Castillo, G. (2023) Autonomy of Migration: From the Political Production of Borders to Migrant Struggles [versión en ingles del artículo Castillo, G. (2023) Autonomía de las migraciones: de la producción política de fronteras a las luchas migrantes, Migraciones Internacionales, Vol. 14, Art. 7]. (original) (raw)
Related papers
International migration: The state-sovereignty-migration nexus
The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 2015
Commonly, international human migration is blamed for corroding states sovereignty, especially stemming from policy circles, academic literature and citizens of the host countries. This has attracted the attention of the media highlighting hazards of being a migrant, with some countries viewing migrants as enemies; and, Cuba provides a vivid case. Yet in other countries, migrants are viewed as important contributors to social and economic development, with Mexico, the Dominican Republic and India serving as examples. This article locates migrants in the framework of human rights as guided by international law without prejudice to the demands of state sovereignty, but linking the two in the context of developing international standards. Migration is seen as a feature of human history dating back to primordial time. Nothing appears surprising in the movement of people across borders, defining a migrant through emigration and immigration while giving due respect to the sovereignty of s...
The Political Sociology of International Migration: Borders, boundaries, rights, and politics
2010
Politics is an underdeveloped topic in migration studies, a lacuna that derives from prevailing intellectual biases, whether having to do with those that focus on individual action or those that emphasize social processes. This paper identifies the central issues entailed in the study of migrant politics, whether having to do with receiving society immigrant politics or sending society emigrant politics, reviewing and assessing the ways in which scholars have tackled this problem.
Recuperating the Sideshows of Capitalism: The Autonomy of Migration Today
This text is a reflection on our 2007 contribution to the TRANSIT MIGRATION research project, ÒThe Autonomy of Migration: Ten Theses Towards a Methodology.Ó 1 Within the project, we analyzed the movements of migration and the migration policies deployed against them at the edges of the EU, in order to decipher the contours of a new regime of emerging migration politics. We were interested in investigating, from the perspective of social theory, what was symptomatic in movements of migration. We were interested in tracing the crossing of borders, the traversing of territories, the enmeshing of cultures, the unsettling of institutions (first among them nation-states, but also citizenship), the connecting of languages, and the flight from exploitation and oppression Ð interested, in other words, in investigating what migration teaches us about the conditions of contemporary forms of sociality, and that which goes beyond them. With this article, we pick up the thread and offer some furt...
Autonomy of Migration and the Governmentality of Plastic Borders
Dve domovini: Two homelands, 2019
Inspired by the autonomy of migration approach, we analyse borders as sites of control and violence but also as migrant praxis, as strategies of escape and rupture. We explore the idea of “bodily borders”, emphasizing that borders shape subjects on the move and are themselves shaped by the embodied experiences of border-crossers. Drawing on Foucault’s concept of governmentality and Malabou’s analysis of the concept of plasticity, we argue that migrations are governed through “plastic borders” that are formed as direct responses to migrant mobilities, using the empirical example of the externalization of borders as an EU policy of migration management.
In the last decades a very diverse range of initiatives have been undertaken in order to intensify and diversify the ways human mobility is managed and restricted. This trend towards a 'diversification' of the migration control strategies stems from the increased awareness by the nation-states of the profoundly controversial nature of the migration management enterprise because of its political, economic, social and moral implications. The states' ambition to rigorously regulate the movement of people across borders needs, therefore, to be made more "subtle" in order to appease and satisfy, or at least give the impression of satisfying, the number of objectives pursued by the different stakeholders. Satisfying these coincident objectives requires one to go beyond the idea of mere control and instead consider a broader strategic scheme where even opposing notions and ideas can coexist and be employed in pursuit of the same ultimate goal.
The Autonomy of Migration within the Crises (by N. De Genova, G.Garelli, M. Tazzioli)
There has been an unrelenting proliferation of official discourses of "crisis" and "emergency" over the last several years. The historical era for our concerns may be understood to properly commence with the enunciation of an effectively global state of emergency with the promulgation of the War on Terror in the aftermath of the events of September 11, 2001 in the United States, which marked a watershed in the reconfiguration of the global geopolitical landscape of the post-Cold War world order. Those events have served as the authorizing pretext not only for paroxysms of "antiterrorist" securitization, surveillance, and political repression but also for unnumbered major and minor military invasions, wars, occupations, civil wars, proxy wars, remotecontrol (drone) wars, (pseudo-)revolutions, palace coups, covert operations, psy-ops, and counterinsurgency campaigns on a global scale. In the midst of that protracted and massively destructive series of politico-military disruptions of the world geopolitical order, the systemic convulsions that have wracked the world capitalist economy, especially since 2008, subsequently became perhaps the premier and dominant referent for "the crisis" everywhere. Then, in 2015, alarmist reactions to an ostensible "migrant" or "refugee crisis" in Europe lent an unprecedented prominence to the veritable and undeniable autonomy of (transnational, cross-border) migrant and refugee movements, replete with their heterogeneity of insistent, disobedient, and incorrigible practices of appropriating mobility and making claims to space (Bojadžijev and Mezzadra 2015; De Genova Acknowledgments: We are grateful to Stephan Scheel for his careful, thorough, and thoughtful critical feedback on an 1 earlier draft of this essay.
Proliferating Borders in the Battlefield of Migration. Rethinking Freedom of Movement
Borders and migration have been for a long time at the center of my research and political agenda. And although the original focus of my work in the early 1990s has been Italy, with its peculiar migratory history, I have been relatively quick to expand the scope of my research, in particular through my participation in research and activist networks first in Europe and then in other parts of the world, including North Africa, the U.S., Australia, and India. How to make