A Reflection on Using Face-To-Face Peer Review as a Method of Providing Formative Feedback (original) (raw)
Related papers
360 Degree Peer Assessment to Train Engineering Students in Giving Good Quality Feedback
2017
Engineering degrees need to incorporate activities to develop the students' skills and confidence in constructing quality feedback, and ability to critically analyse someone else's work. These skills are highly linked with what industry expects from graduates, and implicit requirements to gain accreditation from UK professional bodies such as The Institution of Engineering and Technology. This paper reports how a novel method of peer assessment called 360 degrees peer assessment (360PA) was used to train students to give good and insightful feedback to a piece of work, while addressing some of the traditional peer assessment limitations. 360PA was successfully applied to a variety of typical engineering assignments (technical reports, research dissertations, presentations and mathematical problems). Students and staff's quantitative and qualitative feedback were collected. Our experience suggests that the incorporation of various 360PA assignments during the degree is be...
A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback
TESL Canada Journal, 2010
In this article, I demonstrate how I planned and conducted a peer review training workshop to coach my students in giving and responding more effectively to peer feedback. The recommended training approach aims to raise students’ consciousness through analyzing the effectiveness of their peer feedback and evaluating the extent to which peers’ comments are incorporated into their subsequent revisions.
A Model to Develop Peer Feedback Skills in First-Year Engineering Students
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)
Giving and receiving feedback is a necessary, but often difficult skill for young engineers to acquire. We developed and piloted the delivery of a feedback model as part of the first-year engineering experience at the University of British Columbia. The approach is based on recognizing feedback as a form of professional communication, and that it requires practice to improve. We wove different aspects of communication skill development through two large newly-designed first-year introduction to engineering courses, building towards face-to-face feedback through a staged series of communication experiences. The full feedback model highlighted the nuances of faceto-face communication, and was called the "3×3", since it includes the three components involved in face-to-face feedback (sender, message, and receiver), each with three associated aspects. The sender uses appropriate words and body language, ensures proper interpretation, and is empathetic; the message is objective and non-judgmental, sufficiently detailed, and contains suggestions for improvement; and the receiver remains open and listening, acknowledges to the sender that they are listening, and clarifies to ensure understanding. Students applied what they had learned through an activity reviewing poster presentations from a major course design project. In the activity, they each had an opportunity to craft a feedback message before delivering the message face-to-face to a peer. Students then reflected on the feedback they received by summarizing the message, recognizing how the sender delivered the feedback, and identifying why the feedback was helpful. Student reflections were analyzed for themes from the 3×3 model. Students found feedback from peers particularly helpful when it was delivered in an appropriate and courteous manner, checked for proper interpretation, provided clear suggestions for improvement, and was coupled with praise of something that was done well. Providing students with a structured model allows them to follow a process in both providing effective face-to-face feedback, but also better appreciate why receiving feedback is beneficial in helping them improve.
Come Together: Peer Review with Energy Engineering Students
International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 2014
Based on the quantitative and qualitative analysis of collected data, this work examines energy engineering students' perceptions towards web-based peer assessment, distinguishing their role as reviewers and as feedback receivers. It analyses the type of feedback in an attempt to evaluate students' written communication skills and identifies which factors are related to students' use and appreciation of feedback. Taking in account the conclusions of our previous case-study in the civil engineering course at University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD, Vila Real, Portugal) the results of this study allow us to deepen the reflexion on how to improve the design and implementation of future web-based peer assessment tasks in engineering courses.
Incorporating student peer-review into an introduction to engineering design course
Frontiers in Education, …, 2005
We report on a project to improve the teaching of engineering design at the junior level. Peer review of student work is an integral part of collaborative learning and reform-driven engineering education. Yet successfully implementing this pedagogical technique requires significant amounts of instructor and class time. Furthermore, if adequate formative assessment does not emerge from peer review, the experience may devolve into "busy work" in the eyes of the student. Here, we give early results from an NSF-funded study using Calibrated Peer Review (a web-delivered, collaborative learning environment) to enhance learning in engineering design.
Application of peer review techniques in engineering education
2017
Improving students’ involvement in universities classes is a challenging problem. This problem is particularly relevant intechnical studies, even worst in computer related subjects where students tend to be very independent. In this paper, wepropose the use of peer review as a methodology that can help students to get more involved and to develop specific abilitieshas critical thinking. We have successfully used this approach in three different courses in different years (freshman andsophomore) and different studies. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected during these experiences to evaluatestudents’ opinion and performance. This information is analysed and discussed in the paper and our conclusions are alsohighlighted as well as some ideas for future improvement.
A J A L In-class peer feedback: Effectiveness and student engagement
2016
Peer review advocated by many researchers has figured prominently in process writing classrooms (K. Hyland & Hyland, 2006; Shehadeh, 2011; Yong, 2010). It allows and encourages students to take an active role in managing their own learning. The study reported here was conducted because of a general disengagement with peer review in an existing course, coupled with a lack of research on its impact and ways of raising student awareness relating to organisational features of thesis writing. It examined the impact, in terms of engagement and effect on writing and learning, of modifying existing peer review guidelines to make instructions more explicit and to prompt deeper engagement in the process. Students' uptake of suggestions in peer feedback and their responses to questions about the effectiveness of the peer review process were analysed. The findings show positive improvements in terms of engagement with the peer review process and in participants' attitudes to the process...
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 2015
Peer review feedback, developed to assist students with increasing the quality of group reports and developing peer review skills, was added to a master’s level Climate Change Policy and Planning unit. A pre- and post-survey was conducted to determine whether students found the process a valuable learning opportunity: 87% of students responding to the post-review survey indicated they saw benefit in both developing and receiving peer review feedback. Peer review design minimising the potential for plagiarism resulted in low levels of student concern surrounding plagiarism. Marks allocated by students were valid (consistent with the lecturer) and were generally reliable; however, distribution of marks had a higher variance where group report quality was low. Training on completing the peer review template could result in more reliable feedback. Consistent with the literature, the feedback developed during the peer review process focused on style and presentation preferentially to content. Seven out of eight group reports improved between report submissions, with all groups responding to peer review feedback. Peer review feedback and changes made to group reports indicated students had limited capacity to judge the quality of referencing and critical analysis.
Student Perception of Formative Peer Review
SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2020
The present paper covers our initial research findings of postgraduate student perceptions of formative in-class peer review in relation to their presentations, research, professional communication, and language skills. The paper also aims to assess the impact it may have on learning at advanced level of language training, and explores how peer review approach used in classes changes student perception of its benefits and challenges and contributes to the development of presentation, language and research skills. Besides the development of speaking skills, critical thinking and argumentation, peer review enables them to assess themselves better, to think more about the target audience and encourages better course and research engagement and collaborative learning. In our research, the students were asked to provide in-class peer review of presentations made by students on various aspects of their research as part of the connected curriculum framework established at the University Co...