Public Goods or Political Pandering: Evidence from IMF Programs in Latin America and Eastern Europe (original) (raw)
Related papers
IMF lending programs in the wake of the global crisis: political influences and crisis prevention
2011
Abstract In the wake of the global crisis the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has increased its exposure to low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) and stepped up the overhaul of its lending approach to enhance its role in preventing crises. Analysis of the IMF loan arrangements in LMICs since 2008 shows that political similarity between borrowers and G7 governments has influenced the likelihood to participate in IMF programs, especially where the crisis was severe.
Between Economic Necessity and Ideology: IMF Programs Before and During the Global Financial Crisis
This paper analyzes the role of government ideology in IMF program initiation in Latin America and Eastern Europe during the 1981-2012 period. Particularly in Eastern Europe, the statistical tests reveal a significant increase in the magnitude and resilience of partisan differences in the recent round of IMF programs compared to the pre-crisis years. Based on comparisons to earlier crises, this recent revival of ideology seems to be primarily due to the external roots and the large magnitude of the current crisis, which mirrors the dynamics of the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s. By comparison, regional partisan trends, such as the rise of the Latin American Left in the last decade, played a secondary role.
The High Politics of IMF Lending
World Politics, 1999
Analysts have long suspected that politics affects the lending patterns of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), but none have adequately specified or systematically tested competing explanations. This paper develops a political explanation of IMF lending and tests it statistically on the developing countries between 1985 and 1994. It finds that political realignment toward the United States, the largest power in the IMF, increases a country's probability of receiving an IMF loan. A country's static political alignment position has no significant impact during this period, suggesting that these processes are best modeled dynamically. An analysis of two subsamples rejects the hypothesis that the IMF has become less politicized since the end of the cold war and suggests that the influence of politics has actually increased since 1990. The behavior of multilateral organizations is still driven by the political interests of their more powerful member states.
2008
This paper can be downloaded without charge from http://www.ecb.europa.eu or from the Social Science Research Network electronic library at http://ssrn.com/abstract\_id=1292331\. 1 The authors would like to thank AFSE, CEPII, CEPN, CERDI, the CNRS 22nd Symposium on Money, Banking and Finance, ECB, EEA, ETH-KOF, EUREQua/TEAM, RIEF, SMYE and SUITE conferences and seminars participants. We are grateful to Nicolas Berman, Javier Diaz Cassou, Betrand Couillault, Rodolphe Desbordes, Arnaud Mehl, Matthieu Bussière and in particular to Farid Toubal for constructive comments. We would like to thank Axel Dreher for his comments and for providing us with his datasets. We would also like to thank the Sputnik for providing us the ideal environment for our thinking. Finally, we are grateful to an anonymous referee. All remaining errors are obviously ours. Abstract 4 Non-technical summary 5 6 Conclusions 44
IMF lending in Low-and Middle-Income Countries in the Wake of the Global Crisis
2010
Abstract: In the wake of the global crisis the International Monetary Fund (IMF) increased its exposure to low-and middle-income countries and boosted the overhaul of its lending approach to enhance its role in preventing crises. This paper tests whether IMF lending has targeted countries most affected by the crisis in order to dampen contagion effects and assesses to what extent the Fund's strategy has been driven by political-economy interests of its major shareholders.
The IMF and Neoliberal Reform in Latin America
Review of International Organizations
This study assesses the effects of IMF loans on economic liberalization in Latin America. Specifically, we are interested in whether the Fund receives greater cooperation from Latin American borrowers in the initiation of some economic reforms over others. Using a two-stage treatment effects model as well as panelcorrected standard error (PCSE) regression for 15 Latin American countries from 1980 to 2003, we find that IMF participation tends to lead to greater trade and capital reforms and less reform in privatization. These relationships are tempered by the country's relationship with the United States along with domestic group pressures.
Political Determinants of IMF Balance of Payments Lending
Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina …, 2000
How do political interests shape International Monetary Fund balance of payments lending decisions? We suggest that the institutional structure governing IMF decisionmaking creates an opportunity for American policymakers to influence IMF lending decisions. We then suggest two reasons, one based on interest group politics and one based on foreign policy objectives, why American policymakers have an incentive to exploit this opportunity. These expectations are then evaluated statistically against the entire population of IMF loans between 1985 and 1998 for which data were available. The results indicate that IMF lending decisions are responsive to American pressure. Larger IMF loans went to countries in which American banks were highly exposed and to governments closely allied with the United States.
The Global Crisis in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: How the IMF Responded
Mo. Fi. R. Working Papers, 2010
Developing countries are the least to blame for the outbreak of the financial crisis, but they are destined to suffer the most dramatic and long-lasting consequences. This chapter focuses on the early responses of the International Monetary Fund to the present crisis in low-and middle-income countries. The IMF lending policy has been harshly criticized for being sensitive not only to the fundamental imbalances in the economic conditions of borrowing countries, but also to their lobbying capacity and to political-economy interests of the IMF's major shareholders, i.e., the USA and G-7 countries, which dominate the decision-making process and the Fund's view of good economic policies. Preliminary analysis of the 2008 and 2009 IMF arrangements shows that, notwithstanding the recent changes in the lending framework and the severity of the global crisis, the Fund's credit allocation is still mainly driven by the strategic interests of Western countries, instead of the macroeconomic conditions of recipients.
How soon is now? The effects of the IMF on economic reforms in Latin America
The Review of International Organizations, 2011
This study assesses the effects of IMF loans on economic liberalization in Latin America. Specifically, we are interested in whether the Fund receives greater cooperation from Latin American borrowers in the initiation of some economic reforms over others. Using a two-stage treatment effects model as well as panelcorrected standard error (PCSE) regression for 15 Latin American countries from 1980 to 2003, we find that IMF participation tends to lead to greater trade and capital reforms and less reform in privatization. These relationships are tempered by the country's relationship with the United States along with domestic group pressures.