Fluctuations and Response of Nonequilibrium States (original) (raw)

Abstract

A generalized fluctuation-response relation is found for thermal systems driven out of equilibrium. Its derivation is independent of many details of the dynamics, which is only required to be first order. The result gives a correction to the equilibrium fluctuation-dissipation theorem, in terms of the correlation between observable and excess in dynamical activity caused by the perturbation. Previous approaches to this problem are recovered and extended in a unifying scheme.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (31)

  1. R. Kubo, Rep. Prog. Phys. 29, 255 (1966).
  2. U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, A. Puglisi, L. Rondoni, and A. Vulpiani, Phys. Rep. 461, 111 (2008).
  3. J. P. Sethna, Entropy, Order Parameters, and Complexity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006).
  4. U. Deker and F. Haake, Phys. Rev. A 11, 2043 (1975).
  5. P. Ha ¨nggi and H. Thomas, Phys. Rep. 88, 207 (1982).
  6. M. Falcioni, S. Isola, and A. Vulpiani, Phys. Lett. A 144, 341 (1990).
  7. L. Bertini et al., J. Stat. Phys. 107, 635 (2002).
  8. L. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and G. Parisi, J. Phys. I 4, 1641 (1994).
  9. E. Lippiello, F. Corberi, and M. Zannetti, Phys. Rev. E 71, 036104 (2005).
  10. G. Diezemann, Phys. Rev. E 72, 011104 (2005).
  11. R. Chetrite, G. Falkovich, and K. Gawedzki, J. Stat. Mech. (2008) P08005.
  12. T. Speck and U. Seifert, Europhys. Lett. 74, 391 (2006).
  13. V. Blickle et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 210601 (2007).
  14. C. Maes and K. Netoc ˇny ´, Europhys. Lett. 82, 30 003 (2008);
  15. C. Maes, K. Netoc ˇny ´, and B. Wynants, Markov Proc. Rel. Fields 14, 445 (2008); Physica (Amsterdam) 387A, 2675 (2008).
  16. C. Appert-Rolland et al., Phys. Rev. E 78, 021122 (2008);
  17. T. Bodineau and R. Lefevere, J. Stat. Phys. 133, 1 (2008);
  18. M. Gorissen, J. Hooyberghs, and C. Vanderzande, Phys. Rev. E 79, 020101(R) (2009);
  19. J. P. Garrahan et al., J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 075 007 (2009).
  20. C. Maes and M. H. van Wieren, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 240601 (2006);
  21. V. Lecomte, C. Appert-Rolland, and F. van Wijland, J. Stat. Phys. 127, 51 (2007).
  22. W. De Roeck and C. Maes, Phys. Rev. E 76, 051117 (2007).
  23. C. Maes and K. Netoc ˇny ´, J. Stat. Phys. 110, 269 (2003);
  24. C. Maes, Se ´minaire. Poincare ´2, 29 (2003).
  25. We do not discuss here some extra difficulties for under- damped diffusions, but it is valid for Markov jump pro- cesses and for overdamped diffusions.
  26. ðd=dsÞhVðsÞQðtÞi ¼ ðd=dsÞ P x ðxÞ½e sL ðVe ðtÀsÞL QÞðxÞ Þ P x ðxÞfe sL ½ðLVÞe ðtÀsÞL QgðxÞ ¼ hðdV=dsÞQðtÞi:
  27. T. Speck and U. Seifert, Phys. Rev. E 79, 040102(R) (2009).
  28. T. Nakamura and S. Sasa, Phys. Rev. E 77, 021108 (2008).
  29. J. R. Gomez-Solano et al., arXiv:0903.1075.
  30. Y. Oono and M. Paniconi, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 130, 29 (1998);
  31. T. Hatano and S. Sasa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3463 (2001).