Ao grande cientista Otto Richard Gottlieb, um pequeno ensaio de despedida (original) (raw)
Related papers
vorgelegt am Fachbereich 2 (Biologie/Chemie) der Universität Bremen
2014
iii ivto the commonality of humankind and to those who not forget it v viAcknowledgements I want to thank all people that contributed to the successful completion of this work. Primarily and in first place I have to thank Matthias Wolff who not only helped to finish this project but also contributed a great deal that it took off. In Peru I want to thank all colleagues and friends at IMARPE that welcomed me in the first place and helped me ever
Review: \u27Alexander von Humboldt und die Pharmazie\u27
1989
During the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, when generalists rather than specialists and individuals rather than organizations dominated the course of scientific development, German naturalist Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859) stood out as a leading figure in such diverse yet interrelated fields as geography, geology, botany, medicine, and pharmacy. And despite the massive body of historical writings on Humboldt, little is known concerning his contributions to pharmacy and his relationship to the discipline\u27s practitioners. Wolfgang-Hagen Hein ably fills this void in scholarship with his well-researched Alexander von Humboldt und die Pharmazie. The significance of this topic to the history of science should not be underestimated, since during Humboldt\u27s lifetime pharmacy not only was transformed in terms of new knowledge concerning both inorganic compounds and organic natural products, but also because as a discipline it was an important source of manpower for ...
Biochemistry at the early 20th century: the main contributors
Archives of the Balkan Medical Union, 2020
La biochimie au début du 20-ème siècle : les principaux contributeurs La biochimie ou la chimie biologique est la science qui étudie tous les processus chimiques qui se déroulent dans l'organisme vivant de l'homme, des animaux, des protozoaires et des plantes. Dans notre article, nous révélons la contribution des scientifiques éminents à ce domaine au début du vingtième siècle, retraçant également les premières étapes du développement scientifique de la biochimie.
Intellectual Traditions in the Life Sciences: Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1982
Biological science is a vibrant, collective human endeavor consisting largely of controlled experiments and their critical interpretations. This does not, however, constitute an exhaustive catalog of the component parts of the life sciences. Another element is the context in which these experiments are integrated [I]. I am not speaking here of Kuhnian paradigms or of heuristic constructs, but of intellectual traditions which are not proved or disproved by experiment and which, of themselves, rarely suggest new investigations.1 Nevertheless, these intellectual traditions subtly guide the direction of the entire enterprise of biology. Most analyses of the intellectual traditions in biology have focused on the integration of biological sciences into the larger intellectual ferments of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. This essay, however, will attempt to look at the intellectual currents which led to the separation of molecular biology and biochemistry during die mid-twentieth century. Both of diese disciplines attempt to understand die physical basis of life; yet molecular biology was founded by scientists who not only were untrained in biochemistry but were antagonistic to it. In particular, one of the most influential founders of molecular biology, Max Delbrück, "deprecated biochemistry," claiming that the analysis of the cell by biochemists had "stalled around in a semidescriptive manner without noticeably progressing towards a radical physical explanation" [2, p. 22]. This bias was transmitted to several of his students and colleagues. Replying in unkind, the famed nucleic acid biochemist Erwin Chargaff has This paper was submitted in the first Dwight J. Ingle Memorial Young Writers' competition for authors under 35.
Turkish Journal of Biochemistry, 2015
Escaping from the chaotic environment of Germany before World War II, several scientists, some of whom were biochemists, took refuge in Turkey and made huge contributions in the preparations of new university reforms beginning in 1933. During this period, three wellknown biochemistry scholars, Werner Lipschitz, Felix Haurowitz and Zdenko Stary were accepted into the Biochemistry Institute of Istanbul University, and each one of these scientists became the head of this institute respectively. Being at the zenith of their careers, these three scientists spent their most prolific years in the Biochemistry Institute. The first biochemist taking charge of the reforms, Werner Lipschitz, established a fully equipped laboratory during his term in his own right and with the support of some officials. During his stint, he published several articles and a biochemistry book. However, Lipschitz had to challenge some difficulties such as learning Turkish and finding qualified Turkish assistants. ...