“We Just Want to Help” - Nonprofits Contributions to Community Resilience in the Disaster Space (original) (raw)
Related papers
MATEC Web of Conferences
As a country with high risk of disasters, the people of Indonesia have to prepare and anticipate these calamities. One of the most important aspects of disaster risk reduction at the local level is social capital. This paper discusses the role of social capital in strengthening community disaster preparedness for effective respond and its potential for building back after recovery, focusing on local wisdom, prior experiences and re-establishment of community livelihoods. Local wisdom plays an important role in raising community efforts to find relief and recover from the impact of the earthquake in Bantul and floods in Jambi. The spirit of community-self, mutual help and fundraising help the Javanese in Bantul to be strong and care among neighbors. The community that supported by the local leaders and institutions agreed to set up priority for affected people who need more help. Meanwhile, experiences of the people in Jambi on regular floods made them aware and assisted them to deve...
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020
Large-scaled disaster events had increasingly occurred worldwide due to global and environmental change. Evidently, disaster response cannot rely merely on the public force. In the golden hour of crisis, not only the individuals should learn to react, protect themselves, and try to help each other, but also the local school, enterprise, non-government organization (NGO), nonprofit organization (NPO), and volunteer groups should collaborate to effectively deal with disaster events. New Taipei City (NTPC), Taiwan, was aware of the need for non-public force response and therefore developed the process of enhancing local disaster management networks through promoting the resilient community since 2009. The concept of a resilient community is to build community-based capacity for mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery in an all-hazards manner. This study organized the NTPC experience and presented the standard operation procedure (SOP) to promote the resilient community, key ob...
Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 2014
ABSTRACT Because governmental structures put in place to mitigate disaster risks and aid communities in the disaster recovery process have, at times, proven to be inadequate, reliance on other types of organizations is necessary for some communities to survive. Although there are a number of different actors that played a role in the reestablishment of communities within New Orleans since Hurricane Katrina took place, the Mary Queen of Vietnam (MQVN) Catholic Church is a prime example of how a community-based organization stepped in to address the needs of its community. This article examines how MQVN garnered social capital within its surrounding community to pursue successful community development in the absence of and opposition to governmental support and political resistance. This article will first review the government failure and decrease in civic trust that fostered a robust third-sector response in disaster recovery and redevelopment. Then, using social capital theory, the article supports the notion that civic distrust and confidence is derived from government and institutional performance, rather than increasing individualism or declining social trust. Finally, implications for federal disaster policy and third-sector disaster interventions are proposed.
Social Capital: A tool for disaster recovery
This study investigates the extent to which social capital can be used as a tool for community recovery following a disaster. This project investigates two communities located in the Mentawai Islands, west Sumatra, that were devastated by the October 25th tsunami in 2010. The study looks at social capital concepts at community, NGO and state level to help understand the key points that make it a successful tool. One of the key problems outlined is communication and the difficulties with access due to the remote nature of the Islands, which consequently had a knock-on effect on state and NGO interventions. It was found that social capital is important in a community’s recovery and yet can also present gender exclusions. Through qualitative research methods and examination of the literature, it can be said that social capital when present can empower certain communities, yet there is a need to understand the different representations of NGOs, and the diversity of communities to safely say social capital is a tool that fits all circumstances.
Community Resilience Model: A Case Study of an Earthquake Disaster
Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction
The aim of the study is to construct a model of community resilience using the earthquake in Indonesia as a case study. Indonesia has problems with how the community prepares itself before, during, and after a disaster. The study employs exploratory focus group interviews with respondents grouped into communities from Central Sulawesi and West Java who were affected by the earthquake. The study reveals that there are clear gaps in the community response to the mitigation, preparation, and recovery of humanitarian disasters. There is a lack of disaster awareness, cooperation and coordination between the community and the local government, and the need for strategic steps before a disaster is one of the key findings from the interviews. This study provides a model of strategic mitigation, preparation, response, and recovery for the community so that the dynamics of the disaster management cycle can be understood, and lessons provided to improve their resilience in the case of future e...
