Gender: A Postmodern Idea Developed in Association with the Modern Concept of Sex in Considering the Implications for Evolving Sexuality (original) (raw)
Related papers
Chapter 10: Gender and Sexuality, 2023 updated version
Perspectives: An Open Introduction to Cultural Anthropology, 2nd Edition (Revised 2023) , 2023
Anthropologists are fond of pointing out that much of what we take for granted as “natural” in our lives is actually cultural—it is not grounded in nature or in biology but invented by humans. Because culture is invented, it takes different forms in different places and changes over time. Living in the twenty-first century, we have witnessed how rapidly and dramatically culture can change, from ways of communicating to the emergence of same-sex marriage. Similarly, many of us live in culturally diverse settings and experience how varied human cultural inventions can be. We readily accept that clothing, language, and music are cultural—invented, created, and alterable—but often find it difficult to accept that gender and sexuality are not natural but deeply embedded in culture. We struggle with the idea that the division of humans into two and only two categories, “male” and “female,” is not universal. How can male and female be cultural concepts that take different forms and have different meanings cross-culturally? This chapter, newly revised for 2023, addresses these questions as it explores the anthropology of gender and sexuality. {See https://pressbooks.pub/perspectives/chapter/gender-and-sexuality/ for the online version, or download the chapter here.}
Gender and Sexuality, 2020 version
Perspectives: An Open Invitation to Cultural Anthropology, 2nd Ed., 2020
Anthropologists are fond of pointing out that much of what we take for granted as "natural" in our lives is actually cultural-it is not grounded in the natural world or in biology but invented by humans. 2 Because culture is invented, it takes different forms in different places and changes over time in those places. Living in the twenty-first century, we have witnessed how rapidly and dramatically culture can change, from ways of communicating to the emergence of same-sex marriage. Similarly, many of us live in culturally diverse settings and experience how varied human cultural inventions can be.
A Symbiological Approach to Sex, Gender, and Desire in the Anthropocene
Angelaki, 2017
The first part of this essay describes a symbiological approach to gender and sexuality; the second, a symbiological approach to world literatures and some examples of gender and sexuality in symbiological literatures. Both are intended to provide more intimate accounts of the Anthropocene than the typical big pictures of global warming and climate change. While grand and world-historical, to be sure, the Anthropocene also affects the most intimate aspects of our lives. Both sex and gender should be understood as the outcomes of developmental processes more or less stabilised by a wide variety of more or less variable factors in the loop of nature, culture, and technology. Understanding the nature of these processes and their social, biological, and technological causes is essential for comprehending the nature of gender, sex, and sexuality, and the extent to which these are mutable. The essay concludes with some reflections on love in the Anthropocene. Recent developments in molecular biology imply that classic distinctions between nature and nurture or biology and culture are not applicable to the human ecological niche. Research in epigenetics shows that the effects of culture on nature go all the way down to the gene and up to the stratosphere, and the effects of biology on culture are similarly inextricable (Gilbert; Griffiths; Meloni). Living systems almost invariably involve the interaction of many kinds of organisms with a diversity of technologies. The
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 2021
Introduction: Brain differences between men and women 1 Traditionally it was accepted that humanity consisted of only two sexes, male and female, and although their genders should be considered as equal, men were (and are) in many cultures viewed as superior to women. This will however not be discussed. Moir and Jessel (1989), in their book Brainsex, point out that the sexes are different, not in a typical sociological or cultural sense, but because their brains differ: The brain, the chief administrative and emotional organ of life, is differently constructed in men and women; it processes information in a different way, which results in different perceptions, priorities and behaviour. (p. 5) Until relatively recently the differences between men and women 'have been explained away by social conditioning' such as (Moir & Jessel 1989): The expectations of parents, whose own attitudes, in turn, reflect the expectations of society; little boys are told that they shouldn't cry, and that the way to the top depends on masculine assertion and aggression. (p. 5) This article broadly discusses the building blocks of sexuality by referring to differences in brain development in the womb, specific genetic factors influencing sex-reversal phenotypes and how they give rise to different sexes and sexual orientations. Gender identity and expression are reviewed, and a practical road map is presented within which religious denominations can responsibly engage with human sexuality, especially samesex lifestyles, within their spheres of influence. Our concerns, discussions and suggestions about this all-important facet of humanity are based on the intellectual richness and research of numerous scientists over an extended period of time in order to point out the most important building blocks of sexuality. Following a qualitative methodological approach, the article starts with the brain differences between men and women as determined in the womb. It is followed by a discussion of the 'five sexes' proposed by Anne Fausto-Sterling, the spectrum of human sexual characteristics and the birth of sexual orientations. The article then looks at bisexuality, gender identity and expression, and before our concluding remarks, at biology and how religion should deal with sexuality, more specifically homosexuality. However, we do not pay attention to animal sexual behaviour, paedophilia, bestiality, gender differences in behaviour and public response to research findings on sexual differentiations in the brain. Contribution: This article is part of a special collection that reflects on the evolutionary building blocks of our past, present and future. It is not only based on historical thought but also contemporary research. It fits well with the intersectional and interdisciplinary nature of this collection and journal.
