Appropriate Versus Inappropriate Antibiotic Administration, Prior To Versus After the Diagnosis of Septic Shock. Impact on Patients with Sepsis Admitted to a Saudi Intensive Care Unit (original) (raw)
Related papers
European Journal of Internal Medicine, 2019
Background: Sepsis has been associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aims were to determine predictors of mortality among patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) and to ascertain the role of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) in predicting poor outcomes. Methods: All internal medicine patients with BSIs at the Hospital of Jura, Switzerland during a three year period (July 2014 to June 2017) were included. Results: Among 404 BSIs, Escherichia coli represented the most common species isolated (156 episodes; 38.6%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (68; 16.8%). The most common site of infection was urinary tract accounting for 39.6% of BSIs (160 episodes). Thirty-day mortality was 18.1%. Multivariate analysis revealed BSI due to staphylococci, malignancy (haematologic or solid organ), qSOFA≥2 points, Pitt bacteraemia score as independent predictors of mortality, while appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy and administration of antibiotic therapy within three hours from infection's recognition were identified as a predictor of good prognosis. qSOFA showed the highest sensitivity (87.7%), negative predictive value (96.6%) and accuracy (0.83) as compared to other scores. Mortality among 141 septic patients was 45.4%. Malignancy (haematologic or solid organ), primary BSI, Pitt bacteraemia score, were independently associated with mortality, while appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy and administration of antibiotic therapy within the first hour from infection's recognition were associated with better prognosis. Conclusion: qSOFA as compared to other severity scores showed an excellent negative predictive value. Better prognosis was associated with administration of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy and its timely initiation.
Critical Care Medicine, 2011
S evere sepsis, defined as sepsis associated with acute organ dysfunction, remains a leading cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, healthcare costs, workload, and death with mortality rates ranging from 30% to 50% despite advances in critical care management (1). Severe sep-sis has a broad spectrum of clinical presentations. This clinical diversity may contribute to explain why the treatments evaluated in randomized controlled trials have not produced unequivocal evidence of efficacy.
Tropical Medicine & International Health
objective To assess the true association between appropriate prescription of antibiotics and prognosis in patients with sepsis, a key issue in health care and quality improvement strategies. methods Prospective cohort study in three university hospitals to determine whether the empirical prescription of antibiotics was adequate or inadequate, and to compare hospital death rates and length of stay according to different classifications of antibiotics prescription. Logistic regression models for risk estimation were fitted. results A total of 705 patients with severe sepsis were included. No differences were found in positive-culture patients (n = 545) regarding the risk of death with insufficient spectrum antibiotics, compared to patients who received adequate spectrum antibiotics (OR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.55-1.48). Delay in initiating antibiotics was not associated with the risk of death in patients with adequate spectrum of antibiotics, either with positive (OR = 1.04; 95% CI = 0.99-1.08) or negative cultures (OR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.92-1.04). There were no differences in the length of hospital stay, according to the antibiotic prescription (median 11 days, IQR = 7-18 days for the whole cohort). conclusions No associations were found between inadequate antibiotic prescription or delay to initiate therapy and mortality or length of stay.
The American Journal of Medicine, 2006
We evaluated the effect of inappropriate antibiotic treatment on mortality and duration of hospital stay in medical inpatients with bacterial infections. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two cohorts of febrile adult patients (excluding patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome and organ transplant recipients), hospitalized in three medical centers in Israel, Italy, and Germany, were included. Patients' data were collected prospectively. Initial empirical treatment was defined as appropriate if an antibiotic prescribed within 24 hours of the first encounter with the patient matched the in vitro susceptibility of a pathogen deemed to be the likely cause of infection. The results of cultures and serologic or direct tests, and data on outcomes were collected 30 days after initiation of empirical treatment. RESULTS: A total of 920 patients (26% of 3529 included patients) had microbiologically documented infections, and mortality data were available for 895 patients (97%). Inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment was prescribed in 36% of patients (N ϭ 319). All-cause 30-day mortality rates were 20.1% (N ϭ 64) and 11.8% (N ϭ 68) in patients who received inappropriate and appropriate treatment, respectively (odds ratio ϭ 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-2.72, P ϭ .001). When adjustment was made for medical center and other variables, the association between inappropriate with mortality was significant (odds ratio ϭ 1.58, 95% CI, 0.99-2.54, P ϭ .058). In all 3 medical centers, the mean duration of hospital stay was at least 2 days longer for patients who were prescribed inappropriate antibiotic treatment (overall P ϭ .002). This association was consistent after adjusting for other variables (P ϭ .006). CONCLUSION: Appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment is associated with a better survival and shortened duration of hospital stay in medical patients with bacterial infections.
