India-South Korea Maritime Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific (original) (raw)

Congruence between India's and Republic of Korea's Maritime Strategies: Portends for Synergistic Collaboration in the Indo-Pacific

Korea Institute of Maritime Strategy Website, 2023

South Korea (ROK) acknowledges India as a ‘leading regional partner’; and intends to advance ‘special strategic partnership’ with the Country. Natural complementarities also exist between the Korean core lines of effort to ‘strengthen cooperation in critical domains of science and technology’; and its recognition of the Indian proficiencies in cutting-edge information technology and space sciences. This Paper explores various points of congruence between "India's Maritime Security Strategy-2016" and the South Korean "Strategy for the Indo-Pacific Region-2022"; and recommends various possibilities of collaborative maritime security endeavours between the two countries.

India as Maritime Security Partner in the Indo-Pacific, Chapter in IDSA book "Asian Strategic Review-2015"

Home to Asia’s resource-rich maritime commons and congested sea-lanes, the Indo-Pacific is fast emerging as a vital geo-strategic theatre of global power-play. With a key geographic position in the centre of the integrated space, India plays an important part in regional stability and security. Notwithstanding apprehensions that naval pro-activism in the Western Pacific may result in a confrontation with China, India is well positioned to partner regional states without threatening the security of other rising powers.

INDIA-JAPAN MARITIME SECURITY COOPERATION IN INDO-PACIFIC: CREATING A MARITIME POWER NEXUS IN BALANCING CHINA (2012-2017

Verity: Journal of International Relations, 2018

Di abad ke-21, keadaan keamanan Indo-Pasifik mengalami perubahan yang pesat, terutama dikarenakan oleh ekspansi maritim China dan melemahnya pengaruh Amerika Serikat di kawasan. Meresponi situasi ini, India dan Jepang sebagai kekuatan kawasan memutuskan untuk bekerja sama. Berdasarkan pidato Perdana Menteri Shinzo Abe pada 2007, India dan Jepang memiliki titik temu di bidang keamanan maritim. Mengikuti kembali berkuasanya Perdana Menteri Shinzo Abe pada 2012, Jepang telah memperluas lingkup keamannya di mana Jepang memandang pentingnya India sebagai mitra keamanan. Sementara itu, kebijakan "Act East" Perdana Menteri Narendra Modi telah mendorong India untuk mengambil peran yang lebih proaktif ke kawasan bagian timur, termasuk Jepang. India dan Jepang kemudian menyelaraskan kebijakan strategis mereka untuk memperkuat kerja sama maritim. Artikel ini menjelaskan implementasi kerja sama maritim India-Jepang dalam menyeimbangkan China di Indo-Pasifik.

India and Indonesia: Constructing a Maritime Partnership

Institute of South Asian Studies (National University of Singapore), 2018

The comprehensive strategic partnership between India and Indonesia, announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Joko Widodo during the former’s visit to Jakarta at the end of May 2018, is to be built around annual summit meetings between the leaders of the two nations, sustained high-level bureaucratic exchanges, substantive defence cooperation, including on arms production, stronger counter-terror collaboration, deeper economic integration and more expansive people-to-people relations. What stands out in this sweeping agenda is the maritime dimension. The joint maritime vision for the Indo-Pacific unveiled by the two leaders rests on the long-delayed recognition that the two nations share a vast oceanic neighbourhood. This has acquired an urgency thanks to the power shift in the waters of Asia marked by the rise of China and its deteriorating ties with the United States, and the sharpening of Beijing’s territorial disputes with its neighbours.

South Korea’s Approach to the Indo–Pacific

Jindal Journal of International Affairs

South Korea, along with Japan has been a traditional US ally in East Asia since 1945. The alliance grew even stronger with the Korean War. South Korea is still one of those nations where we can see a deep imprint and influence of the US mixed with their Japanese colonial past and their rich heritage. There are a few more important things to note about South Korea today. South Korea is highly dependent on the USA in terms of its security, even though its defence sector is highly developed and advanced. Its biggest security threat is the nuclear rogue state of North Korea. In recent decades, China and South Korea have been increasingly engaging in trade relations. China has always been the closest ally of North Korea, and with Seoul being disproportionately dependent on Beijing – has made it prudent for Seoul to have friendly ties with China, which can come in handy in the process of denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula

India-ASEAN Maritime Security Cooperation: The Indo-Pacific Context

ASEAN-India Development and Cooperation Report 2021: Avenues for Cooperation in Indo-Pacific (AIDCR-2021), 2020

The paper is part of ASEAN-India Report 2021 to be released by MEA, Govt of India on 10 Nov 20. It undertakes a realistic examination of the potential for cooperation between India and the ASEAN on holistic maritime security, which includes maritime safety and good order at sea, and also negotiating the complex issue of major-power maritime rivalry in the Indo-Pacific region. The analysis is based on the Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) model.

How Relevant is North-South Cooperation in the Conventional and Unconventional Maritime Domain of Asia?

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014

Quite contrary to the belief that South-South cooperation supplements North-South cooperation, it is not yet in a position to replace it in any significant way. In fact, there are still a lot of North-South development cooperation projects with signs that northern partners are overtly willing to transform unequal North-South engagement partnerships into what is now often referred to as 'true partnerships'. Denmark's historical cooperation ties with South Africa, for instance, are now narrowing in on the clean energy sector, with an agreement signed on 4 March 2013 between the two governments, whereby Denmark has given its commitment to help South Africa achieve low carbon economic growth by 2020. The Americans, who took the lead in promoting development cooperation projects in developing countries, way back in 1949 through President Truman's 'Bold New Program,' have openly shifted their 'pivot' from Middle East to Asia in the present century through "increased investment"-diplomatic, economic and strategic, in an attempt to reassure 'old allies' that Washington will always stand by while reinforcing its commitment to actively engage with the region through multilateral organizations. In the maritime arena, for instance, the US unequivocally came down on side of the ASEAN members, party to the conventional South China Sea dispute, by openly criticizing Chinese assertiveness, by holding military exercises with Vietnam and the Philippines and affirming the capability of the US-Philippine alliance in the South China Sea arena. Washington is playing the pivotal role in chalking out the most comprehensive and far-reaching trade and investment agreement involving Asia-Pacific states, the Trans Pacific Partnership, that has swelled from four to 11 members presently. In tackling unconventional security threat problems like sea piracy and mariti me terrorism, the US has undertaken several initiatives with littoral countries of Southeast Asia and India, well reflective of the growing maturity in North-South cooperation projects in the 21 st century. The present paper is an attempt to examine the North-South cooperative projects in the maritime domain of Southeast Asia where the 10-membered Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) have welcomed USA's 'pivot' to Asia as counterbalance against an aggressive China, and the " ASEAN Way," "Asian Way," or "Asia Pacific Way" of multilateralism," that involves conscious rejection by Asian leaders and policy elites of "imported models" of multilateralism and their call for liberalism that conforms to local realities and practices.