Evaluating the Implementation and Outcomes of Government Policies and Programs in Public Administration in Jordan (original) (raw)

Abstract

In the realm of public administration, the effective implementation of government policies and programs is of paramount importance for achieving desired societal outcomes. This research aims to critically evaluate the implementation processes and assess the outcomes of various government policies and programs within the domain of public administration in Jordan. By shedding light on the efficacy of these initiatives, our study seeks to contribute to the improvement of public governance and decision-making. Through a comprehensive literature review, we analyze existing research and theoretical frameworks pertaining to government policies and programs. The review identifies gaps in the literature, laying the groundwork for our investigation. Employing a mixed-methods approach, we gather data through surveys, interviews, and case studies to assess the experiences of both administrators and recipients of these policies and programs. Our research design enables us to gain a holistic understanding of the challenges, successes, and lessons learned from the implementation process. Upon analyzing the collected data, our findings reveal crucial insights into the efficacy of different policy implementation strategies. We identify factors that have facilitated or hindered the successful execution of these initiatives. Additionally, we explore the impacts of policies and programs on the intended beneficiaries and the broader community. The discussion section interprets the results in the context of the research objectives, providing meaningful implications for public administration practitioners, policymakers, and researchers. By linking our findings to existing literature, we contribute to the refinement of current public administration theories and practices. This research holds significant implications for enhancing the formulation, execution, and evaluation of government policies and programs. By addressing the identified gaps in the literature and presenting empirical evidence, our study provides valuable insights for the design of more effective and inclusive policies. Ultimately, our goal is to contribute to the advancement of public administration practices, promoting equitable and sustainable development for societies.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (15)

  1. References: Bovens, M. (2010). Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5), 946-967.
  2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  3. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
  6. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Guest, G., Namey, E. E., & Mitchell, M. L. (2006). Collecting qualitative data: A field manual for applied research. Sage Publications.
  8. Grove, S. K., Burns, N., & Gray, J. R. (2019). The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (8th ed.). Elsevier.
  9. Hill, M. J. (2017). The public policy process. Routledge.
  10. Johnson, B. L., & Williams, C. R. (2015). Effective policies and practices in American education: A systematic approach to examining quality. SAGE Publications.
  11. Lester, J. P., & Frisch, N. C. (2019). Outcome measurement and program evaluation standards of practice (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  12. O'Toole Jr, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2019). Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural networks with managerial networks. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 474-482.
  13. Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; or, why it's amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation of ruined hopes. University of California Press.
  14. Smith, S. R., Bartlett, E. E., & Jones, M. (2018). Public policy and program evaluation. Sage Publications.
  15. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.