Is the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts limited in the management of patients with end-stage liver disease? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Liver Transplantation, 1996
582 days (range, 1 to 1,095), 35 patients underwent transplantation, 21 patients died, and 29 patients are still alive and did not undergo transplantation. Technical complications were observed in 7% of patients and new onset of clinical encephalopathy in 37%. The 30-day mortality rate after TIPS was 13%. Actuarial survival was 60% at 1 and 3 years. Child class C and urgent TIPS were shown to be two independent predictor factors for mortality. TIPS was shown to be a valuable procedure, not only as a bridge to OLT but also as palliation for bleeding from portal hypertension in patients who were not candidates for either surgical shunt or OLT. However, its role in bleeding patients with acceptable liver function needs further investigation. Copyright 0 1996 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases procedure and the possible morbidity and mortality associated with shunt procedure itself. We report our experience in patients who underwent TIPS regardless of their eligibility for OLT with an emphasis on the incidence of technical complications associated with this procedure, assessment of clinical course, and long-term survival.
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, 2012
CONTEXT: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the non-surgical treatment option with low level of morbi-mortality and possibility of accomplishment in patients with severe hepatic dysfunction which aims at decompressing the portal system treating or reducing the portal hypertension complications. OBJECTIVE: Outline the profile analyze global and early mortality, and the complications presented by cirrhotic patients who underwent TIPS for treatment of digestive hemorrhage by portal hypertension. METHOD: Retrospective study based on the data bank of cirrhotic patients' medical reports, who underwent TIPS for digestive hemorrhage by portal hypertension treatment who did not respond to clinical endoscopic treatment, and were assisted from 1998 to 2010 in the Liver Transplant Service at a university hospital. The study was approved by the Committee of Ethics and Research. RESULTS: The sample was comprised of 72 (84.7%) patients, being 57 (79.2%) males, average age ...
Surgery, 1999
Since the advent of liver transplantation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), the role of surgical portosystemic shunts in the treatment of portal hypertension has changed. However, we have continued to use portosystemic shunts in patients with noncirrhotic portal hypertension and in patients with Child's A cirrhosis. We performed 48 surgical portosystemic shunt procedures between 1988 and 1998. The outcomes of these patients were evaluated to assess the efficacy of this treatment. Data from 39 of 48 patients were available for analysis. The average follow-up was 42 months. Liver function generally remained stable for the patients; only 2 patients had progressive liver failure and required transplant procedures. Gastrointestinal bleeding (3 patients), encephalopathy (3 patients), and shunt thrombosis (3 patients) were rare. Patient survival was 81% at 4 years, similar to survival with liver transplantation (P = .22). Surgical shunts remain the treatment of choice for prevention of recurrent variceal bleeding in patients with good liver function and portal hypertension.
Liver Research – Open Journal, 2017
During almost half of century period, in the Department of Surgery of Portal Hypertension and Pancreatoduodenal Zone of the JSC "Republican Specialized Center of Surgery (named after Academician V. Vakhidov"), portosystemic shunting (PSSh in the traditional variant) was performed on 925 patients suffering with portal hypertension (PH). Results and competitive prospects of PSSh in patients with PH are represented in this article. In accordance with literature data, as well as our own experience, competitive prospects of traditional PSSh, endoscopic methods and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS), in patients with portal hypertension, were defined. For patients with functional class A and B (Child-Pugh), and in the absence of liver transplantation prospects, central partial or selective PSSh, can be considered as competitive alternative.
