Prevalence and risk factors of actinic keratoses in Germany - analysis of multisource data (original) (raw)
Related papers
Risk factors for actinic keratosis in eight European centres: a case-control study
British Journal of Dermatology, 2012
Background There are limited data regarding the association of actinic keratosis (AK) and other types of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC); studies investigating possible correlation of AK with melanocytic naevi are even scarcer. To our knowledge, there are no data examining the risk of AK in people using specific medications. Objective To investigate constitutional and exposure risk factors leading to AK and the coexistence of AK with NMSC and melanoma. Methods A multicentre hospital-based case-control study was performed in Fin
Prevalence of Actinic Keratosis in Different Regions of Spain: The EPIQA Study
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas, 2018
Actinic keratoses (AKs) are common cutaneous lesions that develop as a result of ultraviolet (UV) radiation damage. 1 Risk factors associated with AKs include advanced age, male gender, high degree of sun and/or artificial UV exposure, and fair skin. 2 Epidemiological studies within Europe are limited and have provided highly variable estimates of AK point 100% 80%
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2015
Actinic keratosis (AK) is a frequent health condition attributable to chronic exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Several treatment options are available and evidence based guidelines are missing. The goal of these evidence- and consensus-based guidelines was the development of treatment recommendations appropriate for different subgroups of patients presenting with AK. A secondary aim of these guidelines was the implementation of knowledge relating to the clinical background of AK, including consensus-based recommendations for the histopathological definition, diagnosis and the assessment of patients. The guidelines development followed a pre-defined and structured process. For the underlying systematic literature review of interventions for AK, the methodology suggested by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and ...
British Journal of Dermatology, 2019
Background The high prevalence of actinic keratosis (AK) requires the optimal use of healthcare resources. Objectives To gain insight in to the healthcare utilization of people with AK in a population-based cohort, and the management of AK in a primary and secondary care setting. Methods A retrospective cohort study using three complementary data sources was conducted to describe the use of care, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with AK in the Netherlands. Data sources consisted of a population-based cohort study (Rotterdam Study), routine general practitioner (GP) records (Integrated Primary Care Information) and nationwide claims data (DRG Information System). Results In the population-based cohort (Rotterdam Study), 69% (918 of 1322) of participants diagnosed with AK during a skin-screening visit had no previous AKrelated visit in their GP record. This proportion was 50% for participants with extensive AK (i.e. ≥ 10 AKs; n = 270). Cryotherapy was the most used AK treatment by both GPs (78%) and dermatologists (41-56%). Topical agents were the second most used treatment by dermatologists (13-21%) but were rarely applied in primary care (2%). During the first AK-related GP visit, 31% (171 of 554) were referred to a dermatologist, and the likelihood of being referred was comparable between low-and high-risk patients, which is inconsistent with the Dutch general practitioner guidelines for 'suspicious skin lesions' from 2017. Annually, 40 000 new claims representing 13% of all dermatology claims were labelled as cutaneous premalignancy. Extensive follow-up rates (56%) in secondary care were registered, while only 18% received a claim for a subsequent cutaneous malignancy in 5 years. Conclusions AK management seems to diverge from guidelines in both primary and secondary care. Underutilization of field treatments, inappropriate treatments and high referral rates without proper risk stratification in primary care, combined with extensive follow-up in secondary care result in the inefficient use of healthcare resources and overburdening in secondary care. Efforts directed to better risk differentiation and guideline adherence may prove useful in increasing the efficiency in AK management. What's already known about this topic? • The prevalence of actinic keratosis (AK) is high and, in particular, multiple AKs are a strong skin cancer predictor.
Actinic keratosis: a clinical and epidemiological revision
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 2012
Actinic keratoses are benign intraepithelial skin neoplasms constituted by atypical proliferation of keratinocytes that may evolve to squamous cell carcinoma. They develop in photoexposed skin areas; they are induced mainly by ultraviolet radiation and are considered cutaneous markers of chronic exposure to sunlight. They develop mainly in adults and older, fair skinned individuals, and are the fourth most common cause of dermatologic consultation in Brazil. Damage to the apoptosis pathway in photoexposed epithelium favors cellular proliferation and the permanence of the lesions. In this revision, the authors assemble the main epidemiological data regarding this disease and suggest that strategies to identify risky phenotypes, early diagnosis, adequate treatment, clinical follow-up, stimulus to skin self examination, photoeducation and photoprotection should be promoted with the aim of avoiding the progression to malignancy and also the prevention and the diagnose of concomitant neoplasms also induced by ultraviolet radiation.
A GP’s guide to actinic keratosis
2016
ctinic keratoses (AKs) are superficial, discrete, erythematous and scaly skin lesions. They are also known as solar keratoses or ‘sunspots’. AKs are found predominantly on sun-exposed areas such as the scalp, face and forearms.1 Globally, Australians have the highest rate of AK development, resulting in a prevalence of 40 to 60% among the Caucasian population above the age of 40 years.1,2 Not surprisingly, the treatment of AK often falls under the responsibility of GPs so it is important to be aware of the full range of available treatment options.
