Adaptive Capacity of Households and Institutions in Dealing with Floods in Chiang Mai, Thailand (original) (raw)

Abstract

"Climate change is a modern day concern of serious proportions. Reducing vulnerability to climate change impacts may be viewed either in terms of risk reduction or improvement in adaptive capacity, or both. At the community and household levels, lessening the risk of climate change might be impossible in some instances. Therefore, reducing vulnerability can be done only by enhancing the adaptive capacity of the affected households and communities. In Thailand, flooding is a major climate change impact. This study, carried out in Thailand, set out to determine the indicators of adaptive capacity and measure the adaptation gaps between past adaptation measures and alternative adaptation possibilities. Adaptation possibilities were not restricted to new methods of adaptation, but included improvements to previous adaptation actions in terms of level and timing. Chiang Mai Province was chosen as the study area since it had a long history of flooding. Studying how the people adapted to the floods here, regardless of whether they were climate-change induced or not, would provide valuable information on adaptation capacities and strategies of both households and local institutions. At the institutional level, it was found that the flood mitigation plans of the local authorities focused narrowly on structural measures and were carried out sporadically at different jurisdictions while development planning did not take into account flood adaptation/mitigation needs. This sometimes resulted in negative externalities such as worsening floods in downstream areas. The study also found that social considerations are just as important as technical ones in the early stages of flood mitigation. The flood early warning system in Chiang Mai Province was well-developed and the flood risk map was very useful. At the household level, most past adaptation strategies were autonomous and individual in nature. Households in the rural area, which faced recurrent floods every year, were more prepared for adaptation than households in the urban area which rarely experienced floods. The latter did not believe the early warnings because they did not think that such big floods would occur in their area. Increasing public awareness and knowledge about flood preparedness was essential. The evidence in both rural and urban sites showed that the poor suffered from the floods more than the rich, for example, flood damage costs accounted for 54.2% of the household income of the poor, but only 9.7% of the rich households in the urban area. Finally, barriers to adaptation possibilities were not confined to financial constraints but also comprised non-financial constraints like knowing about the floods too late to harvest crops or perceptions that flood mitigation was the government’s responsibility. The over-reliance on public flood protection measures may also deter households from taking precautionary action on their own."

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (16)

  1. Adger, W. N. 2003. Social aspects of adaptive capacity In Climate Change, Adaptive Capacity and Development. Joel B. Smith, Richard J.T. Klein and Salleemul Huq. (ed.) Imperial College Press. London. UK.
  2. Chiang Mai City Municipality. 2005. The causes of the 2005 floods and flood mitigation measures. Internal Powerpoint presentation to staff on 15 December 2005. Chiang Mai City Municipality. Chiang Mai. Thailand.
  3. DDPM (Department of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation). 2005. Flood damage in Chiang Mai Province in 2005. Internal official records. Chiang Mai. Thailand.
  4. ______. 2006. Thailand's Country Report. Research and International Cooperation Bureau, Department of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, Ministry of Interior. Bangkok, Thailand.
  5. ______. 2008. Manual on Community Based Disaster Risk Management project, Department of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, The Ministry of Interior (in Thai). Bangkok, Thailand.
  6. Grothmann, T. and Reusswig, F. 2006. People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not, Natural hazard, 38: 101-120.
  7. Garden, P. 2007. The Chiang Mai floods of 2005. USER Working Paper WP-2007-19. Unit for Social and Environmental Research, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai.
  8. Hanneman, W.H. 2000. Adaptation and its measurement. Climate Change. 45: 571-581.
  9. Hanneman, W.H. 2008. Observations on the Economics of Adaptation: Uncertainty and Timing. OECD Workshop on the Economics of Adaptation, April 7-8, 2008. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/22/31/40897430.pdf. Downloaded Downloaded 12 May 2009.
  10. Jompakdee, W. 2003. River in jeopardy and the role of civil society in river restoration: Thai experiences. Paper presented in Water Awareness Program, ADB National Water Media Workshop. 13-16 November 2003. Chiang Mai, Thailand. http://www.adb.org/Documents/Events/2003/WAP/THA/Jompakdee\_paper.pdf. 12 May 2009) ADB. Bangkok. Thailand.
  11. Lebel L., and B.T. Tan Sinh. 2007. Politics of floods and disasters. In Lebel L., Dore J., Daniel R., Koma YS (ed.). Democratizing water governance in the Mekong region. Mekong Press. Chiang Mai. Thailand. 37-54.
  12. Lebel, L., B.T. Sinh, P. Garden, S. Seng, L.A. Tuan, and D.V. Truc. 2008. The promise of flood protection: dikes and dams, drains and diversion. USER Working Paper WP-2008-07. Unit of Social and Environmental Research, Chiang Mai University. Chiang Mai. Thailand.
  13. Manuta, J., S. Khrutmuang, D. Huaisai, and L. Label. 2006. Institutionalized incapacities and practice in flood disaster management in Thailand. Science and Culture 72:10-22.
  14. National Statistical Office. 2005. Household Socio-Economic Survey Report. Bangkok, Thailand. ONEP (Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning). 2005. The Ping River Conservation. Bangkok . Final Report. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. Bangkok, Thailand. (In Thai).
  15. ______. 2006. The State of the Environment 2005. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. Bangkok, Thailand. (In Thai).
  16. Royal Irrigation Department. 2008. Flood prevention and mitigation plan for Chiang Mai City. Regional Irrigation Office 1, Chiang Mai, Thailand. (In Thai).