Liver Transplantation, 2011
The role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion in managing the complications of portal hypertension is well established, but its utility in patients who have previously undergone liver transplantation is not well documented. Twentytwo orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients and 44 nontransplant patients (matched controls) who underwent TIPS were analyzed. In the OLT patients, the TIPS procedure was performed at a median of 44.8 months (range ¼ 0.3-143 months) after transplantation. Eight (36.4%) had variceal bleeding, and 14 (63.6%) had refractory ascites. The underlying liver disease was cholestatic in 10 (45.4%) and viral in 4 (18.2%). The mean pre-TIPS Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 13.4 6 5.1. There were no significant differences in age, sex, indication, etiology, or MELD score with respect to the control group. The mean initial portal pressure gradients (PPGs) were similar in the 2 groups (21.0 versus 22.4 mm Hg for the OLT patients and controls, respectively), but the final PPG was lower in the control group (9.9 versus 6.9 mm Hg, P < 0.05). The rates of both technical success and clinical success were higher in the control group versus the OLT group [95.5% versus 68.2% (P < 0.05) and 93.2% versus 77.2% (P < 0.05), respectively]. The rates of complications and post-TIPS encephalopathy were similar in the 2 groups, and there was a trend toward increased rates of shunt insufficiency in the OLT group. The mortality rate of the patients with a pre-TIPS MELD score > 15 was significantly higher in the OLT group [hazard ratio (HR) ¼ 4.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) ¼ 1.45-12.88, P < 0.05], but the mortality rates of the patients with a pre-TIPS MELD score < 15 were similar in the 2 groups. In the OLT group, the predictors of increased mortality were the pre-TIPS MELD score (HR ¼ 1.161, 95% CI ¼ 1.036-1.305, P < 0.05) and pre-TIPS MELD scores > 15 (HR ¼ 5.846, 95% CI ¼ 1.754-19.485, P < 0.05). In conclusion, TIPS insertion is feasible in transplant recipients, although its efficacy is lower in these patients versus control patients. Outcomes are poor for OLT recipients with a pre-TIPS MELD score > 15. Liver Transpl 17:771-778,
La Radiologia …, 2009
Purpose. The authors present a retrospective analysis of a large series of patients who underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement. Materials and methods. Between March 1992 and December 2006, 658 patients were referred to our centre for TIPS placement. Indications for the procedure were digestive tract bleeding (52.8%), refractory ascites (35.3%), preservation of portal vein patency prior to liver transplantation (3.0%) and thrombosis of the suprahepatic veins (2.3%). Other indications (6.6%) included pleural ascites, portal thrombosis and hepatorenal and hepatopulmonary syndromes. All patients were evaluated with colour Doppler ultrasonography and in a few cases with computed tomography. The portal system was punctured under sonographic guidance. Wallstent, Palmaz and Nitinol thermosensitive stents were used. Embolisation of persistent varices was performed in 6.8% of cases. Results. Technical success was 98.9%. During a 1,500-day follow-up, the cumulative incidence of stent revision was 25.7% (Nitinol), 32.9% (Wallstent) and 1.8% (Palmaz). Mortality rates were 31.1%, 38.5% and 56.4%, respectively. The technical complications included six cases of heart failure, six of haematobilia, three of stent migration, two of intrahepatic haematoma and one of haemoperitoneum. Eight patients with severe portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE) were treated with a reduction stent. Riassunto Obiettivo. Gli autori presentano un'analisi retrospettiva di un'ampia casistica di pazienti sottoposti a TIPS. Materiali e metodi. Sono giunti al nostro centro per la TIPS 658 pazienti tra il marzo 1992 e il dicembre 2006. Le indicazioni alla procedura erano: sanguinamento digestivo (52,8%), ascite refrattaria (35,3%), "tutela" della pervietà portale pre-trapianto epatico (3,0%), trombosi delle vene sovraepatiche (2,3%). Altre indicazioni (6,6%) erano ascite pleurica, trombosi portale, sindrome epato-renale ed epato-polmonare. I pazienti sono stati studiati con ecocolor doppler, raramente con tomografia computerizzata; la puntura portale è stata ecoguidata. Sono stati impiegati stent Palmaz, Wallstent e termoespandibili. Nel 6,8% dei casi sono state embolizzate varici persistenti. Risultati. Il successo tecnico è stato del 98,9%. Durante un follow-up di 1500 giorni, l'incidenza cumulativa di reintervento sugli stent è stata del 25,7% (Nitinol), 32,9% (Wallstent) e 1,8% (Palmaz); la mortalità è stata rispettivamente 31,1%, 38,5% e 56,4%. Le complicanze tecniche sono state: 6 insufficienze cardiache, 6 emobilie, 3 migrazioni di stent, 2 ematomi intraepatici ed 1 emoperitoneo. Otto pazienti con encefalopatia portosistemica (PSE) grave sono stati trattati con stent riduttore. Conclusioni. La TIPS è sicura ed efficace, può rappresentare un ponte all'OLT. L'ecografia ha un ruolo fondamentale nello studio preliminare, durante la puntura
Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Adult Liver Recipient With Delayed Graft Function
Transplantation Proceedings, 2005
Background. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has become an effective treatment for the complications of portal hypertension. We assessed the feasibility and outcome of TIPS in liver transplant recipients who developed delayed graft function (DGF) with portal hypertension. Methods. From June 2003 to June 2004, 80 cadaveric orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) have been performed at our institution. Five patients (6.25%) developed DGF with hyperbilirubinemia and ascites with severe portal hypertension and were treated with TIPS placement (in the 6-month time period from the transplantation). Results. There were no complications related to the procedure. No episodes of encephalopathy were seen. Four patients had better control of the ascites. In one case, we observed complete recovery of the transplanted liver with normalization of the liver function test. Three patients underwent retransplantation (within 7 days from the TIPS), whereas 1 is still on the list 6 months after TIPS placement with recurrent episodes of ascites. Conclusions. In our preliminary series, TIPS reduced dramatically the portosystemic gradient and improved clinical conditions. The results were negatively affected by the fact that the transplanted liver did not recover its function.