Minority Existence and the Subject of (Religious) Conversion (original) (raw)
Related papers
Minority Rights and Hindu Nationalism in India
Asian Journal of Law and Society, 2021
In this paper, I want to focus on some aspects of the political process in India that have an impact on the treatment of religious minorities. Much of the discussion on multicultural jurisdictions deals with differentiated citizenship rights that allow religious groups to maintain their normative universe. This literature shows the tensions surrounding individual and group rights. I want to approach the question of religious freedom from a rather different angle. I want to first focus on the protection of bare life in the face of religious violence and then examine the issue of conversion from one religion to another. The issues of human security and conversion are linked in India, since Hindu nationalists see Muslims as forcibly converted Hindus who should be reconverted. To highlight the importance of majoritarian nationalism rather than political systems in the treatment of religious minorities, I offer a brief comparison with China.
Crisis of Secularism and Changing Contours of Minority Politics in India
Asian Survey, 2021
This paper examines the changing nature of Muslim political mobilization in contemporary India in the context of Hindu nationalism’s ascendancy into power and the consequent crisis of traditional Muslim politics. Through an ethnographic case study of the Popular Front of India, we argue that a qualitatively new form of political mobilization is taking place among Indian Muslims centered on an articulation of “self-defense” against a “Hindu nationalist threat.” This politics of self-defense is constructed on the reconciliation of two contradictory processes: use of extensive legal pragmatism, and defensive ethnicization based on Islamic identity. The paper also examines the consequences of the emerging politics of competing ethnicization for even a normative and minimal idea of secularism and how it contributes to the process of decoupling of secularism and democracy in contemporary India.
Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 2022
The promulgation of the new state-level conversion laws in India or some changes in already existing ones by ordinances is premised upon various conspiracy theories of Hindu fundamentalists against Muslims. Implicit in and placed at the centre of these new anti-conversion laws and public debates thereof is the conspiracy theory of lovejihad that Muslim men lure Hindu women on the pretext of love and get them convert to Islam to eventually outnumber the Hindu majority. This article argues that the anticonversion laws in India result from anxieties of the dominant caste and class regarding gender and caste, leading to the imposition of the mainstream orthodox religious and political will upon the marginalized. The creation of anti-conversion laws is based on assumptions, fears, conspiracy theories, and moral and religious values primarily shared by the 'upper-caste' section across the political spectrum. Furthermore, it also shows a growing nexus between conservative religious forces and state apparatuses that restricts religious and social mobility of the marginalized sections through legal changes.
THE RISE OF HINDUTVA: IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIAN MUSLIM MINORITIES
Since Narendra Modi entered office and became India's prime minister, atrocities against minorities have increased, and the concept of 'Hindutva' has emerged as a frightening danger to the country's minorities. This research paper will examine the evolution of Hindutva ideology which took place in Indian society and will take into account the recent government of Narendra Modi as a supporter of Hindutva. It will make use of qualitative content analysis to evaluate the reason behind inter-religious conflicts. This study will also examine how Hindutva is associated with Hinduism and has antagonistic behavior towards other minorities especially Muslims in India. In addition to that this research will also focus upon the implications of adopting Hindutva policies upon Muslims, using the lens of social constructivism.
Religion and Politics in India: Implications for Religious Minorities (1990-2010
Journal of Appl ied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 2017
This paper attempts to examine critically the active role of religion in Indian politics in the years 1990-2010. Constitutionally, India is a secular state and does not claim any religion as her official religion. Despite having such a status, her attitude towards religious minorities is indomitable. This anomaly has provided Hindutva to play a key role in her politics. This role of Hindutva became prominent especially in the last two decades. The most significant departure from secularism is observed in the 1990s that set the stage for the rise of the right wing political parties. They have used Hindutva as an instrument of populism in their electoral campaigns. This became evident more and more in the emergence of the BJP as one of the major political parties on Indian political scene. This research attempts to analyze that how the emerging role of religion in the mainstream politics in India threatens the viability of India as a secular state. Besides, this also attempts to analyze how historically this role of religion in Indian politics has implications for minorities especially in the years 1990-2010. Descriptive-analytical method is being used to substantiate the questions.
