A phoneme effect in visual word recognition (original) (raw)

Abstract

In alphabetic writing systems like English or French, many words are composed of more letters than phonemes (e.g. BEACH is composed of five letters and three phonemes, i.e. /biJ/). This is due to the presence of higher order graphemes, that is, groups of letters that map into a single phoneme (e.g. EA and CH in BEACH map into the single phonemes /i/ and /J/, respectively). The present study investigated the potential role of these subsyllabic components for the visual recognition of words in a perceptual identification task. In Experiment 1, we manipulated the number of phonemes in monosyllabic, low frequency, five-letter, English words, and found that identification times were longer for words with a small number of phonemes than for words with a large number of phonemes. In Experiment 2, this 'phoneme effect' was replicated in French for low frequency, but not for high frequency, monosyllabic words. These results suggest that subsyllabic components, also referred to as functional orthographic units, play a crucial role as elementary building blocks of visual word recognition.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (40)

  1. Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., van Rijn, H., 1993. The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  2. Berndt, R.S., Lynne D'Autrechy, C., Reggia, J.A., 1994. Functional pronunciation units in English words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory and Cognition 20, 977-991.
  3. Berndt, R.S., Reggia, J.A., Mitchum, C.C., 1987. Empirically derived probabilities for grapheme-to- phoneme correspondences in English. Behavior Research Methods: Instruments and Computers 19, 1-9.
  4. Bowey, J.A., 1990. Orthographic onsets and rimes as functional units of reading. Memory and Cognition 18, 419-427.
  5. Bowey, J.A., 1993. Orthographic rime priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 46A, 247-271.
  6. Brown, G.D.A., Watson, F.L., 1994. Spelling-to-sound effect in single word reading. British Journal of Psychology 85, 181-202.
  7. Coltheart, M., 1978. Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In: Underwood, G. (Ed.), Strategies of Information Processing. Academic Press, London.
  8. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., Haller, H., 1993. Models of reading aloud: dual-route and parallel- distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review 100, 589-608.
  9. Content, A., 1991. The effect of spelling-to-sound regularity on naming in French. Psychological Research 53, 3-12.
  10. Content, A., Mousty, P., Radeau, M., 1990. BRULEX: Une base de donne ´es lexicales informatise ´e pour le Franc ¸ais e ´crit et parle ´. L'Anne ´e Psychologique 90, 551-566.
  11. Derouesne, J., Beauvois, M.F., 1979. Phonological processing in reading: data from alexia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 42, 1125-1132.
  12. Ferrand, L., Segui, J., Grainger, J., 1996. Masked priming of words and picture naming: the role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language 35, 708-723.
  13. Ferrand, L., Segui, J., Humphreys, G.W., 1996. The syllable's role in word naming. Memory and Cognition 25, 458-470.
  14. Feustel, T.L., Shiffrin, R.M., Salasoo, A., 1983. Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 112, 309-346.
  15. Gibson, E.J., Pick, A.D., Osser, H., Hammond, M., 1962. The role of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in the perception of words. American Journal of Psychology 75, 554-570.
  16. Grainger, J., Segui, J., 1990. Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: a comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception and Psychophysics 47, 191-198.
  17. Henderson, L., 1985. On the use of the term "grapheme". Language and Cognitive Processes 2, 135- 148.
  18. Jacobs, A.M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J.C., Grainger, J., 1998. MROM-P: an interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In: Grainger, J., Jacobs, A.M. (Eds.), Localist Connectionist Approaches to Human Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 147-188.
  19. Jakobson, R., Fant, M., Halle, M., 1952. Le Concept de Trait Distinctif. Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  20. Laberge, D., Samuel, S.J., 1974. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cog- nitive Psychology 6, 293-323.
  21. Peereman, R., Content, A., 1997. Orthographic and phonological neighborhood in naming: not all neigh- bors are equally influential in orthographic space. Journal of Memory and Language 37, 382-410.
  22. Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R., Rho, S., 1986. How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language 25, 461-475.
  23. Rapp, B.C., 1992. The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: the bigram trough hypothesis examined. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 33-53.
  24. Rastle, K. and Coltheart, M., 1998. Whammy and double whammy: length effects in nonword naming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5, 277-282.
  25. Rey, A., Jacobs, A.M., Chesnet, D., Bijeljac-Babic, R., Grainger, J., submitted. LIP: a luminance increas- ing procedure. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers.
  26. Snodgrass, J.G., Poster, M., 1992. Visual-word recognition thresholds for screen-fragmented names of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 24, 1- 15.
  27. Spoehr, K.T., Smith, E.E., 1973. The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology 5, 71-89.
  28. Taft, M., 1979. Lexical access via an orthographic code: the basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 21-39.
  29. Treiman, R., 1989. The internal structure of the syllable. In: Carlson, G., Tanenhaus, M. (Eds.), Linguistic Structure in Language Processing. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
  30. Treiman, R., Chafetz, J., 1987. Are there onset-and rime-like units in written words? In: Coltheart, M. (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII. Erlbaum, London.
  31. Treiman, R., Goswami, U., Bruck, M., 1990. Not all words are alike: implications for reading develop- ment and theory. Memory and Cognition 18, 559-567.
  32. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., Richmond-Welty, E.D., 1995. The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General 124, 107-136.
  33. Treiman, R., Zukowski, A., 1988. Units in reading and spelling. Journal of Memory and Language 27, 466-477.
  34. Venezky, R.L., 1970. The Structure of English Orthography. Mouton, The Hague. B79
  35. A. Rey et al. / Cognition 68 (1998) B71-B80
  36. Voker, J.R., Baker, J.G., Hayman, G., Jacoby, L.L., 1986. Perceptual identification of visually degraded stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 18, 1-9.
  37. Waters, G.S., Seidenberg, M.S., 1985. Spelling-sound effects in reading: time course and decision criteria. Memory and Cognition 13, 557-572.
  38. Wise, B.W., Olson, R.K., Treiman, R., 1990. Subsyllabic units in computerized reading instruction: onset- rime vs. postvowel segmentation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 49, 1-19.
  39. Ziegler, J., Rey, A., Jacobs, A.M., 1998. Simulating individual word identification thresholds and errors in the fragmentation task. Memory and Cognition 26, 490-501.
  40. B80 A. Rey et al. / Cognition 68 (1998) B71-B80