The EU’s strategic projection in the Indo-Pacific (original) (raw)
Related papers
The European Union and the Indo-Pacific: Exploring the Nexus
2021
On 19 April 2021, the European Union (EU) released the 'EU Strategy for Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific'. This strategy, encapsulated in a 10-page document, is the first of its kind, representing a common EU approach to the Indo-Pacific. It is a testament by the EU to the increasing geopolitical importance of the Indo-Pacific region. Following its European partners, the regional bloc is also looking to assume greater responsibility for regional and maritime security. This paper examines the new EU Strategy, the strategic convergence between the EU and India, and the prospects and challenges for EU-India relations.
Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations
The purpose of this study is to discuss the European Union’s (EU) cooperation and geo-economic approach towards the Indo-Pacific Region (IPR). This study examines the EU’s comprehensive strategy for the expansion of its presence in the Indian and the Pacific Oceans. The EU wants economic and political partnerships between the Indo-Pacific countries so as to strengthen its position in the region. The European Union’s policy has been operating in the regions as an instrument of soft power to cooperate with countries of this region. The research highlights that the EU implies the construction of structural strategic networks to intensify the high capacities in the projection of economic cooperation. As a result, the EU somehow makes a rational connection to expedite economic activities while, on the other hand, the EU needs to establish a strong mechanism to achieve ultimate geopolitical and geo-economic interest in the region.
Europecraft in the Indo-Pacific Region: Towards Pragmatic or Principled Partnership
International Studies Center , 2023
This article argues that European statecraft, or Europecraft, in the Indo-Pacific is fundamentally shaped by, and thereby juggling between, the bifurcation of contending positionalities, namely its economic partner (pragmatic power) and principled player (normative power). This article first addresses and analyses the EU’s Indo-Pacific Strategy through key concepts, namely Preferences, Priorities, Policies, and Principles. Overall, the ultimate aims of Brussels are to strengthen comprehensive partnership with like-minded regional players particularly ASEAN and to build its resilience, robustness and relevance in the Indo-Pacific region. The article concludes with the challenges and ways forward for the EU, especially under Spain’s presidency of the Council of the EU during the second half of 2023, starting in July.
The EU and European Countries' Indo-Pacific Strategies: Security and Nuclear Factor
The EU and European Countries' Indo-Pacific Strategies: Security and Nuclear Factor, 2022
The Indo-Pacific region concept, having a significant place in the U.S. as well as their Asia-Pacific allies' official discourse in the latest decades, is also penetrating the diplomatic terminology of both the EU and separate European nations. This paper features a review of how the Indo-Pacific strategies are designed as exemplified by the corresponding documents adopted by the said international organisation and some of its member states (including the former ones, such as the UK), particularly in the security realm and nuclear non-proliferation, given the importance of these factors for strategic stability in the global and regional dimensions. In terms of methodology, the article employs some elements of discourse analysis, content analysis, comparative political studies, and prognostic methods; the sources are represented by the EU and European countries' official documents, as well as speeches made by politicians. Thanks to analysing the states' strategies, main trends, which are also reflected in the common EU strategy, are singled out. The author draws a conclusion that the deterioration of the Ukrainian crisis will limit the opportunities for further development of the interregional ties between Europe and Asia.
Europe In The Indo-Pacific: Moving From Periphery To The Centre ?
2019
The rise of China and the economic ascent of Asia, more generally, are redrawing the world's geopolitical map. The emerging rivalry between China and the United States (US) has begun to transform the Indo-Pacific into a major site of strategic contestation. Despite wide disagreement on the nature, scope and motivations behind the promotion of the Indo-Pacific, the new geographic construct is beginning to gain traction. The Indo-Pacific may or may not substitute the earlier inventions like the Asia-Pacific, but it will capture some key elements of the changing regional geography and shape the regional discourse. The nature of the political, economic and security architecture for the region will continue to animate the US, China, Japan, India and other regional actors. Europe, it has been widely assumed, will have no interest in the Indo-Pacific. That presumption is rooted in two important trends. In post-colonial Asia, there was inevitable diminution of Europe's historic political weight in the region as the US took up the burden of securing the region. Since the end of the Cold War, Europe has been preoccupied with the reshaping of its own structures of integration and had little time for Asian geopolitics.
