LANGUAGE AND PHILOSOPHY: AN APPRAISAL OF HEIDEGGER’S LINGUISTIC PRINCIPLES (original) (raw)
Related papers
Heidegger on Philosophy and Language
This paper attempts to explain why Heidegger’s thought has evoked both positive and negative reactions of such an extreme nature by focussing on his answer to the central methodological question “What is Philosophy?” After briefly setting forth Heidegger’s answer in terms of attunement to Being, the centrality to it of his view of language and by focussing on his relationship with the word ‘philosophy’ and with the history of philosophy, the author shows how it has led Heidegger to construct his own work, itself linguistic, as a self-referential union of form and meaning. It is suggested that, from a Heideggerian perspective, this gives his work added argumentative force but, conversely, allows the critic no point of entry into his hermeneutical circle – hence the extreme reactions. This observation is then applied to address a related critical question; it is used to make sense of the apparent distinction, in Heidegger’s work, between talking about attunement to Being and actually effecting such an attunement. The author argues that, for Heidegger, there is actually no distinction and that his apparent descriptions of attunement to Being at once describe and effect such an attunement. This union can therefore be conceived as one dimension of the intimacy, previously observed, between form and content and which is recognised to be a feature of Heidegger’s work by both the acolyte and the critic.
Heidegger and the Philosophy of Language
Auslegung: a Journal of Philosophy
Philosophical research will have to dispense with the "philosophy of language" if it is to inquire into "the things themselves" and attain the status of a problematic which has been cleared up conceptually. (Heidegger, Being and Time, pp. 209-210.) How curious, that stating is to be a laying. Do we intend with this reference to shake the foundation of all philology and philosophy of language, and to expose them as sham [Schein]? Indeed we do.
Martin Heidegger and the Language Problem
The aim of this paper is to discuss the possibilities of language through a Heideggerian approach, situated mainly in Sein und Zeit, still observing the limit concept in Wittgenstein and the possibilities of the "faculty" of Aristotle's logos in its ontological and ontic perspective, shared in the context of the world of life and how they orient existence. We emphasize the value of intersubjective aspects of the seizure of Dasein in the language and their representations, through modes of intelligibility (hermeneutics, representation, discourse), the openness and accessibility ζῷον λόγον ἔχον.
Heidegger and the world-yielding role of language
The Journal of Value Inquiry, 1993
The nature of language is a major concern of Heidegger in his later works. His contribution to the philosophy of language consists of a few general insights which identify and amend fundamental presumptions concerning language taken for granted in modem philosophy and philology. Since this thinking about language remains at a general level it does not vie with the insights gained within so-called philosophy of language or within linguistic science which take as self-evident what Heidegger considers problematic. One such general insight concerns the connection between language and the world. The first indication of this connection is given in Being and Time, 1 where in the discussion of Dasein's disclosedness, that is, Dasein's "there," linguistic articulation (Rede), along with disposition (Befindlichkeit) and comprehension (Verstehen), are described as constituting Dasein's disclosure of its world. Hints about this connection are given in the Essence of Ground 2 and in The Origin of the Work of Art. 3 In "H/51derlin and the Essence of Poetry" Heidegger openly asserts that "only where there is language is there the world. ''4 This assertion is elaborated in some of the essays on language composed by Heidegger in the 1950s. More comprehensive treatments of the issue are presented in the lecture-essays titled "Language ''5 (Die Sprache-composed, 1950) and "The Nature of Language ''6 (Das Wesen der Sprache-composed, 1957-58). Whereas some fine expositions of Heidegger's stance on the nature and role of language in human existence have already been published by Heidegger scholars, the connection between the concurrent origination of a world and a linguistic horizon for human existence has not been adequately traced in these studies of Heidegger's later work. His contribution to our understanding of language cannot be fully appreciated without a broader assessment of his preoccupation with the world-concept in the whole expanse of his early and later writings. Thus, the aim of the present essay is twofold: (1) to reassess and expose Heidegger's thought concerning language, without neglecting the vital language-world connection outlined
2013
Working from newly available texts in Heidegger’s Complete Works, Krzysztof Ziarek presents Heidegger at his most radical and demonstrates how the thinker’s daring use of language is an integral part of his philosophical expression. Ziarek emphasizes the liberating potential of language as an event that discloses being and amplifies Heidegger’s call for a transformative approach to poetry, power, and ultimately, philosophy.
Heidegger and the Dialogue on Language
Aoristo - International Journal of Phenomenology, Hermeneutics and Metaphysics, 2021
Our aim is to think about the dialogue between a Japanese and a inquirer, entitled Aus einem Gespräch von der Sprache. Zwischen einem Japaner und einem Fragendem (1953-54). We try to argue that, although there is no philosophy of language in Martin Heidegger there is a powerful language design that marks the relationship with the being. Language becomes a saying that is an appropriation of what is given, that is, of what appears and becomes present. It is this relationship with the appearing that shows the power and mystery of language.