Cussó, Roser & Piguet, Laure “Statistics and Quantification” (original) (raw)
Related papers
Fanny Badache, Leah R. Kimber, Lucile Martens (ed), International Organizations and Research Methods. An Introduction, 2023
Quantified information is one among the many daily productions of IOs. From trade statistics to unemployment rates, these institutions make avail- able to a “world community of users” data on almost every aspect of the social and physical world. How can a researcher approach these statistics? What are the particularities of studying data produced by IOs as compared to the study of other IO productions, or of national statistics? What does this research tell us about the functioning of IOs and, more broadly, about statistical expertise as an instrument of power and influence? The sociology of quantification offers useful methodological guidelines for the researcher who aims at opening the “black box” of the statistical production of IOs.
The 16th International Conference of the Brazilian Studies Association (BRASA, March 9-12, 2022), 2022
This panel departs from a shared understanding of the centrality and significance of quantified information in politics, economics, public policy, and civil rights in contemporary Brazil. It brings together scholars working in a variety of disciplinary fields-from sociology to anthropology to history-whose research interrogates the role of numbers, indexers, charts, statistical methods, biometric databases, survey questionnaires, and a multiplicity of other tools of enumeration not only as conduits of governmental legibility and biopolitical rationality but also as infrastructure and situated practice. We are particularly keen to understand how qualified, standardized, and stylized data function as the material bedrock for more-than-human statistical, economic, and political information systems-from Brazil's national population census to urban infrastructure extraction in Rio de Janeiro to genetic material collection in forensic science. Conversely, our approach foregrounds the contingent, arbitrary, and pragmatic nature of these mechanisms of creating, converting, and circulating informational value, as well as their institutional obduracy and cultural embeddedness-from the sustained networks of transnational academic exchange that gravitated around the expansion of microeconometric models to the modelization of estimates of political responsibility for Covid-19-related deaths. Through this conceptual arsenal, our panel highlights quantification as an unfinished and ongoing process involving materiality and intention, rationality and affect, classification and identity-making, representation and imagination.
Regimes of Digital Quantification: making data-driven decisions?
DRS2018: Catalyst, 2018
In light of the proliferation of sensors, data and analytics, multiple digital quantification regimes are emerging under promises of a revolutionary change in the way in which decisions are made in areas such as urban planning and government. These regimes present a growing need to differentiate themselves in order to capitalize their data, deploying particular technologies that go beyond the digital. In this paper, we review two digital quantification regimes of urban cycling in Santiago, Chile: the RUBI device and KAPPO smartphone application. Through the study of the design of material and narrative technologies of these regimes, we will show how they try to distinguish their modes of quantifying the cyclists' mobility, configuring particular versions of target users, the city and its forms of government, in order to promote an urban planning driven by data.
Statistical Journal of the IAOS
The growing importance of statistical evidence, data and information for political decisions is reflected in the handy and popular formulation 'Data for Policy' (D4P). Under this cover, well-known guiding themes, such as the modernisation of the public sector, or evidence-informed policy-making, are led to new solutions with new technologies and infinitely rich data sources. Data for Policy means more to official statistics than just new data, techniques and methods. It is not least a matter of securing an important function and position for official statistics in the Policy for Data of the future. In order to justify this position, it is necessary to have a clear understanding of the tasks of official statistics for the functioning of (democratic) societies, with a view to how these tasks have to be reinterpreted under changing conditions (above all because of digitisation and globalisation).
This thesis is concerned with the contemporary history of quantitative surveys in Sweden. The core epistemic practice of constructing surveys is examined empirically through a case study of the SOM Institute (Samhälle, Opinion, Medier) at University of Gothenburg. The SOM Institute has performed surveys in Sweden since 1986. However, the methodology of quantitative surveys with representative sampling techniques dates back to the 1940s. A central theme in this theses is to follow how these methods and techniques have been made to work under different historical circumstances.