New European Strategy for the Indo-Pacific Region, 2022
The main consequence of rapidly progressing globalization is the strengthening of new, dynamically developing economies. The paper includes the author’s reflections on the European Union’s strategy for the Indo-Pacific region, which is responsible for 60% of global GDP and 2/3 of global economic growth. As a result, this makes that neighborhood an area of conflicting interests and rivalry between the economically strongest state entities. Despite the relatively late involvement of other foreign players in the region, the European Union is also trying to strengthen its position in this area. On September 16, 2021, the “EU Cooperation Strategy in the Indo-Pacific Region” was established. The author of the paper will try to answer two main research questions: (1) What influences the shape of the European strategy towards the Indo-Pacific region? and (2) What obstacles does the European Union face in the process of shaping its relations with representatives of this region? NOWA EUROPEJSKA STRATEGIA WOBEC REGIONU INDO-PACYFIKU Główną konsekwencją szybko postępującej globalizacji jest umacnianie się nowych, dynamicznie rozwijających się gospodarek. Artykuł zawiera rozważania autorki na temat strategii Unii Europejskiej wobec regionu Indo-Pacyfiku, który odpowiada za 60% globalnego PKB i 2/3 światowego wzrostu gospodarczego. W efekcie obszar ten staje się areną sprzecznych interesów i rywalizacji pomiędzy najsilniejszymi gospodarczo podmiotami państwowymi. Mimo stosunkowo późnego zaangażowania się pozostałych zagranicznych graczy w regionie Unia Europejska również stara się umocnić swoją pozycję na tym terenie. 16 września 2021 roku została opublikowana „Unijna strategia współpracy w regionie Indo-Pacyfiku”. Autorka artykułu spróbuje odpowiedzieć na dwa główne pytania badawcze: (1) Co wpływa na kształt europejskiej strategii wobec regionu Indo-Pacyfiku? oraz (2) Jakie przeszkody napotyka Unia Europejska w procesie kształtowania relacji z przedstawicielami tego regionu?
Engaging The Indo-Pacific: Some Pointers For Europe
The regional dynamics of the Indo-Pacific Region (IPR), particularly maritime security-related, are distinctly different from other regions, especially Europe. There are existential sub-regional dynamics that vary across the IPR, which need to be viewed through an Indo-Pacific lens and not a European or NATO lens. This issue brief argues that while the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict may temporarily impact European maritime security interactions in the Indo-Pacific, there is a parallel need to enhance capacity and capability and organizational interactions to shape the European approach to the IPR and enhance its maritime footprint in line with the common aim of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific.
The European Union (EU) is deepening its political and security engagement in the so-called Indo-Pacific mega-region. Aside from alluring economic drivers, this article argues that growing suspicion vis-à-vis the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has been accompanied by a multilayered set of ententes with “like-minded” Asia-Pacific partners, starting with the United States of America (US), all the way to Japan, South Korea, and Australia. This effort has been facilitated and hastened by US policy under the Biden administration and Russia’s war in Ukraine. On the basis of first-hand elite interviews over the course of many years of fieldwork, as well as documentary evidence, including those in the Japanese language, the article argues that the EU and major member states have recalibrated earlier aspirations for effective multilateralism and strategic autonomy to more forcefully align with a concert of Indo-Pacific counterparts, led by the United States. The case of the EU-Japan strategic partnership is indicative of such trends, as it covers traditional and non-traditional security domains.
European Journal of International Security, 2024
In the last two decades, the European Union (EU) has forged an international role as a 'force for good' and a champion for democracy, human rights, multilateralism, free trade, climate change action, and sustainable development. However, as the international context has grown more competitive and turbulent, it has become more challenging for the EU to uphold this global role. Subsequently, the EU has pursued more proactive policies to confront urgent challenges to the rules-based international system and global governance norms. This paper explores what the EU's evolving geopolitical foreign policy role actually entails and how it is compatible with the Union's understanding of itself as a global leader as expressed as a Normative Power, Market Power, and Security Power. Utilising the Indo-Pacific Strategy of 2021 and subsequent communications as illustrative examples, it examines how the EU is upscaling its plans and partnerships into a broader, sustainable connectivity strategy that fits into the context of a reoriented EU foreign policy and its leadership goals. In conclusion, it finds that the credibility of the three powers that the EU proclaims to play will be dependent on the coherence of the role set and the extent to which the EU can achieve these roles.