Adding Perspective to the Bibliometric Mapping Using Bidirected Graph (original) (raw)
Related papers
Visualizing bibliometric networks
This chapter provides an introduction into the topic of visualizing bibliometric networks. First, the most commonly studied types of bibliometric networks (i.e., citation, co-citation, bibliographic coupling, keyword co-occurrence, and co-authorship networks) are discussed, and three popular visualization approaches (i.e., distance-based, graph-based, and timeline-based approaches) are distinguished. Next, an overview is given of a number of software tools that can be used for visualizing bibliometric networks. In the second part of the chapter, the focus is specifically on two software tools: VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer. The techniques used by these tools to construct, analyze, and visualize bibliometric networks are discussed. In addition, tutorials are offered that demonstrate in a step-by-step manner how both tools can be used. Finally, the chapter concludes with a discussion of the limitations and the proper use of bibliometric network visualizations and with a summary of some ongoing and future developments.
2018
In this paper, we present the results of the study on the development of social network analysis (SNA) discipline and its evolution over time, using the analysis of bibliographic networks. The dataset consists of articles from the Web of Science Clarivate Analytics database and those published in the main journals in the field (70,000+ publications), created by searching for the key word "social network*." From the collected data, we constructed several networks (citation and two-mode, linking publications with authors, keywords and journals). Analyzing the obtained networks, we evaluated the trends in the field`s growth, noted the most cited works, created a list of authors and journals with the largest amount of works, and extracted the most often used keywords in the SNA field. Next, using the Search path count approach, we extracted the main path, key-route paths and link islands in the citation network. Based on the probabilistic flow node values, we identified the mo...
2012
This text is based on a translation of a chapter in a handbook about network analysis (published in German) where we tried to make beginners familiar with some basic notions and recent developments of network analysis applied to bibliometric issues (Havemann and Scharnhorst 2010). We have added some recent references.
Use of Social Network Analysis in Bibliometric Researches
The impact of published works is measured and evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively by bibliometric researches. In addition to this, various findings related to scientific communication are also obtained from bibliometric studies by analyzing certain characteristics of documents or publications. In recent years, as a result of increased interest to bibliometric studies, different scientific methods and techniques are observed for bibliometrics. Social network analysis (SNA) has also taken its place in the literature as a method which is frequently used in bibliometric studies, especially in the past few years. SNA can simply be defined as examining the social structure and its impacts. This method comprehends the social structure as a network, which connects the actors and the knots of the relationships between these actor pairs. These actors can be people, as well as groups, institutions and even countries. SNA is frequently used by several disciplines such as sociology, anthropology, social psychology, communications and economics. Using SNA, researchers examine the structure of communities, try to describe the network structures, and model the existing connections by visualizing the relationships between the communities. The aim of this study is to review the use of SNA in bibliometric studies.
Toward a Semantic Graph of Scientific Publications: A Bibliometric Study
International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 2020
The term "scientific publication" includes several types of scientific communications and digital broadcasts that scientific researchers make of their work towards their peers and an audience of specialists. These publications describe in detail the studies or experiments carried out and the conclusions drawn from them by the authors. They undergo an examination of the value of the results and the rigor of the scientific method used for the work carried out. In this paper we evaluated the quality of a scientific article on the subject (topic), based on its citations and where is it cited, we based on the Topic modeling theme with the choice of LDA algorithms applied to the corpus Nips (1987-2016) for detecting all subjects of each paper and there citations in a first step then on the citations of each article of the corpus and on the Sentiment Analysis using a lexical based approaches. Then we created a csv file containing the link of each paper with the other cited papers (relation cited-citing), and finally generated a semantic graph between these publications.
Network-based statistical comparison of citation topology of bibliographic databases
Scientific Reports, 2014
Modern bibliographic databases provide the basis for scientific research and its evaluation. While their content and structure differ substantially, there exist only informal notions on their reliability. Here we compare the topological consistency of citation networks extracted from six popular bibliographic databases including Web of Science, CiteSeer and arXiv.org. The networks are assessed through a rich set of local and global graph statistics. We first reveal statistically significant inconsistencies between some of the databases with respect to individual statistics. For example, the introduced field bow-tie decomposition of DBLP Computer Science Bibliography substantially differs from the rest due to the coverage of the database, while the citation information within arXiv.org is the most exhaustive. Finally, we compare the databases over multiple graph statistics using the critical difference diagram. The citation topology of DBLP Computer Science Bibliography is the least consistent with the rest, while, not surprisingly, Web of Science is significantly more reliable from the perspective of consistency. This work can serve either as a reference for scholars in bibliometrics and scientometrics or a scientific evaluation guideline for governments and research agencies.
Journal of Informetrics, 2016
We introduce the author keyword coupling analysis (AKCA) method to visualize the field of information science (2006-2015). We then compare the AKCA method with the author bibliographic coupling analysis (ABCA) method in terms of first-and all-author citation counts. We obtain the following findings: (1) The AKCA method is a new and feasible method for visualizing a discipline's structure, and the ABCA and AKCA methods have their respective strengths and emphases. The relation within the ABCA method is based on the same references (knowledge base), whereas that within the AKCA method is based on the same keywords (lexical linguistic). The AKCA method appears to provide a less detailed picture, and more uneven sub-areas of a discipline structure. The relationships between authors are narrow and direct and feature multiple levels in AKCA. (2) All-author coupling provides a comprehensive picture; thus, a complete view of a discipline structure may require both first-and all-author coupling analyses. (3) Information science evolved continuously during the second decade of the World Wide Web. The KDA (knowledge domain analysis) camp became remarkably prominent, while the IR camp (information retrieval) experienced a further decline in hard IR research, and became significantly smaller; Patent analysis and Open Access emerged during this period. Mapping of Science and Bibliometric evaluation also experienced substantial growth.
1 A Comparison of Two Techniques for Bibliometric
2016
VOS is a new mapping technique that can serve as an alternative to the well-known technique of multidimensional scaling. We present an extensive comparison between the use of multidimensional scaling and the use of VOS for constructing bibliometric maps. In our theoretical analysis, we show the mathematical relation between the two techniques. In our experimental analysis, we use the techniques for constructing maps of authors, journals, and keywords. Two commonly used approaches to bibliometric mapping, both based on multidimensional scaling, turn out to produce maps that suffer from artifacts. Maps constructed using VOS turn out not to have this problem. We conclude that in general maps constructed using VOS provide a more satisfactory representation of a data set than maps constructed using well-known multidimensional scaling approaches.