Background: Management of cardiac intensive care unit (ICU) sepsis is complicated by the high incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, which mimics sepsis but without an infective cause. This pilot randomised trial investigated whether or not, in the ICU, 48 hours of broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment was adequate to safely treat suspected sepsis of unknown and unproven origin and also the predictive power of newer biomarkers of sepsis. Objective: The main objective of this pilot study was to provide preliminary data on the likely safety and efficacy of a reduced course of antibiotics for the treatment of ICU infections of unknown origin. Design: A pilot, single-centre, open-label randomised trial. Setting: This study was carried out in the ICU of a tertiary heart and chest hospital. Participants: Patients being treated within the ICU were recruited into the trial if the intensivist was planning to commence antibiotics because of evidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and a strong suspicion of infection but there was no actual known source for that infection. Interventions: Broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment administered for 48 hours (experimental) compared with treatment for 7 days (control). Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was a composite outcome of the rate of death or initiation of antibiotic therapy after the completion of the treatment schedule allocated at randomisation. Secondary outcomes included the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU and hospital stay; the incidence of infection with Clostridium difficile (B. S. Weeks & E. Alcamo) Jones & Bartlett International Publishers, 2008, or methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (B. S. Weeks & E. Alcamo) Jones & Bartlett International Publishers, 2008; resource utilisation and costs associated with each of the two pilot arms; the ratio of patients screened to patients eligible to patients randomised; the incidence of crossover between groups; and the significance of newer biomarkers for sepsis for predicting patients’ need for further antibiotics. Results: A total of 46 patients were recruited into the trial, with 23 randomised to each group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the composite primary outcome measure. The risk difference was 0.12 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11 to 0.13; p = 0.3]. In the 2-day group, four patients (17.4%) required further antibiotics compared with three (13%) in the 7-day group. Four patients died within the trial period and the deaths were not trial related. Patients who died during the trial period received no additional antibiotics in excess of their trial allocation. There were no documented incidences of MRSA or C. difficile infection in either group. No significant differences in adverse events were observed between the groups. Key economic findings were mean antibiotic costs per patient of £168.97 for the 2-day group and £375.86 for the 7-day group. The potential per annum cost saving for the ICU of 2-day treatment was estimated to range from £108,140 to £126,060. Patient screening was considered the biggest barrier to recruitment. There was no crossover between the two randomised groups. Data verification ascertained > 98% accuracy in data collection. Baseline procalcitonin was found to be predictive of the composite outcome (death and needing further antibiotics) (odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.67; p = 0.005). Analysis of baseline procalcitonin also indicated a trend towards it being a predictor of restarting antibiotics, with an odds ratio of 1.45 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.02; p = 0.01). Conclusions: Data from this pilot study suggest that there could be significant benefits of reducing broad-spectrum antibiotic use in the ICU without it undermining patient safety, with a potential cost saving in our unit of over £100,000 per year. Evidence from this pilot trial is not definitive but warrants further investigation using a large randomised controlled trial. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN82694288. Funding: This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
Journal of critical care, 2018
To estimate the effect of each of the EGDT components, as well as of the antibiotics, on length-of-stay and mortality. Prospective cohort in three hospitals. Adult patients admitted by the Emergency Rooms (ER) with infection and any of systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or lactate >4 mmol/L. An instrumental analysis with hospital of admission as the instrumental variable was performed to estimate the effect of each intervention on hospital mortality and secondary outcomes. Among 2587 patients evaluated 884 met inclusion criteria, with a hospital mortality rate of 17% (n = 150). In the instrumental analysis, the only intervention associated with an absolute reduction in mortality (21%) was the use of antibiotics in the first 3 h. In patients with lactate values ≥4 mmol/L in the ER, a non-decrease of at least 10% at six hours was independently associated with mortality (OR = 3.1; 95%CI = 1.5-6.2). Among patients entering ER with infection and shock or hypoperfusion criteria, the ...
