Determinants of consumer acceptance of genetically modified and gene-edited foods: Market and policy implications (original) (raw)
Related papers
Role of product benefits and potential risks in consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods
2005
This study examines the role of product benefits and potential risks in consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) foods. The study analyzes consumer willingness to consume three meat products that confer specific benefits with an inherent risk. Results indicate that respondents who were provided both the product benefit and risk information were less likely to consume the three GM food products than those who were only provided the product benefit information. Results also suggest that males are consistently more likely to consume the three GM products than females. Those who take the time to read food labels were also consistently less likely to consume the three products considered in this study. Differences in social or political values (i.e., conservative or liberal) and trust in private and public entities were not significant factors affecting consumers' willingness to accept GM foods.
CABI Agriculture and Bioscience, 2021
Background This study statistically explores the relationship between information provision and peoples’ attitudes towards the application of gene-editing technology to food, by contrasting cases of gene-edited livestock and vegetables in Japan. Japanese food producers and researchers are optimistic about the application of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) approach to food. Due to the strict regulations regarding genetically modified (GM) food, GM crops are not commercially cultivated in Japan. Consumers worldwide have concerns about application of this technology to food. Further examination of this issue for Japanese consumers with lower acceptance towards GM food should provide essential information for global agricultural communities. Methods Using a web survey, split-ballot experimental design was used to randomly assign the respondents into two groups: (1) the animal group, for which information on breeding technologies, including gene edi...
Food Policy, 2008
An increasing set of evidence has been reported on how consumers could potentially react to the introduction of genetically modified food. Studies typically contain some empirical evidence and some theoretical explanations of the data, however, to date limited effort has been posed on systematically reviewing the existing evidence and its implications for policy. This paper contributes to the literature by bringing together the published evidence on the behavioural frameworks and evidence on the process leading to the public acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food and organisms (GMOs). In doing so, we employ a set of clearly defined search tools and a limited number of comprehensive key words. The study attempts to gather an understanding of the published findings on the determinants of the valuation of GM food-both in terms of willingness to accept and the willing-to-pay a premium for non-GM food, trust with information sources on the safety and public health and ultimate attitudes underpinning such evidence. Furthermore, in the light of such evidence, we formulate some policy strategies to deal with public uncertainly regarding to GMOs and, especially GM food.
Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 2000
During roughly the last century, large increases in real per capita income have occurred in the currently highincome countries. R&D has been the source of improvements in existing goods and the introduction of new goods. Only recently has the full importance of successful new goods to economic growth been discovered. Not all seemingly useful new goods, however, have been adopted. For example, genetically modified (GM) foods have been engulfed in considerable controversy, and the early optimism has been dampened. Information issues-labeling and asymmetric information-are central to the GM-food debate. Furthermore, it is important to understand the reaction in developed countries to GM-foods because they set the tone of the world market in grains, oilseeds, and animal products.
Consumer perceptions of genetically modified food
2003
Phone surveys were conducted with 1200 American adults in 2001 and in 2003 designed to track the strength, extent and persistence of consumers' attitudes toward genetically modified food. The results suggest that most Americans remain largely uninformed about GM foods and the topic is not often the subject of social discourse. Only 20% of Americans report having had more than one or two conversations about genetically modified foods. However, the results also suggest that support for GM foods has slipped between 2001 and 2003. In 2001, 59% of Americans said they thought GM would make their lives better. Only 39% had a similar response in 2003.
The effects of prior beliefs and learning on consumers’ acceptance of genetically modified foods
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2007
New food products using genetically modified crops appeared in U.S. supermarkets starting in 1996, and consumers' perceived some risks. This paper examines the role of consumers prior beliefs about genetic modification and of diverse, new information on their willingness to pay for foods that might be genetically modified. We use data from economics experiments and show that participants who had informed prior beliefs discounted GM-labeled food products more highly than those who had uninformed prior beliefs. Uninformed participants were especially susceptible to information from interested and third parties. In contrast, informed participants were generally not affected significantly by new information. Received only pro-biotechnology GM-information vs. received pro-biotechnology and anti-biotechnology GM-information t = 0.20, p = 0.84 t = −0.04, p = 0.97 t = −1.96, p = 0.06 Received only anti-biotechnology GM-information vs. received pro-biotechnology and anti-biotechnology GM-information t = 2.03, p = 0.05 t = 2.68, p = 0.01 t = 2.26, p = 0.03 (B) Participants who had informed prior beliefs about genetic modification Received only pro-biotechnology GM-information vs. received only anti-biotechnology GM-information t = 1.78, p = 0.09 t = 1.76, p = 0.09 t = 1.72, p = 0.10 Received only pro-biotechnology GM-information vs. received pro-biotechnology and anti-biotechnology GM-information t = −1.76, p = 0.09 t = −0.96, p = 0.35 t = −1.45, p = 0.16
Food Policy Institute
This report presents the results from the second phase of a longitudinal study of Americans' knowledge and feelings about agricultural biotechnology and how those perceptions and attitudes have changed over time. Two independent national probability samples of 1,200 adults were interviewed by phone in the spring of 2001 and 2003. While this report focuses on the findings from 2003, longitudinal comparisons are presented where appropriate.