Aesthetic Bodies: Posing on Sites of Violence in India, c.1857-1900 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Insurgent Citizenship: Photographs of War and Peace in British India
AbstractDOI This article focuses on the deployment of the camera during a moment of acute political crisis in nineteenth-century India, when both the significance and the scope of British power were highly unstable, arguing that photography’s unique formal features enabled colonials to picture a precarious imperial sovereignty as a viable mode of political administration. The ability of photography to objectify and “other" colonized populations has been well documented, but the efficacy of imperialism as a mode of imperial governance was as much a function of imagining shared political horizons as it was about constructing divisive racial hierarchies. The levelling aesthetic of photography—its capacity to draw heterogeneous peoples into what Christopher Pinney has termed a “common epistemological space”—meant that it could serve as a visual register for the elusive connective tissue of imperial subjecthood, effectively reifying a useful political abstraction. Yet, as much as British sovereign authority could be embodied by this visual logic, British identity could simultaneously be dissolved by the homogenizing grammar of the medium. Looking in particular at the palliative, diplomatic role played by the photographic portraiture of Dr John Nicholas Tresidder in the immediate aftermath of the Indian Rebellion (1857–59), this article assesses how photography engaged with warfare’s social upheavals in complex, richly textured and unpredictable ways.
Picturing the West India regiments : race, empire, and photography, c.1850-1914
2018
Despite the enthusiasm of local studios, visitors to the Caribbean, and military officers for capturing images of the West India Regiments (WIRs), photographs have often been neglected as a source for the history the British Army’s first ‘official’ black units (established in the 1790s). Relegated to the covers or glossy middle pages of books, the insights that the contested image of the WIRs can provide have been ignored. The use of photographs of the WIRs solely for illustrative purposes has meant that their role in reflecting and shaping broader ideas about race and empire has not been fully explored. This thesis will argue that the varied and sometimes contradictory ways in which the rank-and-file of the West India Regiments have been represented visually reflect their ambivalent position within the British Empire’s racial hierarchies. Whilst as colonial subjects of African descent they were designated as ‘others’ with racialised physical and cultural traits, their place within ...
Art History
At the Royal Academy Exhibition of 1880, Val Prinsep’s vast group portrait of British officials and Indian potentates was singled out for virulent criticism because of its apparently aggressive interaction with the surrounding display. One critic claimed that the portrait of the Anglo-Indian crowd at the ‘Imperial Assemblage’ held in Delhi in 1877 ‘suffers terribly from its discordancy with everything in the exhibition, while it ruins the effects of every other picture, not only in the vicinity, but while the glare of its colouring haunts the vitiated eye’. As well as upsetting the visual harmony of the RA, Prinsep’s painting (the result of many tense sittings with recalcitrant Indian royalty) made an uncomfortable political point. It was the demographics of the Raj that seemed to cause offence: the visually disjunctive interaction of the ‘many-tinted actors’ whose portraits comprised the work was said to ‘violate’ artistic ‘laws and ordinances’. A key political reality of empire – cross-cultural interaction – therefore undermined acceptable aesthetic conventions. This paper argues that the disorientating aesthetics of Prinsep’s The Imperial Assemblage held at Delhi was encoded as a crisis of imperial governance, disrupting the sober visual strategies that had emerged in British portraiture to secure social cohesion. Prinsep’s commission – the most prestigious and expansive issued to a painter by a nineteenth-century colonial government – provides a privileged contrapuntal point from which to interrogate the politics of interaction in High Victorian portraiture (frequently overlooked in favour of the swagger portraits of the Georgian and Edwardian eras). The colourful heterogeneity of the Indian rulers’ regal dress stood in marked contrast to the monochromatic palette that dominated Victorian portraits – an aesthetic uniformity that in numerous instances had pictured a fraught parliamentary system in terms of an overarching political stability. There was thus a great amount at stake in portraits interacting in harmonious ways; and yet, within the available framework of colonial aesthetics, the ruling classes of the Raj could not be pictured interacting coherently. Consequently, I argue, there was a sort of aesthetic insurgency at the RA in 1880, as Prinsep’s motley assembly registered as an unruly visual assault.
