Virtual consultation for actinic keratosis (original) (raw)

Actinic Keratosis: Rationale and Management

Dermatology and Therapy, 2014

Actinic keratoses (AKs) are common skin lesions heralding an increased risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and other skin malignancies, arising principally due to excessive ultraviolet (UV) exposure. They are predominantly found in fair-skinned individuals, and increasingly, are a problem of the immunosuppressed. AKs may regress spontaneously, remain stable or transform to invasive SCC. The risk of SCC increases for those with more than 5 AKs, and the majority of SCCs arise from AKs. The main mechanisms of AK formation are inflammation, oxidative stress, immunosuppression, impaired apoptosis, mutagenesis, dysregulation of cell growth and proliferation, and tissue remodeling. Human papilloma virus has also been implicated in the formation of some AKs. Understanding these mechanisms guides the rationale behind the current available treatments for AKs. One of the main principles underpinning the management of AKs is that of field cancerization. Wide areas of skin are exposed to increasing amounts of UV light and other environmental insults as we age. This is especially true for the head, neck and forearms. These insults do not target only the skin where individual lesions develop, but also large areas where crops of AKs may appear. The skin between lesions is exposed to the same insults and is likely to contain as-yet undetectable preclinical lesions or areas of dysplastic cells. The whole affected area is known as the 'field'. Management is therefore divided into lesion-directed and field-directed therapies. Current therapies include lesiondirected cryotherapy and/or excision, and topical field-directed creams: 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, diclofenac, photodynamic therapy and ingenol mebutate. Combining lesion-and field-directed therapies has yielded good results Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (and several novel therapies are under investigation. Treatment is variable and tailored to the individual making a gold standard management algorithm difficult to design. This literature review article aims to describe the rationale behind the best available therapies for AKs in light of current understanding of pathophysiology and epidemiology. A PubMed and MEDLINE search of literature was performed between

Advances and Considerations in the Management of Actinic Keratosis: An Expert Consensus Panel Report

Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, 2021

Background: Actinic keratosis (AK) is a potentially pre-malignant tumor with a poorly defined risk of progression to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Because of the typical need for recurrent cycles of AK treatment, outcomes can be limited by both therapeutic efficacy and patient adherence. Objective: To synthesize the available and most current literature into overarching principles to provide guidance on the management of AKs, improving patient experiences and treatment outcomes. Methods: A systematic review querying epidemiology, natural history, prognosis, management of AKs as well as the mechanism of action of and adherence to current AK therapy was conducted. After reviewing the literature, an expert consensus panel consisting of 10 expert dermatologists and dermatopathologists used a modified Delphi process to develop statements regarding the pathogenesis and management of AKs. Final statements were only adopted with a supermajority vote (≥7/10). Results: The panel developed 7 consensus statements regarding AKs pathogenesis and management. Conclusion: The poorly defined risk for AK progression into invasive SCC without universally accepted clinical-histopathological factors highlights the importance of long-term efficacious treatment. To effectively counsel and treat patients with actinic keratoses, dermatologists must understand how newer therapeutic approaches with mechanisms of action that have more rapid onset of action, shorter treatment courses, and less intense local skin reaction (LSRs) may promote adherence and improve long-term outcomes.

The importance of treating the field in actinic keratosis

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2017

Actinic keratoses (AKs) are intraepithelial atypical proliferations of keratinocytes that develop in skin that has undergone long-term exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Given the ageing population and an increasing prevalence of AK, the socioeconomic burden of AK is likely to rise over the coming years. Areas of subclinical (non-visible) sun damage in the periphery of visible AK lesions contain the same genetic changes as those found in the lesions themselves, and are known as areas of field cancerization. AK lesions and the field are associated with an increased risk of skin cancer, including invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Although effective in clearing visible AK, lesion-directed therapies do not address field cancerization and can lead to high recurrence rates. In contrast, field-directed therapies, such as ingenol mebutate, imiquimod and diclofenac, can clear both visible and subclinical AK lesions and reduce the development of new lesions in the treated field. Additionally, preclinical studies suggest that field therapy may prevent or delay the recurrence of non-melanoma skin cancer. AK treatment guidelines now recognize the importance of treating the field in patients with AK, and adaptation of treatment guidelines into clinical practice is warranted. Physician and patient education around the consequences of leaving the field of cancerization untreated is necessary in order to reduce the increasing burden associated with AK.

Actinic keratosis - review for clinical practice

International journal of dermatology, 2018

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a lesion that arises as a result of excessive exposure to solar radiation and appearing predominantly on Fitzpatrick phototype I and II skin. Given that some AKs evolve into squamous cell carcinoma, these lesions are considered premalignant in nature, occurring mostly in elderly men and immunosuppressed individuals chronically exposed to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. There are several mechanisms for the formation of AKs; among them are oxidative stress, immunosuppression, inflammation, altered proliferation and dysregulation of cell growth, impaired apoptosis, mutagenesis, and human papillomavirus (HPV). Through the understanding of these mechanisms, several treatments have emerged. Among the options for AK treatment, the most commonly used include 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cryotherapy, diclofenac, photodynamic therapy (PDT), imiquimod (IQ), retinoids, and ingenol mebutate (IM). There have been recent advances in the treatment options that have seen the emergent...

A GP’s guide to actinic keratosis

2016

ctinic keratoses (AKs) are superficial, discrete, erythematous and scaly skin lesions. They are also known as solar keratoses or ‘sunspots’. AKs are found predominantly on sun-exposed areas such as the scalp, face and forearms.1 Globally, Australians have the highest rate of AK development, resulting in a prevalence of 40 to 60% among the Caucasian population above the age of 40 years.1,2 Not surprisingly, the treatment of AK often falls under the responsibility of GPs so it is important to be aware of the full range of available treatment options.