Religious Diversity in Asia: Brill, 2019
A chapter in an edited book: The Indian case illustrates a continuing discomfort with religious conversion; particularly, religious conversion to non-Indic religions. The unique socio-political reality of India, comprising caste, a history of recurring conquests, forced conversion and delicate inter-religious relations, affects interactions and policy making in the Indian democracy. The current research analyzes alterations in India’s policy directives vis-à-vis the phenomenon of religious conversion throughout the years. The chapter examines power struggles and policy directives toward religious conversion from the time of Indian independence until the present time by mapping direct and indirect legislation and jurisdiction in India that has affected religious conversion.
India - Communalism, anti-conversion and religious freedom
2011
This briefing is concerned principally with recent trends of communal violence against Christians, the factors which underlie this, the state responses to such violence, and ongoing violations of religious freedom in law. India has a long history of religious pluralism, and compulsions towards mutual respect and violent intolerance continue to exist in parallel. The largest threat to pluralism comes from the Hindu nationalist ideology, espoused by a body of organisations known collectively as the Sangh Parivar (section 3.2). At its heart is the concept of a Hindu nation, excluding non-Hindus. The marginalisation, discrimination and violence faced by Muslims and Christians must be seen against this background. Communal violence is the outworking of this highly negative view of religious pluralism: ‘communalism’ sees relations between religious communities as a zero-sum game, in which conflict between religious groups is inevitable (section 3.3). Communal violence is most likely to occur in the context of long-standing antagonism along religious lines, with a sense among perpetrators that violence is justifiable and that police reactions would be absent, partisan or ineffective. The worst post-independence case of communal violence faced by Christians took place in Orissa in 2008, including brutal murders and rapes, widespread destruction of churches and property and forcible conversions to Hinduism. Three years later, there continue to be serious concerns over the rehabilitation of victims, the delivery of justice and community reconciliation (section 5.1). Karnataka continues to see the highest rate of incidents of violence against Christians. This occurs against the background of the intensive attacks around September 2008. In February 2011, the one-man Justice B.K. Somasekhara Commission of Inquiry released its report on the violence, which has been criticised as a whitewash for largely exonerating the Sangh Parivar and state Government, whereas the independent People’s Tribunal Enquiry by Justice Saldanha found evidence of pre-planned attacks carried out with the complicity of the state, and heavily criticised police brutality. Incidents of communal violence continue to take place in other states, as in previous years. Concern has been raised about an upward trend of violence in southern Rajasthan and western Madhya Pradesh, although this is not being reported consistently yet. Avenues of legal redress are theoretically strong, but the implementation of the law is weak, and negligent police responses are common. This has reinforced a culture of impunity, which needs to be reversed in order to ensure that inciters and perpetrators of communal violence expect to be brought to justice. The Government should do more to address systemic problems underlying communal violence, including tackling extremist organisations responsible for instigating it, addressing the failings of law enforcement authorities in response to it, and empowering its victims. The Government has made it a priority to introduce a pioneering bill to prevent, control and deal with the aftermath of communal violence. Following criticism of an earlier draft, the ruling UPA set up a working group to review the bill; this has produced a new draft, which continues to attract a number of key concerns (section 4.5). The Government should continue to consult with civil society to construct an effective bill. Overall, India boasts an excellent constitution and a strong body of legislation providing for the right to freedom of religion and belief. However, there remain several problematic areas of legislation. These include the de facto penalisation of Dalits who convert to religions other than Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism (section 4.3), which several Indian bodies and two UN committees have recommended be changed, and state-level anti-conversion laws (section 4.4), described by the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief as raising “serious human rights concerns”.