The Bali Roadmap for Global Climate Policy—New Horizons and Old Pitfalls (original) (raw)
Related papers
Global climate change policies: from Bali to Copenhagen and beyond
Policy Quarterly
In early December 2007, the island of Bali in Indonesia hosted the 13th Conference of the Parties (COP13) to the United National Framework Convention on Climate Change and the 3rd Conference of the Parties serving as a Meeting of the Parties (COP/MOP3) to the Kyoto Protocol. Attended by almost 11,000 participants and observers from across the globe, Bali marked the climax of a period of unparalleled international climate change summitry (Chasek, 2007). The decisions taken at COP13 have been variously hailed as a ‘major breakthrough’ (Egenhofer, 2007) and as an utter failure – ‘the mother of all no-deals’, to quote Sunita Narain (2008) and ‘even worse than the Kyoto Protocol’ according to George Monbiot (2007)
Climate Change Negotiations: the Road from Bali to Poznan
NTS Alert, 2009
The United Nations Climate Change Conference in Bali in December 2007 was a landmark meeting which culminated in the creation of the Bali Action Plan -a roadmap for a two-year process of formal negotiations in devising the specifics for a post-Kyoto Protocol agreement -to mitigate and adapt to the problem of global warming. This edition of NTS Alert therefore takes a look at how far negotiations have come a year on since Bali.
Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 2010
The Copenhagen Summit did not conclude the 2 years negotiation process initiated in Bali in 2007. Ten official meetings among parties were not sufficient to reach a conclusion on the future of the international climate change regime after 2012. This paper summarizes the main issues addressed by the parties under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Kyoto Protocol tracks in the course of 2009, the longest year ever for climate change negotiations, and tries to explain the reasons behind the Summit's failures. Furthermore, an overview of the main points of the Copenhagen Accord is provided together with its implications and relation with the UNFCCC process.r eel_668 104..121
Rethinking the Legal Form and Principles of a New Climate Agreement
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014
The Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP) provided a mandate to negotiate a new climate agreement by 2015, entering into force from 2020. This chapter examines the legal form and principles of a new agreement. It is argued that the ADP allows states to choose between distinctive options, including the adoption of a new protocol, amendment to the UNFCCC, or a combination including decisions by the Conference of the Parties (COP). The legal form of each of the elements of the agreement must also be assessed. Finally, it is necessary to overcome the binary distinction between the commitments of developed and developing states, and establish a more differentiated and dynamic architecture. 3 2. The Durban Platform of Enhanced Action (ADP) 1 Discussions on legal form of a new agreement have weighed on the UNFCCC negotiation process for several years. The 2007 Bali Action Plan 2 set up the Ad-Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action (AWG-LCA) with the purpose of reaching an 'agreed outcome' on long-term cooperative action on climate change in 2009. The term 'agreed outcome', however, does not provide clarity on the legal form or character of the outcome this process should produce, nor did the Bali decision contain a clear mandate to negotiate the legal character of such outcome. Since the Bali Action Plan, many Parties have repeatedly expressed their view that such outcome needs to be of legally binding character. Several Parties submitted proposals for various legally binding instruments under FCCC Article 17.
Beyond Bali: Strategic Issues for the post-2012 Climate Change Regime. CEPS Paperbacks. April 2008
2008
The European Climate Platform (ECP) is a joint initiative of the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) in Brussels and the Climate Policy Research Programme (Clipore) of the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra) in Stockholm. Established in 2005, the ECP aims to facilitate interaction within the policy research community, mainly but not exclusively in Europe. Its working methods consist of bringing together a select number of policy-makers, negotiators and experts to vigorously debate key topics in the area of international climate change policy and to widely disseminate its conclusions. The ECP actively seeks dialogue with policy-makers and other stakeholders while being dedicated to academic excellence, unqualified independence and policy relevance. The ECP is governed by a steering group, drawn from government and academia.
Bringing the Copenhagen Global Climate Change Negotiations to Conclusion
CESifo Economic Studies, 2009
In this paper we discuss the global negotiations now underway and aimed at achieving new climate change mitigation and other arrangements after 2012 (the end of the Kyoto commitment period). These were initiated in Bali in December 2007 and are scheduled to conclude by the end of 2009 in Copenhagen. As such, this negotiation is effectively the second round in ongoing global negotiations on climate change and further rounds will almost certainly follow. We highlight both the vast scope and vagueness of the negotiating mandate, the many outstanding major issues to be accommodated between negotiating parties, the lack of a mechanism to force collective decision making in the negotiation, and their short time frame. The likely lack of compliance with prior Kyoto commitments by several OECD countries (some to a major degree), the effective absence in Kyoto of compliance/ enforcement mechanisms, and growing linkage to non-climate change areas (principally trade) all further complicate the task of bringing the negotiation to conclusion. The major clearage we see that needs to be bridged in the negotiations is between OECD countries on the one hand, and lower wage, large population, rapidly growing countries (China, India, Russia, Brazil) on the other. JEL Code: F13.
Negotiating an Intractable Climate Deal: The Kyoto Process and Beyond
Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, 2013
Climate change, commonly known as global warming, has threatened the very survival of the planet earth. Being a global problem it requires global actions but international actions to combat the climate cataclysm have been largely unsuccessful due to countries’ self-interested behavior. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Kyoto Protocol itself have tried to control emission of heat-trapping gases but failed due to incomplete participation. Such grim situation is also evident in other landmark climate summits where the rift between developed North and impoverished South and their bargaining over burden-sharing responsibility for climate change have contributed to the inefficacy of any effort to reduce emission. However, now the clash of interest is not only limited to developed and developing worlds, there are other shades of conflict and signs of political regrouping. This article will briefly narrate the landmark climate conferences, held under...