Physician perceptions and experience of current treatment in actinic keratosis

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2014

Background Topical therapy is important in the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK), a major risk factor for, and early development stage of, squamous cell carcinoma. Despite this, research addressing the limitations and challenges associated with topical field therapy in actinic keratosis is lacking.

Italian expert consensus paper on the management of patients with actinic keratoses

Two round tables involving experts were organized in order to reach a consensus on the management of patients with actinic keratosis (AK). In the first, seven clinical questions were selected and analyzed by a systematic literature review, using a Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes framework; in the second, the experts discussed relevant evidences and a consensus statement for each question was developed. Consensus was reached among experts on how to best treat AK patients with respect to different clinical scenarios and special populations. Lesion-directed treatments are preferred in patients with few AKs. Patients with multiple AKs are challenging, with more than one treatment usually needed to achieve complete lesion clearance or a high lesion response rate, therapy should be personalized, based on previous treatments, patient, and lesion characteristics. Methyl aminolevulinate-PDT, DL (day light) PDT, and imiquimod cream were demonstrated to have the lowest percentage of new AKs after post treatment follow-up. For IMQ 5% and 3.75%, a higher intensity of skin reactions is associated with higher efficacy. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is the most studied treatment for AKs on the arms. Regular sunscreen use helps preventing new AKs. Oral nicotinamide 500 mg twice daily, systemic retinoids and regular sunscreen use were demonstrated to reduce the number of new squamous cell carcinomas in patients with AKs. Limited evidence is available for the treatment of AKs in organ transplant recipients. There is no evidence in favor or against the use of any of the available treatments in patients suffering from hematological cancer. K E Y W O R D S 0.5% 5-FU (fluoro uracil)-salicylic acid, actinic keratosis, ALA and MAL PDT, cancerization field, imiquimod cream (3.75% and 5%), ingenol mebutate gel, nicotinamide, organ transplant recipients, systemic retinoids, topical treatment

Randomized Trial of Four Treatment Approaches for Actinic Keratosis

New England Journal of Medicine

BACKGROUND Actinic keratosis is the most frequent premalignant skin disease in the white population. In current guidelines, no clear recommendations are made about which treatment is preferred. METHODS We investigated the effectiveness of four frequently used field-directed treatments (for multiple lesions in a continuous area). Patients with a clinical diagnosis of five or more actinic keratosis lesions on the head, involving one continuous area of 25 to 100 cm 2 , were enrolled at four Dutch hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 5% fluorouracil cream, 5% imiquimod cream, methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT), or 0.015% ingenol mebutate gel. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a reduction of 75% or more in the number of actinic keratosis lesions from baseline to 12 months after the end of treatment. Both a modified intention-to-treat analysis and a perprotocol analysis were performed. RESULTS A total of 624 patients were included from November 2014 through March 2017. At 12 months after the end of treatment, the cumulative probability of remaining free from treatment failure was significantly higher among patients who received fluorouracil (74.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 66.8 to 81.0) than among those who received imiquimod (53.9%; 95% CI, 45.4 to 61.6), MAL-PDT (37.7%; 95% CI, 30.0 to 45.3), or ingenol mebutate (28.9%; 95% CI, 21.8 to 36.3). As compared with fluorouracil, the hazard ratio for treatment failure was 2.03 (95% CI, 1.36 to 3.04) with imiquimod, 2.73 (95% CI, 1.87 to 3.99) with MAL-PDT, and 3.33 (95% CI, 2.29 to 4.85) with ingenol mebutate (P≤0.001 for all comparisons). No unexpected toxic effects were documented. CONCLUSIONS At 12 months after the end of treatment in patients with multiple actinic keratosis lesions on the head, 5% fluorouracil cream was the most effective of four fielddirected treatments.

Management of Actinic Keratoses

Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports, 2021

While there are many treatment options for AKs their efficacy is variable (Table 1). Treatment options range from targeted in office procedures such as cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen to topical therapies that are applied by the patient. Additionally, each therapy, not surprisingly, has its own unintended side effects ranging from a stinging sensation on the skin to therapy induced fevers. When choosing an appropriate therapy for each patient some considerations include skin type, disease burden and patient reliability.

Current therapies for actinic keratosis

International Journal of Dermatology, 2020

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a very common skin disease caused by chronic sun damage, which in 75% of cases arises on chronically sun-exposed areas, such as face, scalp, neck, hands, and forearms. AKs must be considered an early squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) for their probable progression into invasive SCC. For this reason, all AK should be treated, and clinical follow-up is recommended. The aims of treatment are: (i) to clinically eradicate evident and subclinical lesions, (ii) to prevent their evolution into SCC, and (iii) to reduce the number of relapses. Among available treatments, it is possible to distinguish lesiondirected therapies and field-directed therapies. Lesion-directed treatments include: (i) cryotherapy; (ii) laser therapy; (iii) surgery; and (iv) curettage. Whereas, field-directed treatments are: (i) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); (ii) diclofenac 3% gel; (iii) chemical peeling; (iv) imiquimod; and (v) photodynamic therapy (PDT). Prevention plays an important role in the treatment of AKs, and it is based on the continuous use of sunscreen and protective clothing. This review shows different types of available treatments and describes the characteristics and benefits of each medication, underlining the best choice.