Journal of Disaster Research, 2010
This special issue of JDR is centered on the theme of “Building Local Capacity for Long-term Disaster Resilience.” Eight papers and one commentary describe challenges in various countries of promoting disaster resilience at local, sub-national, and national levels. Resilience is broadly defined here as the capacity of a community to: 1) survive amajor disaster; 2) retain essential structure and functions; and 3) adapt to post-disaster opportunities for transforming community structure and functions to meet new challenges. This working definition is similar to others put forward in the growing literature on resilience. Resilience can also be seen as an element of sustainability. Initially referring only to environmental conditions, the concept of sustainable development was defined as that which meets the needs of present generations while not compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs (Bruntland Commission, Our Common Future, 1987). Now, the term sustaina...
Resiliency tactics during financial crisis: The nonprofit resiliency framework
Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2021
The ability of nonprofits to weather hard times is a popular theme in the literature, yet most of the research is spent on predicting organizational closure. Unfortunately, this offers little guidance to nonprofits attempting to both survive and deliver services during crises. We use the lived experiences of 31 nonprofits-a mix of umbrella groups and direct human service providers-during the Illinois state budget impasse to understand nonprofit organization resilience in times of crisis. We establish the Nonprofit Resiliency Framework using qualitative analysis, mapping tactics in five areas: financial, human resources, outreach, program and services, and management and leadership. This study not only provides further empirical investigation of organizational resilience, but also useful advice for nonprofits on how to weather a complex financial crisis. K E Y W O R D S budget crisis, human services, nonprofit management, resiliency 1 | INTRODUCTION The ability of nonprofits to weather hard times is a popular theme in the academic and practitioner literature; however, most of the research is spent on predicting whether these organiza
Oregon Nonprofit Disaster Preparedness: Finding from the 2018 Survey
2018
This report summarizes results from a survey administered in spring 2018 to 501(c)(3) charitable benefit nonprofit organizations across Oregon. The survey was developed by Portland State University in collaboration with the City Club of Portland's Earthquake Report Advocacy Committee (CCERAC) and the Nonprofit Association of Oregon (NAO), following Sutton & Tierney's (2006) and Ritchie, Tierney, & Gilbert's (2010) classification and previous survey. Based on the survey distribution process, primarily through NAO, PSU's Nonprofit Institute, and other nonprofit and public agencies' networks, these survey results are based on a convenience sample of nonprofits that responded to the survey. As such, the results are not representative of ALL nonprofits in Oregon. Nevertheless, the survey results are quite telling of how concerned and informed nonprofit respondents are about potential hazards, what actions they have taken to prepare for potential disasters, as well as their perceived roles should a major disaster like the Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) event occur. The survey results are also very informative with respect to the challenges and barriers to disaster preparedness that nonprofits currently face, and the kinds of assistance they would need to be able to adequately prepare for major disasters. The focus on charitable nonprofit organizations is driven by the fact that nonprofits have come to be regarded as a "critical civic infrastructure" that is essential for the delivery of a range of social services that are key to the livelihood of both young and elderly, the disabled, those suffering from debilitating illnesses, and those living in poverty within our communities (Ritchie et al., 2010). In a nutshell, nonprofits serve the most vulnerable in our communities and strive to fill gaps in our social service system. Not only do nonprofits often complement government in the provision of social services, they often are contracted by agencies to provide public social services.
Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 2015
The scope and scale of a community's service assistance demands during a disaster will exceed, typically, the capacity of any single set of governmental, private, or nonprofit sector organizations. As a result inter-sector coordination and collaboration represents a key element in effective disaster management. Nonprofit organizations play a critical role in providing a wide range of early response assistance and mass care services when disasters occur. Here, we investigate the particular ways in which nonprofit organizations engaged in inter-sector coordination and collaboration during a major disaster, Superstorm Sandy. We do so in order to build on the somewhat limited prior empirical literature accounting for the specific nature of nonprofits' disaster service provision efforts. Our analysis offers several contributions to existing literature: it demonstrates the scope of disaster-related services provided, it outlines the key qualities of inter-sector coordination and collaboration actions, and it identifies the way in which the nonprofit sector's early phase relief actions might be connected later to longer term disaster recovery efforts.