Christian Mueller-Goldingen, Aristoteles, Politik: Einleitung und Kommentar, Band 1: Bücher 1, 3, 7 und 8, Wissenschaftliche Kommentare zu griechischen und lateinischen Schriftstellern, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 2016, viii+340 pp., ISBN 978-3 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Some Remarks on the First Book of Aristotle's Politics
Wisdom , 2018
This article is devoted to a sequential analysis of the first book of Aristotle's Politics. It suggests an interpretation of the classical problem of natural hierarchy of men as it described in the first book of the treatise. In this book, Aristotle examines seven commonly held definitions of a slave – four " natural " and three " conventional " ones – and then offers his own eighth definition, placed right in the middle between nature and convention. The article exclusively deals with the first book of Politics and avoids invoking other books of the treatise as well as other works of Aristotle because in classical political philosophy every statement is highly contextualized and could not be simply quoted in order to prove or disprove any point of view without preceding deep examination.
Araucaria. History, Philosophy, Art and Humanities», ISSN: 1575-6823 (Print), ISSN: 2340-2199 (Online). , 2022
Aristotle’s conception of the politeia (regime, constitution) as a distinctive feature of the historical experience of the polis is a key aspect in his treatment of politics. Part of this discussion deals with Aristotle’s attempt to locate and define the qualities of the politeia as the most valid criteria for a historical account of the polis. These are the qualities I intend to address in this chapter. In section 1 I consider the role of the politeia in Aristotle’s account of the history of the polis after it deviates from the monarchic model of government. In section 2 I tackle the problem of the politeia’s intelligibility inside the polis understood as a “community of interpretation”. Finally, in section 3 I address the politeia as an expression of the unity of the polis and discuss its quality to unify actions (praxeis) aimed at a common goal. Here I argue that it is the politeia’s “unifying quality” that highlights the causal connections underlying actions that regard the polis. The politeia helps to unmask historical causation between the actions. Within the context of the politeia, the historical account of the polis connects actions which outside the framework of the politeia do not appear to be so closely related. Key-words: politeia’s intelligibility, polis’ history, political justice, Aristotle on the unity of the polis, Cleisthenes’ reform, Aristotle on history and poetry.
Aristotle Politics: A commentary
In this commentary on Aristotle's 'Politics', I aim to offer a detailed and insightful exploration of one of the most pivotal works in political philosophy. By delving into Aristotle's Politics, I will provide not only a concise summary of its key ideas and themes but also endeavor to present a thought-provoking commentary that sheds light on its significance and enduring relevance. Aristotle's Politics stands as a seminal treatise on the fundamental nature of politics, examining the organization and functioning of human societies, the purpose of governance, and the ideal state. Within its pages, Aristotle presents a systematic analysis of political structures, forms of government, and the virtues and vices inherent in different political systems. Moreover, he addresses the complexities of human nature, the role of ethics in politics, and the pursuit of the common good. Through my commentary, I will dissect Aristotle's arguments and elucidate the philosophical foundations that underpin his ideas. I will explore his notions of justice, the nature of citizenship, and the relationship between the individual and the state. Additionally, I will delve into his views on the ideal state and its components, such as the rule of law, education, and the distribution of resources. Please note that the bold text represents a summary of the original passage from Aristotle, while the italicized text indicates my reflection and commentary on Aristotle's ideas. This formatting convention serves to distinguish between the two types of content and provide clarity for the reader. The purpose of the bold text, which summarizes the original passage from Aristotle, is to condense and encapsulate the main points or essential arguments made by Aristotle in his work. It aims to present a concise overview of Aristotle's ideas, enabling readers to grasp the core concepts without delving into the minutiae of the original text. On the other hand, the italicized text signifies my personal thoughts, interpretations, and analysis in response to Aristotle's ideas. It serves as a platform for me to engage with Aristotle's work, offering my own perspective, critique, or support. The commentary can expand upon the original passage, provide additional context or examples, raise questions, or explore the implications of Aristotle's ideas in contemporary contexts. By utilizing this formatting approach of bold and italicized text, I have tried to provide a clear structure to the writing. This structure allows readers to easily distinguish between Aristotle's original ideas and my reflections, fostering a deeper understanding of the text. Furthermore, it encourages readers to critically engage with the original passage, consider multiple viewpoints, and form their own interpretations based on the interplay between the bold summary and the italicized commentary.
The second Book of Aristotle's Politics
"Res Publica Litterarum". Documentos de trabajo del Grupo de Investigación 'Nomos', 2008
The second Book of the Politics has been object of multiple considerations, but it has called the attention of the scholars mainly because of its detailed criticism of Plato's political projects, especially the Republic. In fact Aristotle devotes 6 of the 12 chapters of Book II to examine Plato's proposals. Most of the scholarly contributions are focused on the criticism of Plato trying either to demonstrate the justice of Aristotle's reproaches or to invalidate his chapters on the basis of a supposed inexactness of his words.
Notes for a Discussion of Aristotle's Politics
These are some notes for a multi-day discussion of Aristotle's seminal work on the organization of cities, the realization of virtue, and other foundational issues in political theory.
Philosophy of the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle, Review
Philosophy Compass, 2012
bstract From the first century BCE onwards, philosophers started to write commentaries on those Aristotle's treatises that were meant for the internal use of his school. Plato's works had been commented on already earlier, the first reported commentary originates in the 300s BCE. Commentaries are treatises that follow an object text in a more or less linear fashion. The format was not unknown before the first century BCE but new in extensive philosophical use. This review essay focuses on authors who commented on Aristotle's works. The commentaries emerged when Platonists and Aristotelians observed the need to teach the philosophy of these ancient masters to their students and to systematise their philosophy to respond to rival schools. In the late ancient schools, Plato and Aristotle were considered great thinkers, whose views needed to be studied carefully when considering any matter at hand. Many also argued that, despite the initial appearance to the contrary, there is no deep disagreement between Plato and Aristotle but, rather, a division of labour; Aristotle is dominant in natural philosophy and Plato in theology. However, this harmony thesis was not universally accepted. Despite their respect for Plato and Aristotle, the commentators were not mere followers of these authors. They developed, criticised and transformed the doctrines in significant ways, not only by suggesting different answers to the same questions but also by transforming the questions themselves.
Reflections and Implications of Discipline and Civilisation in the Political Thought of Aristotle
2015
The existence and enormous potentials of the state as a force for good or evil have prompted philosophic reflections, from the earliest of times, on its origin and nature, and on how it can be better organised to serve the interests of its humanity. From Socrates to Plato, and down to contemporary times, the content of the exploration has remained almost the same, with variations only seen in the nature and manner of the investigations. However, Aristotle continues to stand out as unique in that he laid the foundation for scientific contemplations in political thought. Any wonder then why his writings remained so influential throughout the Middle Ages and up to the present day. This paper is an attempt to go back in time to trace the influence and substance of that era many political thinkers would agree was indeed the 'Golden Age' of philosophical thought. The paper contextualizes broad issues deemed critical in the cognition of Aristotle’s political thought. The focal poin...