Crossing the doorsteps for social reform: The social crusades of Florence Kelley and Ellen Richards (original) (raw)
2023, Science in Context
This paper contrasts the research strategies of two women reformers, Florence Kelley and Ellen Swallow Richards, which entailed different strategies of social reform. In the early 1890s, social activist Florence Kelley used the social survey as a weapon for legal reform of the working conditions of women and children in Chicago's sweatshop system. Kelley's case shows that her surveys were most effective as "grounded" knowledge, rooted in a local community with which she was well acquainted. Her social survey, re-enacted by lawmakers and the press, provided the evidence that moved her target audience to legal action. Chemist and propagator of the Home Economics Movement Ellen Richards situated the social problem, and hence its solution, not in exploitative working conditions, but in the inefficient and wasteful usage of available resources by the poor. Laboratory work, she argued, would enable the development of optimal standards, and educational programs should bring these standards to the household by means of models and exhibits. With this aim, she constructed public spaces that she ran as food laboratories and sanitary experiments. Kelley and Richards thus crossed the doorsteps of the household in very different ways. While Florence Kelley entered the household to change the living and working conditions of the poor by changing the law, Richards flipped the household inside out by bringing women into hybrid public laboratory spaces to change their behavior by experiment and instruction.
Related papers
The feminist tactic of articulating the private as publicly relevant has received a significant amount of scholarly attention in two historical contexts: the nineteenth century project of framing women (i.e., mothers) as expert authorities on providing and maintaining domestic spaces fit for the reproduction of an engaged and productive citizenry (“Republican Motherhood”), and the 1960s and ‘70s women’s liberation movement’s assertion that “the personal is political.” This project identifies a third historical moment in which domestic or private issues were made public, but without the feminist goals of locating autonomy, authority, and agency in women. With the rise of industrialization and consumerism in late nineteenth-century America, housekeeping, nutrition, and childrearing were rearticulated not as the bailiwicks of competent housewives, but as sites of pathology that required the intervention of scientific experts. Through a close reading of articles and advertisements in fin de siècle issues of Ladies’ Home Journal that address various domestic issues around housekeeping and childrearing methods, I identify the ways in which the American (white, middle class) housewife was robbed of her authority and autonomy despite the seemingly feminist practice of shedding public light on private matters.
Inventing a Space to Speak: Ethos, Agency and United States' Woman Suffrage Cookbooks (1886–1916)
Gender & History, 2021
During the last forty years of the United States’ fight for woman suffrage, a handful of suffragists wrote cookbooks sponsored by suffrage organisations. These cookbooks created a rhetorical space and ethos within and through the kitchen. Because their activism was grounded in expected feminine actions, this home‐bound ethos allowed the primarily white, middle‐class suffragists to simultaneously advocate for women's suffrage in public and maintain their adherence to the Cult of True Womanhood. The arguments put forth in the cookbooks illustrate an ethos that is influenced by both personal agency and the rhetor's gendered, physical location in the kitchen. From this expected space, they made the more revolutionary argument for suffrage less discrediting.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.