Challenges to the lake fisheries, and factors affecting the effectiveness of a co-management regime in African Great Lakes: A case study of Lake Victoria, Kenya (original) (raw)

Abstract

There is a common agreement that establishment of co-management could be of benefit to fisher community and other stakeholders across the African Great Lakes. This could aid in promoting community livelihoods and sustainability of the fishery and lakes ecosystem. However, the effectiveness of established co-management regimes remains unknown. This study evaluated the effectiveness of established comanagement units, specifically Beach Management Units, along Lake Victoria, Kenya. Data was collected through site observations, and questionnaire led interviews involving the key informants and Beach Management Units' members. The study depicted presence of illegal gears (5.7%), pollution (10.2%), insecurity (3.4%) and targeting of undersized fish (1.1%) among others. The role of the management units in lessening aforesaid challenges was reported overall to be below 36%. Features donating to overall performance, enforcement, conflict resolution, welfare and awareness creation, were rated at 17.6%, 33.8%, 35.5% and 13.2% correspondingly. The low rating of such measurable attributes advocates lack of effectiveness of co-management in Lake Victoria, Kenya. Albeit key registers and records were known to most of the members, there were no signs of progressive growth in the management units. This was attributed mainly to lack of continuous awareness creation amid the changing lake environmental conditions and dynamics in the specific species fishery. There is need to sustain the achievements so far attained in promoting co-management and ecosystem sustainability, as enforcement of laws and regulations can be a challenging undertaking without government support. Governments should ensure financial and material provision in expanding capacity of co-management units in promoting community livelihoods and fishery sustainability.

Figures (6)

Key takeaways

sparkles

AI

  1. BMUs in Lake Victoria exhibit low effectiveness, with overall performance rated below 36%.
  2. Illegal fishing practices persist, with 5.7% using illegal gears and 1.1% targeting undersized fish.
  3. Only 17.6% of BMUs' roles focused on enforcement, highlighting major weaknesses in fisheries management.
  4. Government support is essential for financial and material resources to enhance BMUs' capacity.
  5. The text evaluates the co-management regime's effectiveness in Lake Victoria's fisheries for community sustainability.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (18)

  1. Abila, R.O., 2014. Impacts of international fish trade: a case study of Lake Victoria fisheries. Available on http://www. researchgate.net/publication/261133576. March 27 2014.
  2. Aura1, M.C., Nyamweya, S.c., Njiru, M.J., Odoli, C., Musa, S., Ogari, Z., Abila, R., Okeyo, R., Oketch, R., 2019. Using fish landing sites and markets information towards quantification of the blue economy to enhance fisheries management. Fish Manag Ecol. 26:141-152
  3. Berkes, F., Mahon, R., McConney, R., Pollnac, R. and Pomeroy, R., 2001. Managing Small-scale Fisheries. Alternative Directions and Methods. IDRC, Canada.
  4. Cochrane, L.K., Garcia, M.S., 2009. Introduction -Fisheries Management. In: K. L. Cochrane, M.S. Garcia (Eds.),, A fishery manager's guidebook (second edition), pp. 1-17. FAO and Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, West Sussex, United Kingdom\ Fisheries Bulletin, 2016. Fisheries Annual Statistical Bulletin. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, State Department of Fisheries and the Blue Economy, Nairobi, Kenya.
  5. Imende, S., Hoza, R., Bakunda, A., 2005. The status, development and role of Beach Management Units (BMUs) in the management of the fishery resource. In: LVFO 2005: The state of the fisheries resources of Lake Victoria and their management. Proceedings of the Regional stakeholders' conferences, Entebbe Uganda, ISBN 9970-713-10-2.
  6. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS), 2016. Kenya Demographic and Health Survey LVFO, 2008. Report of the lake-wide acoustic survey; Implementation of a fisheries management plan report, pp. 80. Lake Victoria Fisheries Organisation, Jinja, Uganda.
  7. LVFO, 2014. Final regional CAS synthesis report. CAS regional working group members, LVFO Secretariat, Jinja Uganda.
  8. Mboya, D.O., Kristofersson, D., Okwach, R.A., 2016. Economic valuation of illegal fishing: An empirical study of beach seine ban enforcement in Lake Victoria, Kenya. Afric. J. Trop. Hydr. Fis. 14(1), 51 -65.
  9. Mulatu, D.W., vanOel, P.R., Odongo, V., Van der Veen, A. 2018. Fishing community preferences and willingness to pay for alternative developments of ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) for Lake Naivasha, Kenya. Lake & Reserv: Sci, Pol and Manag for Sust Use. 3, 190-203. doi. org/10.1111/lre.12225.
  10. Nyeko, D., Gitonga, N., Nanyaro, F., 2005. Current and future challenges and opportunities to sustainability of the fisheries resources. In: LVFO 2005: The state of the fisheries resources of Lake Victoria and their management. Proceedings of the Regional stakeholders conference, 2005 February 24-25, Entebbe Uganda, ISBN 9970-713-10-2.
  11. Obiero, K. O., Abila, R.O., Njiru, M.J., Raburu, P.O., Achieng, A.O., Kundu, R., Ogello, E. O., Munguti, J.M., Lawrence, T., 2015. The challenges of management: Recent experiences in implementing fisheries co-management in Lake Victoria, Kenya. Lakes & Reserv.: Res. Man. 20(3), 139 -154.
  12. Odongkara, K., Abila, R., Onyango, P., 2005. Socio-economic viability and sustainability of BMUs: Case study of the cross-border BMUs on Lake Victoria. Available on http:// www.researchgate.net/publication/261133576\. .
  13. Ogello, E. O., Obiero, K. Munguti, J. M., 2013. Lake Victoria and the common property debate: Is the tragedy of the commons a threat to its future. Lakes, Reserv. and Ponds. 7(2), 101 -126.
  14. Okedi, J. O., 2005. A historical perspective of the challenges and opportunities in management of the Lake Victoria fisheries: Lessons for the future. In: LVFO 2005: The state of the fisheries resources of Lake Victoria and their management. Proceedings of the Regional stakeholders conferences, 2005 February 24-25, Entebbe Uganda, ISBN 9970-713- 10-2.
  15. Omwenga, R. N., 2006. Community involvement in fish harvesting around Lake Victoria (Kenya) p (245 -251). http://www.oceandocs.org/bitstream/handle/1834/2778/ WLCK-245-251.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed on 16 th may 2017.
  16. Kashindye, B.B., Valtýsson, H., Jónsson, S., 2016. Assessment of Dagaa (Rastrineobola argentea) stock and effects of environment in Lake Victoria, East Africa. United Nations University -Fisheries Training Program (UNU-FTP), Reykjavik, Iceland
  17. Kolding, J.., van Zwieten, P., Marttin, F., Poulain, F., 2016. Fisheries in the drylands of sub-saharan Africa "Fish ome with rains". FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1118.
  18. Taabu-Munyaho, A., Nyamweya, C., Sitoki, L., Kayanda, R.J., Eversons, I., Marteinsdóttir, G., 2014. Spatial and temporal variation in the distribution and density of pelagic fish species in Lake Victoria, (East Africa). Aquatic Ecosystem Health Management. 17(1), 52-61.