The importance of early diagnosis and treatment of actinic keratosis
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2013
Chronic, long-term sun exposure results in genetic changes in epidermal keratinocytes and the development of various skin lesions ranging from actinic keratosis (AK) to skin cancer. AK lesions may first appear as rough, scaly spots on sun-exposed skin, and, although most individual AK lesions do not become invasive cancers, the majority of invasive squamous cell carcinomas originate from AK. Genetic analysis demonstrates that ultraviolet radiationeinduced mutations and changes in gene expression are present in squamous cell carcinoma, AK, and clinically normal-appearing perilesional sun-exposed skin, which supports the progressive nature of keratinocyte transformation. The presence of certain clinical features, such as large size, ulceration, or bleeding, suggests an increased risk of disease progression. The risk is also increased by evidence of extensive solar damage, advanced age, and immunosuppression. Early diagnosis and consideration for treatment are indicated to clear actinically damaged sites and diminish the risk of invasive squamous cell carcinoma. ( J Am Acad Dermatol 2013;68:S20-7.)
Actinic Keratosis: Rationale and Management
Dermatology and Therapy, 2014
Actinic keratoses (AKs) are common skin lesions heralding an increased risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and other skin malignancies, arising principally due to excessive ultraviolet (UV) exposure. They are predominantly found in fair-skinned individuals, and increasingly, are a problem of the immunosuppressed. AKs may regress spontaneously, remain stable or transform to invasive SCC. The risk of SCC increases for those with more than 5 AKs, and the majority of SCCs arise from AKs. The main mechanisms of AK formation are inflammation, oxidative stress, immunosuppression, impaired apoptosis, mutagenesis, dysregulation of cell growth and proliferation, and tissue remodeling. Human papilloma virus has also been implicated in the formation of some AKs. Understanding these mechanisms guides the rationale behind the current available treatments for AKs. One of the main principles underpinning the management of AKs is that of field cancerization. Wide areas of skin are exposed to increasing amounts of UV light and other environmental insults as we age. This is especially true for the head, neck and forearms. These insults do not target only the skin where individual lesions develop, but also large areas where crops of AKs may appear. The skin between lesions is exposed to the same insults and is likely to contain as-yet undetectable preclinical lesions or areas of dysplastic cells. The whole affected area is known as the 'field'. Management is therefore divided into lesion-directed and field-directed therapies. Current therapies include lesiondirected cryotherapy and/or excision, and topical field-directed creams: 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, diclofenac, photodynamic therapy and ingenol mebutate. Combining lesion-and field-directed therapies has yielded good results Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (and several novel therapies are under investigation. Treatment is variable and tailored to the individual making a gold standard management algorithm difficult to design. This literature review article aims to describe the rationale behind the best available therapies for AKs in light of current understanding of pathophysiology and epidemiology. A PubMed and MEDLINE search of literature was performed between
Randomized Trial of Four Treatment Approaches for Actinic Keratosis
New England Journal of Medicine
BACKGROUND Actinic keratosis is the most frequent premalignant skin disease in the white population. In current guidelines, no clear recommendations are made about which treatment is preferred. METHODS We investigated the effectiveness of four frequently used field-directed treatments (for multiple lesions in a continuous area). Patients with a clinical diagnosis of five or more actinic keratosis lesions on the head, involving one continuous area of 25 to 100 cm 2 , were enrolled at four Dutch hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 5% fluorouracil cream, 5% imiquimod cream, methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT), or 0.015% ingenol mebutate gel. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a reduction of 75% or more in the number of actinic keratosis lesions from baseline to 12 months after the end of treatment. Both a modified intention-to-treat analysis and a perprotocol analysis were performed. RESULTS A total of 624 patients were included from November 2014 through March 2017. At 12 months after the end of treatment, the cumulative probability of remaining free from treatment failure was significantly higher among patients who received fluorouracil (74.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 66.8 to 81.0) than among those who received imiquimod (53.9%; 95% CI, 45.4 to 61.6), MAL-PDT (37.7%; 95% CI, 30.0 to 45.3), or ingenol mebutate (28.9%; 95% CI, 21.8 to 36.3). As compared with fluorouracil, the hazard ratio for treatment failure was 2.03 (95% CI, 1.36 to 3.04) with imiquimod, 2.73 (95% CI, 1.87 to 3.99) with MAL-PDT, and 3.33 (95% CI, 2.29 to 4.85) with ingenol mebutate (P≤0.001 for all comparisons). No unexpected toxic effects were documented. CONCLUSIONS At 12 months after the end of treatment in patients with multiple actinic keratosis lesions on the head, 5% fluorouracil cream was the most effective of four fielddirected treatments.
Attitudes among dermatologists regarding actinic keratosis treatment options
Dermatology Reports, 2022
Actinic keratosis (AK) is considered a precancerous lesion that can develop into invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Its prevalence is increasing, and it is estimated that it affects between 1% and 44% of the adult population worldwide. Advanced age, fair skin phototypes, and cumulative sun exposure are the main risk factors for AK. Therapies for AK consists of lesion-directed treatment (i.e., cryotherapy, curettage, electrocoagulation, and laser therapy) or field therapy [i.e., photodynamic therapy (PDT), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), diclofenac sodium (DIC), imiquimod (IMQ), and ingenol mebutate (Ing Meb)]. The type of therapy chosen is determined by the number and location of AKs, the patient's condition, and the patient's tolerability and compliance. In this survey, we collected information from 110 Italian dermatologists about their knowledge and attitudes toward various AK therapeutic approaches. In our study, we discovered that cryotherapy and PDT are the most used treatments for AK, while surgery and laser therapy are the least commonly used. The most commonly used topical therapies are DIC and IMQ 3.75 percent cream, followed by IMQ 5 percent cream, Ing Meb, and 5-FU. The correct treatment for AK can be difficult to choose, but adherence to therapy is critical for good results. Given the high and continuing rise in the incidence of AK, dermatologists' knowledge of various therapeutic approaches is critical.