On the (im)possibility of dialogue in the age of propaganda (original) (raw)
Related papers
Thoughts from Russia - breaking the "clash of epistemologies"
It’s important to remind ourselves that beyond ideological conflicts between socialism and capitalism, people share aspirations for peace and concerns for the future. "The demonization of Russia is, I believe, one of the most dangerous things that is happening in our world today.” The anti-Russia perception — the assumption that Russia is “evil” — is most unfortunate. Peace depends on breaking the “clash of epistemologies. ” In the highly militarized, dangerous world we share, it is important to humanize rather than demonize one another. We need to find ways to nurture cooperation, and achieve goodwill and fraternity with Russia. Sadly, contemporary international relations have become a game of brinkmanship. We are witnessing a major geopolitical shift. It appears that neither Russia nor the United States seem to be afraid of nuclear weapons. We are at a crossroad of history where rule-based, multilateral cooperation is at stake.
Why Propaganda Survives in the 21st Century: Eight Points about Russian Propaganda
Media@LSE blog, 2022
Estimated reading time: 5 minutes More than 100 days after Russia invaded Ukraine, King's College London's Gregory Asmolov argues that the power of Russian propaganda to prevent any serious opposition from within Russian society remains a key aspect in understanding this ongoing war. Russian propaganda has become one of the core topics on the agenda since the beginning of Russian aggression against Ukraine in February 2022. It seems that Russia lost the information war in the global information space (or has not even tried to win it there, despite the 22/06/2022, 12:45
Applied Aspects of Russian Political Discourse
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 2014
The article presents a comparative analysis of the communicative element in the activities of Russian political parties in the beginning of the XX century and up to the present day. The methodological basis for the conceptual comparison is the similarity of objectives that the state and society face in the historical moments of radical changes of political systems. The epistemological toolkit is the conceptual construct of modern political science, modern research of the American, European and Russian researchers. The empirical base of the study is, respectively: the activities of the most influential political organizations of Russia at the beginning of the last century-the Constitutional Democratic Party (Party of People's Freedom) and the leading party of modern Russia-the "United Russia". The purpose of the article is to show the increasing importance of political communication in the changing world. The applied relevance of the article is justified by the new challenges that the contemporary Russian politics faces now. The analysis brings about the following conclusions: 1) communication is the most important strategy of the party organization; 2) a political party, irrespective of whether it is the opposition or the ruling party, should pursue a responsible policy based on constant interaction with the society and 3) in the absence of such communication, the party, despite a temporary electoral success, can expect a political defeat in the future. The theoretical conclusions are focused on the empirical explanation of strategies of modern political parties to predict their electoral prospects.
Prisoners of Their Own Propaganda Russian Narratives Projected into the 'Near Abroad'
2020
Promoting propaganda narratives has become an important part of Moscow’s foreign policy toolbox. While their immediate goal may be to confuse foreign audiences, these narratives are ultimately rooted in a particular worldview, that is, in fact, shared by many Russians. Therefore, we should not underestimate the extent to which the Kremlin and its supporters may actually be prisoners of their own propaganda.
The Russian Federation Propaganda Narratives
Torun International Studies
The article seeks to research the propaganda narratives of the Russian Federation in Europe. The Russian Federation has a long “successful” history of creating propaganda narratives since Soviet times. Even today, it spreads national and grand narratives to influence the external and internal audience. The narrative method is used to analyse both the content and the structure of the stories. The author makes the conclusion that the main purpose of Russia’s propaganda narratives is to convince its citizens and the whole world of Russia’s indomitable greatness and power, as well as to demonstrate the degradation of Europe and the West in general. To form the image of an invincible fighter for Christian values, the only outpost of stability, development, security (at least in Europe), Russia promotes a grand narrative, which is disseminated through daily disinformation, fakes and propaganda messages. The article finds out how the EU counteracts these destructive influences, specificall...
Psychology of Language and Communication, 2013
Discourse in this paper is represented by the totality of texts (Koller, 2004, p. 18) covering events in former Soviet republics such as Ukraine, Georgia and the Baltic countries. Over 100 texts have been collected from the most popular Russian newspapers, Argumenty i Fakty and Komsomol’skaia Pravda, between 2004 and 2010 in order to compile a “discourse of Russian satellites.” Even though the contemporary Russian press avoids the totalitarian habits of Soviet times such as monoglossia, dysphemisms (language of insults), sanctions and social commands, it still attempts to exercise control over the formation of readers’ opinions. The Russian press tries to channel the reaction of their audience toward disapproval of independent nations. The objective of this article is to summarize those narrative techniques which generate negative responses toward sovereign countries of the former Soviet Union. These techniques, which are called “strategies for discrediting opponents,” include sourc...
Ideas, Ideology & Intellectuals in Search of Russia's Political Future
Daedalus, 2017
The intellectual discourse of any state can function within two broad paradigms: consensual and pluralistic. In the first case, political elites, intellectuals, and the public agree on the base parameters of what constitutes "the good life" and argue about the methods of application. In the second case, participants hold radically different, incommensurable views, which coexist in society. This essay argues that the Western political system broadly rests on the politics of liberal consensus, formed throughout the period of capitalist modernization. But Russia's history took a different turn, following a path of alternative modernization. This engendered the politics of paradigmatic pluralism, in which a number of radically different politico-intellectual frameworks struggle for the dominant discourse. This essay examines these paradigms and argues that, due to the nature and substance of these models, fundamental change of Russia's dominant discourse, along with its main politico-institutional parameters, is unlikely.