The Influence of Indenter Rotation Angle on The Quality of Vicker Tester Calibration (original) (raw)
Related papers
Measuring Equipment Calibration and Determination of the Initial Calibration Interval
2020
To optimize measurement procedures in laboratories, in terms of the balance between economics and risk, determination of the optimal calibration interval for measuring equipment has significant importance. This paper will show an approximate, but effective method for determination of initial calibration interval, regarding “ILAC” guidelines and original recommendations based on authors’ experience. The presented applied method is adapted for the equipment used in a laboratory for building materials and structural testing, and the results of its application are shown on the examples of several different instruments. Impact factors on calibration intervals are analyzed, and the basic recommendations for revision of the initial calibration intervals are given.
A careful consideration of the calibration concept
Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2001
This paper presents a detailed discussion of the technical aspects of the calibration process with emphasis on the definition of the measurand, the conditions under which the calibration results are valid, and the subsequent use of the calibration results in measurement uncertainty statements. The concepts of measurement uncertainty, error, systematic error, and reproducibility are also addressed as they pertain to the calibration process.
Calibration of measudng and test equipment is lhe fundamental requirement for testing ancl measurements and thereby quality of manufacturing anSl seruices. Although, calibration was in vogue fur some fonn or other for centuries, the releaso of ISO 9000 Standards for quality system in the year 1987 has given a new impetus for,the calibration activity as a whole. It is now well understood that calibration is an important requirement to be fulfilled for qualify in every organization. Clause 4.11 in ISO 9000 Standards on oalibration is one of the longest and toughest requirements amongst the 20 elements in the standard. Ih order to give additional'guidance, ISO has also brought out standard ISO 10012-1. : L992 entitled "Quality Assurance Requirernents for Measuring Equipment" wldch is now accepted all over the world. ISO 10012.1 has stipulated the quality assul'ance requilements and guidance not only for the measuring equipment but 1 'also for the calib'ration system. The calibration system comprises of all asfects suolt as plaruring and silection of equiprnenl calibration procedures, lecords, labeling calibration intervals and traceability. Traceabitify of measurements alone cannot ensure quality of calibrations. This has also been amply made clear by ISO/IBC Guide 25 entitled 'lGeneral.criteria for operation of testing laboratories" which is the guidfurg document for
Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration
PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to harmonise evaluation of uncertainty of measurement within EA, to set up, in addition to the general requirements of EAL-R1, the specific demands in reporting uncertainty of measurement on calibration certificates issued by accredited laboratories and to assist accreditation bodies with a coherent assignment of best measurement capability to calibration laboratories accredited by them. As the rules laid down in this document are in compliance with the recommendations of the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, published by seven international organisations concerned with standardisation and metrology, the implementation of EA-4/02 will also foster the global acceptance of European results of measurement.
Measurement Science Review
We address the problem of linear comparative calibration, a special case of linear calibration where both variables are measured with errors, and the analysis of the uncertainty of the measurement results obtained with the calibrated instrument. The concept is explained in detail using the calibration experiment of the pressure transducer and the subsequent analysis of the measurement uncertainties. In this context, the calibration and the measurements with the calibrated instrument are performed according to ISO Technical Specification 28037:2010 (here referred to as ISO linear calibration), based on the approximate linear calibration model and the application of the law of propagation of uncertainty (LPU) in this approximate model. Alternatively, estimates of the calibration line parameters, their standard uncertainties, the coverage intervals and the associated probability distributions are obtained using the Monte Carlo method (MCM) based on the law of propagation of distributio...
Determining Measurement Uncertainty Parameters for Calibration Processes
The paper explains the concept of measurement uncertainty attributed to the calibration of measuring and testing instruments used for various industrial functions. All the steps to calculate measurement uncertainty during calibration are described in a way which is easy to understand. It also helps to develop reliable and standardized uncertainty estimates which in turn will provide assurance to the calibration process and reduce disagreements and confusion in scientific findings pertaining to quality of the result. The structured, step-bystep uncertainty analysis for calibration scenarios of instruments such as Micrometer and Pressure Gauge described herein will assist to address the important aspects of identifying measurement process uncertainties and using appropriate uncertainty estimates/models (in accordance with Guide to Uncertainty Measurement – GUM). This will also help to take valid managerial decisions by the measurement quality assurance team.