BMC Anesthesiology, 2014
Background: Factors capable of impacting hospital mortality in patients with septic shock remain uncertain. Our objective was to identify predictors of hospital mortality among patients who received appropriate antimicrobial therapy for bacteremic septic shock after accounting for severity of illness, resuscitation status, and processes of care. Methods: We conducted a secondary subgroup analysis of a prospective severe sepsis cohort study. Patients with septic shock and positive blood cultures who received appropriate antimicrobial therapy were included. Univariable analyses were used to identify differences between hospital survivors and non-survivors, and a multivariable logistic regression model revealed independent determinants of hospital mortality.
Association between source of infection and hospital mortality in patients who have septic shock
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014
Rationale: Mortality caused by septic shock may be determined by a systemic inflammatory response, independent of the inciting infection, but it may also be influenced by the anatomic source of infection. Objectives: To determine the association between the anatomic source of infection and hospital mortality in critically ill patients who have septic shock. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of 7,974 patients who had septic shock in 29 academic and community intensive care units in Canada, the United States, and Saudi Arabia from January 1989 to May 2008. Measurements and Main Results: Subjects were assigned 1 of 20 anatomic sources of infection based on clinical diagnosis and/or isolation of pathogens. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Overall crude hospital mortality was 52% (21-85% across sources of infection). Variation in mortality remained after adjusting for year of admission, geographic source of admission, age, sex, comorbidities, community-versus hospital-acquired infection, and organism type. The source of infection with the highest standardized hospital mortality was ischemic bowel (75%); the lowest was obstructive uropathy-associated urinary tract infection (26%). Residual variation in adjusted hospital mortality was not explained by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, number of Day 1 organ failures, bacteremia, appropriateness of empiric antimicrobials, or adjunct therapies. In patients who received appropriate antimicrobials after onset of hypotension, source of infection was associated with death after adjustment for both predisposing and downstream factors. Conclusions: Anatomic source of infection should be considered in future trial designs and analyses, and in development of prognostic scoring systems.
European Journal of Internal Medicine, 2019
Background: Sepsis has been associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aims were to determine predictors of mortality among patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) and to ascertain the role of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) in predicting poor outcomes. Methods: All internal medicine patients with BSIs at the Hospital of Jura, Switzerland during a three year period (July 2014 to June 2017) were included. Results: Among 404 BSIs, Escherichia coli represented the most common species isolated (156 episodes; 38.6%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (68; 16.8%). The most common site of infection was urinary tract accounting for 39.6% of BSIs (160 episodes). Thirty-day mortality was 18.1%. Multivariate analysis revealed BSI due to staphylococci, malignancy (haematologic or solid organ), qSOFA≥2 points, Pitt bacteraemia score as independent predictors of mortality, while appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy and administration of antibiotic therapy within three hours from infection's recognition were identified as a predictor of good prognosis. qSOFA showed the highest sensitivity (87.7%), negative predictive value (96.6%) and accuracy (0.83) as compared to other scores. Mortality among 141 septic patients was 45.4%. Malignancy (haematologic or solid organ), primary BSI, Pitt bacteraemia score, were independently associated with mortality, while appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy and administration of antibiotic therapy within the first hour from infection's recognition were associated with better prognosis. Conclusion: qSOFA as compared to other severity scores showed an excellent negative predictive value. Better prognosis was associated with administration of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy and its timely initiation.