Reinventing a Square Wheel: Critique of a Resurgent "Protection Paradigm" in International Biodiversity Conservation (original) (raw)
Related papers
CHAPTER 3 Biodiversity conservation and management
2014
Corinne Maréchal1, Valérie Cawoy2, Christine Cocquyt3, Gilles Dauby2, Steven Dessein3, Iain Douglas-Hamilton4,5, Jef Dupain6, Eberhard Fischer7, Danielle Fouth Obang8, Quentin Groom3, Philipp Henschel9, Kathryn J. Jeffery10,11, Lisa Korte12, Simon L. Lewis13, Sébastien Luhunu14, Fiona Maisels11,15, Mario Melletti16, Roger Ngoufo17, Salvatore Ntore2, Florence Palla18, Paul Scholte8, Bonaventure Sonké15, Tariq Stevart3, Piet Stoffelen3, Dries Van den Broeck3, Gretchen Walters14, Elisabeth A. Williamson11
Forests
Human well-being and the prerequisite sustainable environmental management are currently at stake, reaching a bottleneck when trying to cope with (i) the ever-growing world population, (ii) the constantly increasing need for natural resources (and the subsequent overexploitation of species, habitats, ecosystems, and landscapes) and (iii) the documented and on-going impacts of climate change. In developed societies, the concern about environmental protection is set high in the public dialogue, as well as to management and policy agendas. The recently constituted Intergovernmental Science—Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) urges transformative changes for technological, economic, and social factors aiming to tackle both direct and indirect drivers of biodiversity loss. By this, the role of conservation and management practices for the environment is characterized as a crucial and top issue and should deal with (a) promoting best practices from the local to ...
Safeguarding biodiversity: What works according to the conservation community
Dramatic increases in human populations and per capita consumption, climate change, overexploitation of marine and freshwater resources, and deforestation have caused a litany of negative consequences for biodiversity. Such doom-and-gloom scenarios are widely known, frequently cited and frankly depressing. Although accurate assessments of threats have clear value for intervention planning, we believe there is also a need to reflect on successes. Such reflection provides balance to negative scenarios and may shift attention towards constructive, positive action. Here we use a systematic evaluation of success stories provided by conservation scientists and practitioners to explore the characteristics of the projects perceived as being associated with success. Success was deemed to have occurred for .% of the projects simply because an event had occurred (e.g. a law was passed) and for .% of projects quantitative data indicated success (e.g. censuses demonstrated population increase). However, for most projects (.%) there was no evaluation and success was defined by the subjective opinion of the respondent. Conservation community members viewed successful projects most often as those being long-term (%), small in spatial scale (%), with a relatively low budget (%), and involving a protectionist approach alone or in combination with another approach. These results highlight the subjectivity of definitions of success in conservation but also the characteristics of conservation efforts that the conservation community perceives as indicative of success.