Photography in Colonial and Postcolonial India as an Agent of Cultural Dominance
2009
This research paper explores the use of photography in colonial India. The thesis of the paper is that British photographers, through their choice of subjects and editing of their works, created a romanticized image of India as the British wished to see it. More recent photography has focused on the reality of the lives of the Indian people. Thus photography has moved from from functioning as an agent of colonial domination and political propaganda to a tool used to bring aid and compassion to those in need. Photography in India 4 Introduction Photography has been propagated as a tool that conveys reality. It represents the signified – the thing that has been photographed. In order for the subject to be represented in a photograph, it must have physically been in front of the lens. That very quality attributed to photography led to its use as a tool by colonial Britain to exert control over its established colonies. This paper discusses the use of photography in India as an agent of...
Moving Pictures: Imagining the Past Through Courtly Photographs of British India
2016
A little boy dressed in silken finery reclines on a takht of velvet coverings, an embroidered cap sitting askew on his head as his dark eyes look searchingly into the camera. Elsewhere, a young prince with formidable whiskers and a cunningly fashioned turban sits upright in an elaborately carved chair, a sword held casually to the floor in one hand, while his gaze wanders into the distance. In a different setting, four noblemen attired in similarly handsome headgear, flank a British officer sitting erect in his elegant uniform; while the others avoid the glare of the lens, one of the noblemen glances furtively into it. All three situations describe photographs of various members of the Indian aristocracy, taken during the British Raj. The images are of interest not just because of their compositional idiosyncrasies or the once-redoubtable standing of their subjects, nor even because of some vague, generalized notion of their historicity. If anything, it is a combination of all three, and more, for these photographs, and hundreds of others like them, are neither simply frivolous souvenirs of their own time and space that have no meaning in a post-modern world, nor are they some bloodless ‘document’ of Indian history whose resonance is confined to that definition alone. What they are is a potent and eloquent connection to a past that is both integral to the South Asian identity, as well as almost alien and inaccessible to it.
The Portrait's Journey: The Image, Social Communication and Martyr-Making in Colonial India
Bhagat Singh, the revolutionary nationalist executed by the British in 1931, continues to be an enormously popular figure in contemporary India, immediately recognizable in ubiquitous posters, stickers and placards by his distinctive hat. This article uncovers the story behind Bhagat Singh’s original ‘hat-on’ photograph by tracing the portrait’s journey from the time it was taken, in 1929, to the early 1930s, demonstrating how it both illustrated and popularized Bhagat Singh’s death in terms of a martyrdom. The portrait was devised as a tactic of political subversion and intended as revolutionary propaganda, although it became more widely interpreted as an icon of defiant nationalism and a symbol of imperial injustice. The image quickly morphed from its original format, and rapidly circulated in the form of reproductions, paintings and drawings, travelling well beyond the confines of the literate domain, making a decisive impact on the charged political landscape of the early 1930s.
Visualising Order: Photography and the Production of the Colonial Police in India
History of Photography, 2021
Stationed in cities, towns and villages across the Indian subcontinent, the colonial police were a ubiquitous presence under the British Raj. Visuality was central to the policing project; the police’s effectiveness was predicated on colonial subjects’ recognition of police authority. Photographs of policepersons and police buildings, appearing in manuals, histories and memoirs, private albums, imperial educational propaganda and on postcards, testify to the pervasiveness of the policing institution within the colonial landscape and the institution’s commitment to visuality. The sheer volume of these photographs invites consideration. While existing scholarship on the colonial police and photography has largely focused on how the police harnessed the medium in their efforts to visualise colonial criminals, this article considers photography as a means of producing the police to make legible the imperial social order. Various photographs of policepersons and police buildings – mundane and propagandistic images when considered within the broader history of colonial Indian photography– index imperial interactions, revealing the visual language the police relied on to assert their authority.
Panoramas, Patriotic Voyeurism, and the “Indian Mutiny”
Victorian Literature and Culture
The panorama was from its outset a medium of contemporary history. This article examines its contribution to initial historical narratives about the “Indian Mutiny” (1857–58). Nineteenth-century critics often saw the form as voyeuristic, while modern scholars have critiqued its chauvinistic patriotism. The article uses panorama paratexts, adverts, and reviews to recover the visitor experience and to compare these with contemporary would-be historical accounts of the mutiny. I ask, Was it possible for panoramic representations of the mutiny to avoid jingoism? And what can this case study tell us about mid-nineteenth-century approaches to historical distance?My analysis of 1850s panoramas of the mutiny (by Burford, Hamilton, Marshall, and Gompertz) shows that when they depicted graphic violence, it did not suppress visitor numbers but did lead to accusations of voyeurism. Reviewers declared that the events were too temporally and emotionally proximate to be treated as history. Initial...