Mencius and Augustine: A Feminine Face in the Personal, the Social, and the Political (original) (raw)
2023, Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Mencius (Springer)
Although Mencius (4th century BCE) and Augustine (356-430 CE) were centuries apart with very different philosophical vocabulary and metaphysical outlook, both thinkers were progressive in their positive assessment of feminism characteristics. They brought the hidden feminine element in their respective traditions to the foreground. Both thinkers emphasize the affective dimension of morality and propose a political philosophy built on love and the family model. Contrary to accepted cultural norms, they repudiated the viewpoint that regards the female body and female gender as merely a means to an end. Strongly opposing the stance of social contractarianism and political realism, they espoused a social-political theory based on a developmental and relational account of human being and embraced a complementary model of cooperation, care, and governance rooted in humaneness and rightness, love and justice. For published version, please visit: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-27620-0\_30#citeas
Related papers
Aristotelian and Cartesian Revolutions in the Philosophy of Man and Woman
Dialogue, 1987
Today a “new” field of philosophy has emerged which can be called simply “The Philosophy of Man and Woman”. Paradoxically, it is a field of study with a long and impressive history which began when the pre-Socratic philosophers first questioned their own identity in the midst of the world. Their questions fall into four broad areas:1. How is the male “opposite” to the female?2. What roles do male and female play in the generation and identity of offspring?3. Are women and men wise in the same or different ways?4. Are women and men good in the same or different ways?
Communitas and the Problem of Women.” Angelaki 18:3 (Sept. 2013)
Abstract From its earliest beginnings, political thought has grappled with the problem of those who both do and do not belong to the city, those who cannot be exactly included or excluded, that is to say, with the problem of difference. Most often this emerges first as the problem of what to do with women. Communitas is an intense engagement with central figures in the history of political thought – Augustine, Hobbes, Rousseau – but also a remarkably efficient avoidance of women and difference. Even as he deals with Augustine, who cannot stop discussing begetting and desire, and Hobbes, who insists on the maternal right of nature, Esposito’s attention remains fixed on the fraternal violence rather than parental sex as the founding of community, and the result is a strangely phallic work.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.