What Numbers Do? Production, Uses, and Effects of Quantification in Everyday Life
Mediações - Revista de Ciências Sociais, 2021
The Covid-19 pandemic outbreak engendered an intense circulation of tables, graphics, statistics and rankings that seek to narrate the infection`s behavior and deaths. Such "data" became the object of disputes and negotiations, highlighting the centrality and political effects of numerical narratives. For a long time, researchers have been approaching processes of measuring populations and social phenomena as instruments of power and, more recently, they have advanced in the discussion on the political effects of reducing complex social processes to numbers. In this introduction, we outline issues that populate contemporary debates on quantification processes in the fields of social sciences and science and technology studies (STS). More specifically, we address the role of numbers in government and State narratives and we introduce debates on the role of classifications, on scalar effects, and on the use of numbers on technologies of government.
The Sociology of statistics - possibilities of a new field of investigation
História, Ciências, Saúde - Manguinhos, 2009
This article presents some possibilities for investigation unveiled by the sociology of statistics. Of particular importance in the area of demand is the power to provide the fundamentals used in government technologies in nation-states (political domain). In terms of the use of statistics, the role in forming the categories of perceptions of reality (cognitive domain) is highlighted. Within the scope of production (institutional domain), it is important to emphasize the organization of the activity into different temporalities. The tensions between the technical/normative advances recommended by scientific associations and the pragmatic requirements of public administration are also examined. This article seeks to provide a brief reflection on the morphology and the scientific culture of statistical institutions.
After the crisis? Big Data and the methodological challenges of empirical sociology
Big Data & Society, 2014
Google Trends reveals that at the time we were writing our article on ‘The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology’ in 2007 almost nobody was searching the internet for ‘Big Data’. It was only towards the very end of 2010 that the term began to register, just ahead of an explosion of interest from 2011 onwards. In this commentary we take the opportunity to reflect back on the claims we made in that original paper in light of more recent discussions about the social scientific implications of the inundation of digital data. Did our paper, with its emphasis on the emergence of, what we termed, ‘social transactional data’ and ‘digital byproduct data’ prefigure contemporary debates that now form the basis and rationale for this excellent new journal? Or was the paper more concerned with broader methodological, theoretical and political debates that have somehow been lost in all of the loud babble that has come to surround Big Data. Using recent work on the BBC Great British Class Survey as...
PROSPECTIVE MODEL OF OFFICIAL STATISTICS FOR THE DIGITAL AGE
SSRN Electronic journal, 2020
This paper describes key aspects of the structural and functional transformation of the Russian state statistics system as a core element of the future National Data Management System. Issues such as establishing a dialogue between the statistics service and users, integrating data from various sources, and intelligent data processing in the context of the digitalization of the economy are considered. New approaches and mechanisms should integrate and advance all of the previously achieved best results in methodology, observation areas, metrics, and other domains. Improvement areas include providing higher-quality information for policy shaping, businesses, individuals, and external partners. National statistics is expected to present an interconnected, objectively measurable model of socioeconomic processes and phenomena based on relevant theoretical concepts. In addition to using various sources of data, a necessary feature of the new system will be its reliance on a consistent conceptual framework and approaches to interpreting data, which will make it possible to integrate various data sources in the first place. Users of intelligent statistics are becoming not only active participants in primary data collection, accumulation and application processes, but are turning into “smart” consumers who develop statistical thinking and are able to derive the greatest possible benefits from the use of statistical data. Such skills should become an inherent (and possibly mandatory) component of any.
Quantification and objectivity: from statistical conventions to social conventions
Historical Social Research, 2016
»Quantifizierung und Objektivität. Von statistischen Konventionen zu sozialen Konventionen«. Standard quantification processes and most often their analysis are derived from statistics' technique and approach. Social conventions are at the core of daily life, practical knowledge and coordination between people; statistical conventions are at the heart of cognitive activities developed by statisticians. What does quantification mean when addressed from the wider point of view of social conventions? This article analyzes the differences between social and statistical conventions. It enlarges the concept of objectivity in having recourse to the lenses of the plurality of worlds as defined by the economics of convention (EC), and to the concept of the informational basis of judgement in justice introduced by Amartya Sen. A wider conception of quantification processes in the social world can thus be elaborated, which opens fresh views on what become, in these processes, the concepts of facts and democracy.