Success determinants of full-time researchers at hospitals. A perceptions-based study (original) (raw)
Related papers
New institutions are coming to the fore as stakeholders in research, particularly hospitals and clinical departments involved in providing health care. As a result, new environments for research are gaining importance. This study aims to investigate how different individual characteristics, together with collective and contextual factors, affect the activity and performance of researchers in the particular setting of hospitals and research centres affiliated with the Spanish National Health System (NHS). We used a combination of quantitative science indicators and perception-based data obtained through a survey of researchers working at NHS hospitals and research centres. Inbreeding and involvement in clinical research is the combination of factors with the greatest influence on scientific productivity, because these factors are associated with increased scientific output both overall as well as in high-impact journals. Ultimately, however, satisfaction with human resources in research group combined with gender (linked in turn to leadership) is the combination of factors associated most clearly with the most relevant indicator of productivity success, i.e. the number of articles in high-impact journals as principal author. Researchers’ competitiveness in obtaining research funding as principal investigator is associated with a combination of satisfaction with research autonomy and involvement in clinical research. Researchers’ success is not significantly related with their age, seniority and international experience. The way health care institutions manage and combine the factors likely to influence research may be critical for the development and maintenance of research-conducive environments, and ultimately for the success of research carried out in hospitals and other settings within the national public health system.
The Professional Medical Journal
Research training at higher education level for clinical and teaching staff isimportant and there are methods to introduce research culture in employees at clinical andteaching departmental level. Objectives: To recognize and quantify the research productivitystatus of teaching and clinical faculty of (DUHS) Dow University of Health Sciences Karachibefore and after its establishment in 2003. Design: Non experimental cross sectional study.Period: 1st October 2012 to 1st February 2013. Setting: Medical college Karachi. Subjects andmethod: Students of third semester were applied to sort out the ten years record from 1998 to2008 of all researches conducted by faculty of Dow University of Health Sciences, published ininternational and national journals by using different online search engines. Research Outputwas measured in terms of the increase in the number of publications and quality of publicationsbefore and after the launch of Dow University. Data was entered in Microsoft office exc...
A method for measuring individual research productivity in hospitals: development and feasibility
BMC health services research, 2015
Research capacity is a prerequisite for any health care institution intending to provide high-quality care, yet, few clinicians engage in research, and their work is rarely recognized. To make research an institutional activity, it could be helpful to measure health care professionals' research performance. However, a comprehensive approach to do this is lacking. We conducted a literature analysis to determine how best to assess research performance. Our method was not restricted to bibliometric and citation parameters, as is usually the case, but also including "hidden" activities, generally not considered in research performance evaluations. A set of 12 easily retrievable indicators was used and corresponding points assigned according to a weighting system intended to reflect the effort estimated to perform each activity. We observed a highly skewed score distribution, with a minority of health care professionals performing well across the indicators. The highest sco...
Predictors of Research Productivity among Administrators, Faculty, and Students
Liceo Journal of Higher Education Research
Determining the influence of research culture, competency, accountability on research productivity among the administrators, faculty and students in a private non-sectarian university was the primary aim of the study. A purposive sampling was employed to obtain the 174 participants of the study. A valid and reliable survey questionnaire was used to gather the data. A developing research culture is evident. Likewise, the research competency is moderately developed. Accountability is rarely practiced in the conduct of research specifically in publishing results; and, applying and utilization of funds are never practiced. A poor research productivity is evident; hence, there is a need to improve in all areas such as the number of trainings relative to research attended, research proposed, approved, implemented, and the number of publications done by the administrators, faculty, and students. Research culture, competency, and accountability have a positive and highly significant relationship with research productivity. Meanwhile, publishing results, research skills, research capability, and research infrastructure are the best predictors of research productivity.
RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; EVALUATION AMONG FACULTY MEMBERS AT DOW UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES KARACHI
ABSTRACT… Research training at higher education level for clinical and teaching staff is important and there are methods to introduce research culture in employees at clinical and teaching departmental level. Objectives: To recognize and quantify the research productivity status of teaching and clinical faculty of (DUHS) Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi before and after its establishment in 2003. Design: Non experimental cross sectional study. Period: 1 st October 2012 to 1st February 2013. Setting: Medical college Karachi. Subjects and method: Students of third semester were applied to sort out the ten years record from 1998 to 2008 of all researches conducted by faculty of Dow University of Health Sciences, published in international and national journals by using different online search engines. Research Output was measured in terms of the increase in the number of publications and quality of publications before and after the launch of Dow University. Data was entered in Microsoft office excel version 2007 and analyzed it in statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 17; Pearson chisquare was applied to test the statistical significance at 95% confidence interval. Results: Data of total 594 researches was found out between the years1998 to 2008, 175(29.5%) researches were published before the foundation of Dow university of Health sciences Karachi (2003) while 419(70.5) researches were produced after 173(45.6%) research papers were published in indexed journals before, "whereas" 206(54.4%) were published in indexed journal after 2003. Original research articles were 152 (31%) before 2003, which rose to 339 (69%). Publications of article types such as case reports, case series, and short communication, editorials and review articles also increased to 80 from 23 after establishment of Dow University. Conclusions: From a total of 594 faculty researches o published in indexed and non indexed journals between the years 1998 and 2008; there was a significant increase in production after establishment of Dow university of Health Sciences Hence it is confidently reported that due to establishment of research committees after the founding, there is a promotion and facilitation of research activities among faculty members.
Journal of Dental Education, 2008
This report describes the research productivity of the members of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR) Behavioral Sciences and Health Services Research Group and examines personal and professional factors related to greater productivity. The findings from previous studies suggested there might be gender discrimination in opportunities for women faculty. Members on the active membership list for this IADR group were surveyed by email. Most were dentists, and threequarters had external funding for their research. The primary outcome measure was the number of self-reported published articles in PubMed in the preceding twenty-four months. The mean number of these publications was 4.9 (SD=5.1). Gender and time in research were the best predictors of research productivity of this population. There was no difference in time for research between the men and women in this study. Controlling for gender, the best single predictor of research productivity remained percent time spent in research. Overall, the members of the IADR group spent almost three times as much time in research and were more than twice as productive as faculty members as a whole as described in earlier studies. In view of the current emphasis in many countries on addressing the social and behavioral determinants of oral health disparities, the productivity of this area of dental research is very important. Trends toward clinically oriented, non-researchintensive dental schools in the United States and reductions in time and funding available to conduct research should be of concern.
2011
OBJECTIVE To identify the prevalence, factors and obstacles affecting research productivity among academic staff at medical and health colleges in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. METHODS This cross-sectional survey employed self-administered questionnaires to collect data on faculty members' profile, research activities, and obstacles impeding research productivity. The questionnaires were distributed randomly to 500 faculty members, of which 389 (77.8%) completed the questionnaire at 10 medical and health colleges during January to April 2011. The data were analyzed and presented in a descriptive fashion. RESULTS Only 150 (38.6%) respondents reported published work in the past 2 years. Of these, 80% indicated sole-authors research and around a quarter (26%) reported co-authors work. Males and young faculty members were more likely to publish research than their counterparts. Faculty members who reported involvement in administrative activities were less likely to publish. Those wh...
Scientometrics, 2021
The h-index is often used to evaluate researchers and to measure their respective contributions to the scientific community. However, it does not take into account the relative contribution of each author to the articles. We aimed to assess the added value of the h(fa)-index, an index introducing a weighting factor for the first author. This cross-sectional study was conducted in March 2020 in Switzerland. We selected all hospital-based senior physicians practicing internal medicine or family medicine in the six university hospitals. Using Web of Science, we retrieved the h-index and computed the h(fa)-index of all physicians with a non-zero h-index. We used Spearman coefficients to examine the correlation between the two indices and Cohen’s kappa to determine the inter-rater agreement. 244 physicians were included in the study (men: 63%). They had a median h-index of 3 (IQR 11) and a median h(fa) index of 4.5 (IQR 14). The correlation between the two indices was very high (rho 0.98...