THREATS TO BRAZILIAN DEMOCRACY: POLITIZATION OF THE ARMED FORCES AND THE RISKS TO THE DEMOCRATIC STATE (Atena Editora) (original) (raw)
Related papers
Militarization of Politics in Brazil
The article provides analyses of the recent events in Brazil that culminated in a movement that I call " militarization of politics ". Changes in military jurisdiction, political speeches by members of the Armed Forces, a " federal interference " commanded by militaries in the State of Rio de Janeiro, the fulfillment of the traditional civilian offices in federal government (as the Ministry of Defense), parallel to the absence of criminal responsibility for crimes against humanity during the dictatorship of 1964-1985, paved the way for poor results in terms of public security and a growing peril for the Constitutional Democratic State designed by the Constitution of 1988.
Military involvement in political disputesas a factor of institutional instability in Brazil
Brasiliana: Journal for Brazilian Studies
This paper reports how the recent military`s involvement in political disputes raises instability in Brazil. As the country will have a presidential election in October 2022, the research sheds light on how President Bolsonaro abuses the armed forces` prestige and power as an instrument of intimidation and political pressure, which includes pushing followers to call for military intervention against Congress and the Supreme Court. For this purpose, this study identifies some top military officials’ declarations and analyses how they explain Brazil’s political instability scenario that began in 2013 and how the other two Branches have been reacting to Bolsonaro`s moves. Despite no evidence that the armed forces are committed to any threat to democracy, it must be a permanent task to keep them as nonpartisan institutions. Shielding military commanders from domestic politics is part of this effort to be considered in the studies about the protection of the constitutional order.
Back to basics: assessing military involvement in politics in contemporary Brazil
Brasiliana: Journal for Brazilian Studies, 2021
As Brazil showed signs of progress in civil-military relations in the late nineties and early 2000s, research moved from civilian control to defense policy topics, resulting in the neglect of less obvious forms of military involvement in politics, many of which pre-date the presidency of Jair Bolsonaro. After critically reviewing existing frameworks for assessing progress in civilian control we propose returning to the field's primary concern with military intervention in politics by using three indicators-military presence in government; public commentary by military officers; and episodes of military contestation-and their implications regarding the armed forces, politicians, and society. Next, we examine these three indicators in the context of the presidencies of Dilma Rousseff and Michel Temer. We conclude that interactions between "soldiers, politicians, and civilians" in recent episodes of military involvement in politics reveal the full extent of the frailty of civil-military relations in Brazil.
Armed forces and internal security: reflections on civil-military relations in brazil
Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas Avançadas do Terceiro Setor, 2019
This article aims to reflect about the possible implications of the use of the Armed Forces in internal security activities on civil-military relations in Brazil. From the Proclamation of the Republic, in 1989, this fraction occupied a prominent position in the national scenario, whose course, until 1964, was characterized by an interventionist function, imbued with messianic spirit and protagonism in the development of Brazilian institutions, configuring a model of intercurrence that had the characteristics of the civilian subjective control as formulated by Samuel P. Huntington in The Soldier and the State. However, on the basis of academic argumentation in recent research by which there was a process aimed at distancing the military from political participation, in its internal individual aspect and in collusion with political parties, radical organizations or social movements, it was admitted that, after 1985, there was a rupture with the previous trajectory, approaching the barracks of the civilian objective control, lineate in same work of that cited author, which, however, may be being hampered in its external institutional side, due to the significant increasing in the use of the armed segment in
Militarisation by Popular Demand? Explaining the Politics of Internal Military Roles in Brazil
Bulletin of Latin American Research, 2021
Why are Latin American politicians drawing the armed forces into politics and public security? What consequences does this democratically controlled re-militarisation have for civil-military relations? With a case study of Brazil, this article introduces the conceptual tool of 'negative convergence': a widespread acceptance of increasing the military's internal roles among political leaders, military elites and society. Drawing upon public opinion surveys, the article analyses the 'demand' for internal military roles. A qualitative analysis of secondary literature and news reports then analyses the 'supply-side' of negative convergence: political leaders' willingness to increase the armed forces' internal roles and the military's reactions.
