THE RELIABILITY OF THE 19 th CENTURY FRENCH AND MODERN ARMENOLOGICAL INTERPRETATIONS OF THE BIBLE INFORMATION ABOUT MT. ARARAT IN THE LIGHT OF THE QUMRAN MANUSCRIPTS (original) (raw)
Related papers
Finding the Mountains of Ararat: a Geographical and Textual Comparison of Mt. Ararat and Mt. Judi
According to the Bible in the book of Genesis, Noah's Ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat. "And the Ark rested on the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat." The mountains of Ararat are to be found in the region known as ancient Armenia, roughly corresponding to Eastern Anatolia. Syrian and Armenian tradition of the early centuries AD had a tradition of the ark landing at Mount Judi, where according to Josephus the remains of the ark were still shown in the 1st century AD. Hence the obvious question; where is Mt. Judi located? To explore the location of Mt. Judi, we will examine the geographical and textual comparisons of Mt. Ararat and Mt. Judi with ancient historical sources- the Bible, The Jewish Torah, the Assyrians, the Qur’an and Josephus’s historical writings.
Biblical Mt. Ararat: Two Identifications. Comparative Mythology, 2016, Vol. 2/1, 68-80.
The biblical Ararat, mountain of landing of Noah’s Ark has two general identifications in the Armenian Highland: Mountain of Corduena (modern Cudi dağı) and Masis (Ararat, Ağrı dağı), situated respectively in the extreme south-east and extreme northeast of modern Turkey). The ancient sources actualized the first localization. Since the 12th century the second became more and more popular. The paper deals with the myths and legends associated with those mountains and the history of identification of the biblical Ararat.
5th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM on MOUNT ARARAT and NOAH'S ARK ABSTRACT BOOK
5th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM on MOUNT ARARAT and NOAH'S ARK ABSTRACT BOOK, 2019
5th International Symposium on Mount Ararat and Noah’s Ark was hosted by Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University on 16-18 October 2019 with the contributions from Governorate of Ağrı, Ağrı Municipality and Belli Education, Culture, History and Archeology Research Center (BEKAM). The opening ceremony of the symposium was held in Ottoman Hall at Culture and Congress Center at Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, while the scientific sessions were held in Seljuk Hall, Anatolia Hall and Hall A. A number of scientists, authors and researchers from Turkey, Nakhichevan, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Poland, Hungary, Germany, Denmark and the United States participated in the symposium. With a 5137-meter height, Ararat is a magnificent and the highest mountain of Anatolia. However, the majesty and fame are not only for the height of it, but also for all the holiness it holds that makes Mount Ararat the subject of the legends and religious scriptures. Makes Mount Ararat magnificent and famous is not only its height, but also its sanctity which is remarked in holy books and in legends. In addition to polytheistic religions of Ancient Era, Mount Ararat has been the subject of the sacred books of monotheistic religions like Old Testament and the Bible with the Great Flood event and it has become legendary until today. Mount Ararat, which is remarked in the Great Flood, is the common heritage of Abrahamic religions and it continues to carry the oldest cultural heritage in the history of humanity to the today’s world. Mount Ararat has been the subject of history, archeology, art history, geography, literature, geology, physics, chemistry, economics, tourism, theology, religious narration, ethnography, music, painting, legend, traditional culinary culture and food which have been written by millions of people for centuries. Mount Ararat combines different cultures from Eastern and Northeastern Anatolia, the Caucasus, Crimea, Russia, Azerbaijan, Iran, Central Asia, Europe and from the Middle East countries and it has a universal identity. We are grateful to executives of Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, Ağrı Governorship, Ağrı Municipality, Belli Education, Culture, History and Archeology Research Center (BEKAM) that brought dozens of scientists, writers and researchers together. In addition, we would like to thank İbrahim Çeçen Foundation (IC) that sponsored generously the symposium and its Director Dr. Meral Dinçer. Also, we would like to thank Serhat Development Agency (SERKA) and its Secretary General Mr. Oktay Güven for undertaking the publication of the Symposium Proceedings Book. We warmly thank the members of the organizing committee and members in the secretariat Lecturer Vedat Evren Belli, Lecturer Nimetullah Aldemir, Lecturer Mehmet Mehdi Karakoç, Research Assist. Muhammed Tunagür, Research Assist. Oğuz Han Yel and Mehmet Fatih Karaoğlan as the Head of Health, Culture and Sports Department who have great endeavors from the preparation process of the symposium to end.
Mount Ararat Archaeological Survey
Bible and Spade, 2008
One of the most important and mysterious subjects that has remained from antiquity to this day has been the Flood of Noah, along with the views of where the Ark and those in it came to rest. We find various views about the Flood of Noah not only in the holy books representing the three great religions but also in almost all the important cultures of antiquity, in ancient sources and modern research about the Flood. One of the primary areas of this study is around Mount Ararat and the Ararat Plain. This paper documents the basics of the archaeological and historical research in the Ararat Plain and discusses the potential influence of the ancient Kura-Araxes Early Transcaucasion Culture (ETC) and the associated ceramics, typically jars and bowls that are mostly handmade with the dominant colors of black, red, brown and grey.
Biblica, 2020
In this article we deal with the historical realities behind what we consider to belong to the old part of the Ark Narrative (1 Sam 4,1 – 7,1). Based on the finds of excavations at Kiriath-jearim, Shiloh and other places mentioned in the story as well as text exegesis and understanding of the geopolitical situation, we suggest that the story reflects the ideology and aspirations of Israel in the first half of the 8th century BCE, the time of Jeroboam II. We propose that the main theme of the narrative is the transfer of the Ark of Yhwh from Shiloh to Kiriath-jearim on the border of Israel and Judah. This narrative is apparently connected to a United Israel ideology in the days of Jeroboam II, according to which the territory and people of the two Hebrew kingdoms should be ruled by a Northern king from Samaria; this was the de-facto situation following the victory of Joash over Amaziah at Beth-shemesh (2 Kings 14,11-13). Choosing Kiriath-jearim as the location for the temple of the Ark was related to this concept.
“1Q19 (The Book of Noah) Reconsidered”, Henoch 31,2 (2009), pp. 284- 306
The ancient Jewish scrolls discovered at Qumran yielded a variety of previously unknown literary works. Among these are texts produced by the Qumran community, as well as writings originating in other circles of the Second Temple Judaism. While the literature of the yah ad, distinguished by its peculiar terminology and ideology, is written in Hebrew, the works brought to Qumran from without are composed both in Hebrew and Aramaic. The relationships between the Aramaic and Hebrew texts, both sectarian and non-sectarian, have not been yet sufficiently studied. As a contribution to such an enquiry the present paper explores the relations between the Hebrew scroll 1Q19 and two Aramaic works, 1 Enoch and Genesis Apocryphon (1Q20).