Working with complex problem behaviors in juvenile institutional care: staff's competence, organizational conditions and public value (original) (raw)
Related papers
Two Dimensions of the Construct of Institutionalization
1983
While an intr ased awareness of the dehumanizing and organizitionally:self-defeati g qualities of residential institutions has fostered a movement tows d community-based care, little research has4been,done to measure thy ninstitutionality" of the alternate settings. As a part of a larger study aimed at describing alternative settings.for juveniles, twp dimensions of institutionalization, i.e., perceived organizational4ontrol and/institutional program design, were examined in 30 sett' gs in six different states. perceptions of Ar organizational control were collected.from 134 members (72 percent 'line staff, 28 percent supervisory personnel) across all sites, using a matrix' charting the.l'evel of influence in treatment decision making for all stafe members.; Four clusters of sites. differing on perceived control:. were identifked ranging from an administrative hierarchy (N=6),'to a-middle-leveljontrol model (N=3), to a reszdent/supervisor/moder(Np9). Sites were also,clustered according, to 19/ items representing variables related to program rules: A \ * Rep ductions supplied. by, EDRS are-:the best that can be'made * fro the 'original document.
Psychosocial interventions in institutional settings
Harris, N., Williams, S. & Bradshaw, T. [Eds] Psychosocial Interventions for People with Schizophrenia: A Practical Guide for Mental Health Workers. Palgrave-Macmillan, Basingstoke. pp. 211-235. ISBN 978-0333777398, 2002
Stanley,N., Manthorpe,J., Penhale,B. (1999) Institutional abuse: perspectives across the life course. London, Routledge.
European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research
Institutional work includes all kinds of psychosocial assistance that offers, to people that need them, living environments and immediate environments adapted to their age, problems, disorders, and state. The diversity and dilemmas of institutional work represent the central theoretical discourse that the authors are researching in the explanations of the total institution, the exact answers regarding the help the youth that involuntarily find themselves in such institutions receive. The continued development of the discourse logically proceeds into deinstitutionalisation. Semi-structured interviews of adults that have spent their youth in such institutions represent the empirical part of the research. Extreme psychosocial pressures make the youth deviate away from goal orientation and the purpose of the institutions’ operations. So, additionally, the authors have gathered a collection of good and bad experiences to bring attention to the many imperfections that should not be self-e...
Right Care, Right Person: Let's not repeat the de-institutionalisation mistake again
Policing Insight, 2023
There has been a lot of sympathy for the concerns voiced by policing the UK that officers are often not the right people to respond to those in mental health crisis, and plenty of support for the Right Care, Right Person approach; but Dr Meron Wondemaghen, a Senior Lecturer in Criminology at the University of Hull, fears that trying to push through such significant change by a 31 August deadline will leave the health sector unable to cope, and those
Institutional Abuse: A Long History
Journal of Australian Studies, 2018
This paper explores the long history of institutions for children in Australia and of the existence of abuse within them. By examining the function which such institutions were designed to perform and the forms and structures which were devised to best achieve such purposes it argues that abuse was all too often not simply inherent in, but essential to institutional operation. It pays particular attention to the classification of children deemed to be in need of institutional "care" and show how through a process of "othering" their institutionalization too often rendered them vulnerable to abuse.
American Journal of Community Psychology, 1987
The relationship between organizational control and normalization in treatment program design was examined in 30 community-based settings for juvenile offenders. Although these two dimensions were hypothesized to be converging indicators of the institutionality of a setting, the findings indicated that they are only marginally related. More hierarchical models of decision making were not associated with more depersonalized, isolating programming, and involvement of residents and line staff in decision making did not covary with autonomy and personalization in programming. The results are discussed as evidence that institutionality is a multidimensional construct, and that future investigations must distinguish between organizational decision making and characteristics of treatment program design when assessing the institutional quality of residential service settings.