A Review of: “Handbook of the Evolution of Human Sexuality. Edited by Michael Kauth.”
Journal of Sex Research, 2008
The Handbook of the Evolution of Human Sexuality, hereafter HEHS, published simultaneously as a special issue of Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, has as a principal goal the presentation of theories and research on the evolution of human sexuality. The editor, Michael Kauth, claims that, unlike any previous evolutionary-based text on human sexuality, HEHS is written for an academic audience that is relatively new to evolutionary theorizing. Accordingly, the Introduction and the first chapter, both written by Kauth, provide outlines of issues with which evolutionary psychologists are likely to be very familiar. These include such basic evolutionary concepts as ultimate and proximate causes and natural and sexual selection, as well as brief histories and critiques of eugenics, sociobiology and evolutionary psychology.
2017
Anthropologists are fond of pointing out that much of what we take for granted as "natural" in our lives is actually cultural-it is not grounded in the natural world or in biology but invented by humans. 2 Because culture is invented, it takes different forms in different places and changes over time in those places. Living in the twenty-first century, we have witnessed how rapidly and dramatically culture can change, from ways of communicating to the emergence of same-sex marriage. Similarly, many of us live in culturally diverse settings and experience how varied human cultural inventions can be. We readily accept that clothing, language, and music are cultural-invented, created, and alterable-but often find it difficult to accept that gender and sexuality are not natural but deeply embedded in and shaped by culture. We struggle with the idea that the division of humans into two and only two categories, "male" and "female," is not universal, that "male" and "female" are cultural concepts that take different forms and have different meanings cross-culturally. Similarly, human sexuality, rather than being simply natural is one of the most culturally significant, shaped, regulated, and symbolic of all human capacities. The concept of humans as either "heterosexual" or "homosexual" is a culturally and historically specific invention that is increasingly being challenged in the United States and elsewhere.
2017
Author: Heinz-Jürgen Voss, www.heinzjuergenvoss.de Short description: Judith Butler once critiqued binary approaches to biological sex on the level of the interpretation of signs, thus avoiding a discussion of actually existing organic structures and their possible binarity. By contrast, the following contribution is concerned with historical and contemporary biological theories about such structures. Tracing theories of preformation and epigenetics, “Making Sex Revisited” demonstrates that a focus on processes of evolution and differentiation leads to pluri-sexual approaches to biological sex. Organic structures develop individually and vary when various individuals are compared. The predominance of binary interpretations results from the distinction between two sexes and their unequal treatment, still prevalent in society.
Sexuality is Over. Long Live Asexuality: Post-Sexuality in the Post-Post Era
Asexualities: Feminist and Queer Perspectives, Revised and Expanded Ten-Year Anniversary Edition, 2024
This chapter examines asexuality as a posthumanist response to a world that is increasingly unthinkable, and proposes to view asexuality as an orientation signaling the next stage in sexuality's unfolding. Analyzing how capitalism distorted and coopted the sexual freedom advocacy of the sex wars era, and how women's dissatisfaction with traditional notions of (hetero)sexuality can pave the way for alternative expressions of desire, this chapter envisions a post-sexual future liberated from sexuality's hegemony; a future where asexuality, alongside other diverse expressions of human connection and pleasure, offers a transformative path toward liberation. Building upon Michel Foucault's concept of “the end of the monarchy of sex,” and posthumanist theories of “peak libido” and “libidinal exhaustion,” this contribution argues that our libidinal impulses are far from being endangered—they are moving toward non-sexual outlets.