Theorizing and practizing organizational culture and diversity : a case study (original) (raw)
Related papers
One Step Forward, or Two Steps Back? Diversity Management And Gender In Organizational Analysis
This paper describes a beginning analysis of the diversity management discourse that has emerged over the past fifteen years (approximately). Using an approach based on Foucaldian historical analysis, it begins by asking how it is possible that this discourse emerged; what conditions supported its emergence and what forms has it taken? Origins of the discourse are in the perceived need of consultants for a suitable response to the backlash to legislated change. The body of knowledge was given a scientific basis by using parallel scholarship in such areas as organizational culture and group composition research, and eventually, organizational demographics was invoked as the appropriate 'scientific' approach.
Theories of Diversity within Organisation Studies: Debates and Future Trajectories
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
Theories on diversity and diversity management within the field of Organisation Studies started to develop in the 80s, mainly under the influence of managerial reports pointing towards the increasing diversity of the future workforce. The purpose of this paper was to 1) review the existing studies on diversity identifying their main purposes, 2) identify the current debates in the field, and 3) point towards possible future directions. Studies on diversity seem to have a two-fold purpose. A first purpose is to identify discriminatory practices in the workplace. Several studies have examined the working experiences of minority groups, inducing our attention to phenomena such as the glassceiling effect (e.g.
Critical Perspectives on Diversity in Organizations
2020
Decades of investigations into diversity in the workplace have created mixed answers about what kinds of effects it has on employees and teams, and whether or not it can be managed effectively to generate positive outcomes for organizations. In contrast to mainstream work from management and psychology, critical views on workplace diversity have emerged that seek to grasp more fully the messy social and political realities of workplace diversity as they operate in context. Critical Perspectives on Diversity in Organizations therefore seeks to review, integrate, and build upon emerging critical perspectives on workplace diversity to help give a fuller understanding of how employee differences affect workplace interactions, relationships, employment, inequality, culture, and society. Critical perspectives help to fill in and openly recognize many of the more far-reaching issues that pure management and psychology approaches can leave out-issues of power, inequality, politics, history, culture, and lived experiences. If organizations do not try to take these issues into account and critically reflect on them, then diversity management is likely to remain a relatively blunt instrument or worse, a hollow piece of rhetoric. This book will be of interest to international graduate students and researchers working on topics associated with equality, diversity, and inclusion in organizations, as well as various organizational practitioners and activists engaged with these issues.
Diversity Management: Towards a Theory of Gender Sensitive Practices
The resource-based view of the organization conceptualizes diversity as a valuable, scarce and difficult to imitate resource. The phenomenon of diversity, specifically gender diversity, is fast becoming an inevitable reality for the contemporary organizations as an increasing number of female workers are joining the formal work force both in the developed as well as the developing world. While ample focus exists upon recruitment, managerial training and a change in overall culture of the organization for effective diversity management, empirical research to study the share of organizational practices in creating a conducive (or hostile) work climate for the newer variety of workers remains sparse. This qualitative research study, conducted in the public sector using the Federal Civil Service of Pakistan as the context, purported to examine the role of organizational practices in the overall agenda of managing (or mismanaging) diversity in the organizations. It was revealed from the empirical data of this study that the so called "gender neutral" practices of the organizations, pertaining to facetime system24/7, job rotation and training & development, are in fact thoroughly oriented towards the traditional male worker and evidently responsible for creating a significant stumbling block in the job performance of female employees. It was also found that the organizations" bid to cater the heterogeneous work force of today with the homogeneous policies of yesterday is in direct discord with the basic tenet of diversity management pertaining to acknowledging, supporting and appreciating the heterogeneous perspectives and proves counterproductive in carrying out the diversity agenda. The paper discusses policy implications in view of the changing landscape of our work organizations and emphasizes on diversity management practices using gender sensitive rather than gender neutral practices at workplace.
The growing heterogeneity of workplaces in the last few decades has turned the interest in workplace diversity into the bon-ton of many managers and organizational researchers. Recent social changes, including globalization, the growing number of multinational corporations, and the mass migration of waves of job-seekers and war refugees from developing countries to Europe and the United States , have accelerated the awareness of difference and prompted many HR mangers to seek ways to "manage" diversity-that is, not only to see diversity as something that has to be "dealt with" or "coped with," but also to use it as a managerial tool for increasing production and creativity in work teams. Much of this literature has been led by American researchers who have sought to advance a reactive approach against discrimination and prejudice; only in the 1990s did critical researchers, inspired mostly by feminist, post-colonial, and/or post-structural theories, begin to seriously challenge this approach by exploring power relations related to diversity both in local and global contexts. The melting-pot approach, which encouraged assimilation into the hegemonic culture and which was the most accepted approach in organizations and in research, is now being increasingly replaced by a celebration of pluralism that does not necessitate putting aside one's cultural ideologies and lifestyle. In this respect, the editors of The Oxford Handbook of Diversity in Organizations-Regine Bendl, Inge Bleijenbergh, Elina Henttonen, and Albert Mills-make a substantial contribution to these attempts to promote a pluralistic and critical understanding of diversity in the workplace.
Diversity Management and Gender Issues in Organizations
Deyeren S. J, Benson J. A, 2023
Diversity refers to the variety or multiplicity of demographic features that characterize a company's workforce, particularly in terms of race, gender, culture, national origin, handicap, age and religion. Diversity is differences among people in age, gender, race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, socioeconomic background, and capabilities/disabilities. Using the desk research method to acquire and analyze secondary data, the paper concluded that diverse workforce is not an option to be treated without keen attention for contemporary organisations due to the nature of work, globalisation, the demand for quality products, the demand for quality employees etc, insisting that a diversified workforce is a necessity.
Examining Diversity in Organizations from Critical Perspectives
Oxford Handbooks Online, 2016
In this chapter we discuss how examining diversity in organizations from critical perspectives influences all phases of the research process. It affects the framing of research questions, the selection of research strategies, the collection of sources and analysis of data, the assessment of the role of the researcher and the theoretical contribution the research makes. Examining diversity in organizations from critical perspectives calls for research questions that, for example, examine organizational norms, reveal the intersection of different identity categories, or examine the interplay between agency and structure. They authors plea for taking the empirical perspective of the marginalized ‘other’ in the centre of the analysis and for an active reflection upon the role of the researchers in producing knowledge. Such an approach would takes both the agency of the researcher and the examined into consideration.