Sensemaking in Crises: what role for the EU? (original) (raw)
2014, Crisis Rooms: towards a global network?
AI-generated Abstract
The paper examines the evolving role of the European Union (EU) in crisis management, highlighting changes in the nature of crises and the EU's response mechanisms. It discusses the broadening scope of the EU's crisis management policies, including both military and civilian operations, and the integration of various actors and approaches to address complex emergencies. With a focus on the historical context of security definitions and collaborative strategies, the paper emphasizes the need for a coordinated response to crises that transcend national boundaries.
Related papers
Is the EU's post-Lisbon crisis management model adequate to tackle current international security challenges at both the strategic and the operational levels? The Lisbon Treaty has introduced a number of innovations in the field of the EU's crisis management which have the potential to reinvigorate the Union's security actorness, both as a norm setter (model by being) and an operational crisis manager (model by doing). This paper will investigate the prospects for the EU to become a credible security actor in the 21st century in connection with its capacity to: (1) adapt the conceptual framework of its crisis management system to the current security scenario; and (2) implement effective action on the ground. In particular, this analysis will take into consideration three main developments in the global security environment: (1) the rise of new security-political challenges; (2) the evolution of the concept of security; and (3) the proliferation of non-state actors in the field of security.
O MODELO DE GESTÃO DE CRISES DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA THE EUROPEAN UNION CRISIS MANAGEMENT MODEL
Europe has a variety of instruments at its disposal to manage current or emerging crisis. This ability to intervene is one of the main characteristics and advantages of the European Union's current crisis management model. Deploying the civil and military instruments simultaneously, however, presents major challenges in terms of coordination, and this has been one of the main shortcomings of the model. This research analyses the current EU Crisis Management model, focusing on its architecture and decision-making processes, planning and conduct of missions, and crisis management operations. To achieve our research objectives, we opted for a rigorous qualitative methodology based on bibliographical and documentary analysis combined with interviews with several experts in the field. The analysis shows that changes to the European model are needed, specifically at the level of planning and conduct structures and funding principles, but also in the establishment of doctrine and training for the different instruments, regardless of their nature. These measures will strengthen civil-military coordination, which is seen as fundamental to making the European Union's response to the various threats more effective.
Journal of Regional Security
Contemporary military operations take place in complex environments that are populated by multiple civilian and humanitarian actors facing an array of challenging issues that are not precisely 'military' in nature. This has increased the importance of addressing and managing the civil-military interface, particularly that between military and humanitarian organisations. In recognising that their relationship is not harmonious, organisations such as the EU have developed a so-called 'Comprehensive Approach' (CA) to better align the military and civilian responses to fragile states. Surprisingly, the EU's CA has been understudied while its counterparts at NATO and the UN have received much of the attention. This article fills that gap, and shows that although the CA is clearly visible in official EU documents, the EU's practical challenges with implementing and 'living' it remain immense.
The EU’s Comprehensive Approach to Crisis Management
2013
a centre for security, development and the rule of law DCAF promotes good governance and reform of the security sector. The Centre conducts research on good practices, encourages the development of appropriate norms at national and international levels, makes policy recommendations and provides in country advice and assistance programmes. DCAF’s partners include governments, parliamentarians, civil society, international organisations and the range of security sector actors such as police, judiciary, intelligence agencies, border security services and the military.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.