O presente artigo, resultado de investigações e discussões teóricas realizadas no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito e no Centro para Cidadania, Sociedade Civil e Estado Democrático de Direito (CISRUL) da Universidade de Aberdeen no Reino Unido, tem como escopo principal analisar o processo histórico e sócio-político brasileiro de transformações de direitos humanos durante a saída do país do domínio autoritário militar e sua chegada à democracia constitucional, sob a perspectiva da teoria do modelo espiral de mudança de direitos humanos (spiral model) desenvolvida por Risse, Ropp and Sikkink (2013; 1999). Além disso, com base no conceito de autoritarismo social desenvolvido por Dagnino (2014; 2000; 1998; 1993), o artigo explica porque apesar de o Brasil ter se transformado em uma democracia constitucional, há ainda um cenário generalizado de violações de direitos humanos no país. Por fim, o artigo argui pela necessidade de se mudar as bases materiais da sociedade brasileira, de forma a possibilitar a construção de um novo projeto de sociedade, mais igualitária e na qual haja a efetivação dos direitos humanos. Palavras-chave: Direitos Humanos; Democracia; Teoria de Mudança de Direitos Humanos em Espiral (Spiral Model); Autoritarismo Social. The paper, the result of research and theoretical discussions in the Postgraduate Program in Law and the Centre for Citizenship, Civil Society and Rule of Law (CISRUL) of the University of Aberdeen in the UK, has as main purpose to analyse the Brazilian historical and socio-political process of human rights developments during the output of the country's military authoritarian rule and its arrival at a constitutional democracy from the perspective of the spiral model of human rights change theory developed by Risse, Ropp and Sikkink (2013; 1999). In addition, based on the concept of social authoritarianism developed by Dagnino (2014; 2000; 1998; 1993), the paper explains why even though Brazil has been transformed into a constitutional democracy, there is still a widespread scenario of human rights violations. Finally, the paper let us reason together by the need to change the material basis of Brazilian society, in order to enable the construction of a new project of society, more egalitarian and where there is the realization of human rights. Key-words: Human Rights; Democracy; Spiral Model of Human Rights Change. Social Authoritarianism
Military intervention in brazil: pinnacle, disruption and decline
Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas Avançadas do Terceiro Setor
Brazil until the establishment of the Civil and Military Regime of March 31, 1964 coexisted with military coups, which ravaged the entire republican period and contributed to corrupt any democratic pretension of the nation. This article aims to examine the process that would have sought to withdraw the armed segment from political activity after that date, by means of an analysis of the course of political and strategic actions that led to a rupture with the previous paradigm and changes in civil and military relations and in the Brazilian democracy. In the theoretical and methodological framework, the argumentation, based on a hypothetical deductive approach, was supported by a dialectical path assumption, taking as a starting point the Moderator Model of Alfred Stepan, to which put an opposing configuration structure, so called Enframement Antimodel, which supposedly would result in a form of very close relationship with that proposed by Samuel Phillips Huntington, named Civilian ...
“For the guarantee of law and order”: The armed forces and public security in Brazil
Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI) Working Paper, 2014
The transition to democracy in Brazil came with a significant change in the role the armed forces could play for public security within the country. According to article 142 of the 1988 constitution, the armed forces could now intervene “for the guarantee of law and order” in Brazil only on the initiative of the civilian authorities. But since then, the military has been used on this basis in a growing array of situations, ranging from strikes and elections via political summits and visits by foreign dignitaries to efforts to “pacify” urban neighbourhoods. This paper examines how the constitutional mandate of the armed forces to guarantee law and order was specified in successive legislation in Brazil, and how the practice of deploying troops for policing purposes has evolved. It finds that the growing use of the military for the guarantee of law and order, while not necessarily weakening civilian control of the armed forces, still comes with significant risks for the quality of democracy. The main risk is associated with how this use of the military shapes state-society relations and may weaken the links between the elected leaders and those they represent.
Brasiliana: Journal for Brazilian Studies, 2021
This article addresses the immediate aftermath of the November 15, 1889, republican coup d’état in Brazil. Taking into account the diversity of the states’ political landscapes, its main theme is the profound transformation in the country’s political life precipitated by the abrupt passage from a parliamentary monarchy, marked by the ascendancy of civilian institutions, to a military dictatorship. It will demonstrate that, given the fact that republicans were a fragmented minority in most of the country, the military had preeminence in the implementation of the regime. However, considering that the coup was itself an act of insubordination, that control over institutions created frictions, and that the role of arbiters contaminated the barracks with the period’s extreme polarization, the liabilities of the militarization of politics were soon manifest. They were, most notably, the deep unrest and factionalism in the armed forces, the continuous institutional degradation, and the rise of authoritarianism.