argues that, while scholars have rightly emphasised white settler racism and discrimination against the African majority, and have tended to treat settler white society as a homogenous entity which shared a common identity, a closer examination of the racial dynamics within white colonial society reveals that strong currents of ethnic chauvinism maintained sharp divisions within the white settler society, even though settlers presented a united front when protecting their collective interests in the face of the perceived African threat. This article focuses specifically on racial and cultural chauvinism emanating from settlers of British stock which, among other things, determined the pace, volume and nature of white immigration into the country and contributed, together with other factors, to the fact that fewer white immigrants entered the country than had originally been envisaged by Cecil John Rhodes. Thus, while Rhodes had dreamt of creating Rhodesia as a white man's country, this dream remained unfulfilled because of the dominant British settler community's reluctance to admit whites of non-British stock. It is argued, therefore, that, throughout the period under study, British colonial settlers continued to regard themselves as "more white than others" with respect to other non-British races.
How race and law influenced activities in Northern Rhodesia
African Identities, 2019
The following paper aims at highlighting how race and law influenced activities between Europeans and Africans in Northern Rhodesia. Race and Law were crucial determinants in how activities functioned in social relations, economic activities, trade unions and political party activities, and in the education sector. It advances that the British South African Company (BSAC) and later the colonial administration used the two aspects to the advantage of the European settlers which was at the expense of the livelihoods of the inhabitants, the Africans. It goes in details by showing what laws were enacted to advance European activities, and how race was instrumental in maintaining European control of Africans in Northern Rhodesia. This paper touches on activities that took place between 1890 to 1960.
Once the dust of Africa is in your blood: tracking Northern Rhodesia’s white diaspora
Northern Rhodesia isn’t just a place that postcolonialism forgot, it is a place colonialism chose not to remember. Unlike more glamorized imperial possessions, it produced little colonial fiction, memoir, or travelogue. The white population that departed after Independence now has only fragmented individual memory to draw upon, but aging people are now forging collective memory to recuperate their past. This is a work of autoethnography examining attachment to and detachment from a former colony.
This article looks at how the Rhodesian regime and its friends abroad used certain types of temporalizing rhetoric to define and defend Rhodesia’s UDI to overseas audiences. Supporters of UDI inside and outside Africa played with the differences between calendric and civilizational time in order to metaphorically place Rhodesians, white and black, back in time. It allowed them to situate white settlers enough ahead of Africans on a civilizational time scale to justify white supremacy, yet enough behind the modern West to have reduced culpability for that very same white supremacy. This was done to appeal to the sympathies of certain Western audiences, in particular conservative Americans. The use of these metaphors provide insight into Rhodesia's self-image as a settler state, and how defenders of UDI wanted the Rhodesian settler project to be seen in the West.