The Impact of Enhanced Resettlement Provision on Short-Term Prisoners: A Recidivism Study (original) (raw)
Related papers
How the Resettlement of Prisoners Promotes Desistance from Crime: Or Does It
This paper explores converges and divergences between two concepts which have rapidly become prominent in criminological and criminal justice literature over the past few years: 'resettlement' and 'desistance'. It identifies a shift in thinking about both the nature and the significance of work with prisoners who are making the transition from custody to community, which is increasingly being regarded as of central importance to the government's agenda of reducing re-offending. In the light of the new expectations they carry, it examines current and planned resettlement strategies and initiatives in England and Wales, and asks to what extent these are compatible with insights from theory and research about how and why most offenders eventually desist from crime.
How the resettlement of prisoners promotes desistance from crime
Criminology & Criminal Justice, 2006
The article considers current developments in the ‘resettlement’ of prisoners in the light of recent theory and research on factors promoting desistance from crime. While recognizing improvements promised by the Reducing Re-offending National Action Plan and the concept of ‘end-to-end’ offender management, it is argued that these are unlikely to reduce re-offending significantly without greater attention to individual offenders' mental processes and levels of selfmotivation, which are identified by the desistance literature (as well as much of the ‘what works’ literature) as critical factors in personal change. An account is given of a promising approach adopted in the ‘Resettlement Pathfinders’, where a cognitive-motivational programme was combined with practical services, with encouraging early results. However, concerns are expressed that even the most innovative approaches may be undermined by features of the broader context within which correctional services are delivered, ...
2015
The views expressed in this report are those of the authors, not necessarily those of the Home Office (nor do they reflect Government policy). RDS Occasional Paper No 83 The Research, Development and Statistics Directorate RDS is part of the Home Office. The Home Office's purpose is to build a safe, just and tolerant society in which the rights and responsibilities of individuals, families and communities are properly balanced and the protection and security of the public are maintained. RDS is also part of National Statistics (NS). One of the aims of NS is to inform Parliament and the citizen about the state of the nation and provide a window on the work and performance of government, allowing the impact of government policies and actions to be assessed. Therefore – Research Development and Statistics Directorate exists to improve policy making, decision taking and practice in support of the Home Office purpose and aims, to provide the public and Parliament with inform a t i o...
Does restorative justice affect reconviction? The fourth report from the evaluation of three schemes
2008
This information is also available on the Ministry of Justice website: www.justice.gov.uk/publications/research.htm Offender Management and Sentencing Analytical Services exist to improve policy making, decision taking and practice in support of the Ministry of Justice purpose and aims to provide the public and Parliament with information necessary for informed debate and to publish information for future use Disclaimer The views expressed are those of the authors and are not necessarily shared by the Ministry of Justice (nor do they represent Government policy).
2021
The Offender Rehabilitation Act (ORA) 2014 extended post-release supervision to the short sentence population, a cohort who have historically been neglected in penal discourse and were introduced as a part of the Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) reforms. The purpose of this thesis is to explore how resettlement is enacted by practitioners and experienced by individuals serving short sentences. This empirical research was undertaken in one case study area in England and Wales. The experiences of 35 practitioners and service users were captured, in order to gain a rich qualitative perspective of the newly re-designated resettlement prison; the experiences of transitioning through-the-gate into the community; post-sentence supervision; service user perspectives of navigating resettlement; and practitioner perspectives of on the ground practice in the Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC). Findings from this research reveal a dissonance between the aims and ambitions of TR and the real...
Key lessons from the RESET programme: Recommendations for the resettlement of young offenders
2010
The evaluation team 2 Foreword 3 Introduction 3 Resettlement as a problem 3 About RESET 4 Evaluation of RESET 4 Conclusions 7 Key recommendations 9 References 11 The evaluation team Centre for Social Research (CSR-Salford), University of Salford The centre specialises in working closely with policy makers, practitioners and the wider community to produce relevant, engaged and influential research. By combining a wide range of subject, methods and expertise, CSR-Salford brings a huge research knowledge base to bear on key social issues. ARCS UK ARCS is a national team of professional researchers with long experience and training in community safety, social inclusion, economic regeneration, youth offending, resettlement of offenders, community development and partnership working. The team has a track record for producing high-quality research and evaluation, committed to informing and improving future practice. www.arcs-ltd.com
Justice Quarterly, 2016
We analyzed data collected for a large multi-site evaluation of 12 prisoner reentry programs in 12 states to examine the impact of pre-release services on time to rearrest and number of rearrests up to 56 months post-release for male offenders. A two-stage matching quasi-experimental design was used to define the comparison groups and multivariate models were used to examine the relationships among service and program receipt and recidivism. Participation in the reentry program was associated with longer time to arrest and fewer arrests after release. However, the specific services delivered as part of the program showed modest or inconsistent impacts on recidivism. Services that focused on individual change were more beneficial than services that focused on practical skills and needs. Practitioners should consider careful sequencing of program and service delivery in prison, linking in-prison services to post-release assistance, and evaluating all services and programs for fidelity and effectiveness.