Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures following total and unicondylar knee replacement (original) (raw)
Effect of patient characteristics on reported outcomes after total knee replacement
Antonio Escobar
Rheumatology, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
A 5 year prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes after total knee replacement
S. Toksvig-Larsen
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
Limitations of the Knee Society Score in Evaluating Outcomes Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Ian Pawasarat
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Predictors of outcomes of total knee replacement surgery
Richard Field
Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Prevalence of Clinically Significant Improvement Following Total Knee Replacement
Khalid Alzahrani
The Journal of Rheumatology, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Quality of outcome data in knee arthroplasty
Andrea Berghold
Acta Orthopaedica, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery
P. Coyte
Medical care, 1995
View PDFchevron_right
A One-Question Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Is Comparable to Multiple-Question Measures in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients
Adriana Lucas
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used patient-reported outcome measures in total knee arthroplasty: review of terminologies, methods and proposed values
Prashant Meshram
Knee Surgery & Related Research
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of Patient-Reported and Clinician-Assessed Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
Terence Gioe
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Quality of life after knee revision arthroplasty
James Murray
Acta Orthopaedica, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Revision rates after knee replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers
Nikolaus Böhler
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Thresholds for Oxford Knee Score after total knee replacement surgery: a novel approach to post-operative evaluation
Jonas Bruun Kjærsgaard
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
View PDFchevron_right
Functional outcome of knee arthroplasty is dependent upon the evaluation method employed
Wouter van Hemert
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
Total knee replacement; minimal clinically important differences and responders
Lucia Perez
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
The patient results and satisfaction of knee arthroplasty in a validated grading system
Catherine Van Der Straeten
International Orthopaedics, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Minimal important change values for the Oxford Knee Score and the Forgotten Joint Score at 1 year after total knee replacement
Berend Terluin
Acta orthopaedica, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
Assessing and improving outcomes: total knee replacement
Deborah Freund
Health Services Research
View PDFchevron_right
Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Bernd Stoeckl
Acta Orthopaedica, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Patient-reported outcomes after total hip and knee replacement : comparison of mid-term results
Giles Pattison
Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
An examination of the effect of different methods of scoring pain after a total knee replacement on the number of patients who report unchanged or worse pain
O. Robertsson, Annette W-dahl
The bone & joint journal, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Correlations between patient-perceived outcome and objectively-measured biomechanical change following Total Knee Replacement
Cathy HOLT
Gait & Posture
View PDFchevron_right
Patient acceptable symptom states after totalhip or knee replacement at mid-term follow-up: Thresholds of the Oxford hip and knee scores
christiaan keurentjes
View PDFchevron_right
The Oxford Knee Score is a reliable predictor of patients in a health state worse than death and awaiting total knee arthroplasty
Irrum Afzal
Arthroplasty
View PDFchevron_right
The Cardiff Arthroplasty Satisfaction Index (CASI). A Simple Tool for the Assessment of Outcome Following Knee Arthroplasty
Peter Kempshall
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Outcome and Reproducibility of Data Concerning the Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
Martin Krismer
Journal of Bone Joint Surgery British Volume, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Agreement among clinical assessment scales for knee replacement surgery
Anders Barck
The Knee, 1997
View PDFchevron_right
How do Patient-reported Outcome Scores in International Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registries Compare?
Ronald Navarro
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
View PDFchevron_right
Limitations of the Knee Society Score in Evaluating Outcomes Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Ian Pawasarat
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American), 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Does design change in total knee arthroplasty implants affect patient-reported outcomes?
Nader Toossi
BMC Surgery
View PDFchevron_right
Patients’ perspectives of outcomes after total knee and total hip arthroplasty: a nominal group study
Serene Mirza
BMC Rheumatology, 2020
View PDFchevron_right
Cost-Benefit Comparison of the Oxford Knee Score and the American Knee Society Score in Measuring Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty
Pradeep Moonot, Y. Kalairajah
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
Traditional assessment of health outcome following total knee arthroplasty was confounded by response shift phenomenon
Joel Finkelstein
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
View PDFchevron_right