Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State (original) (raw)
Related papers
Democracy and Global Governance. The Internal and External Levers
The paper explores the methods to introduce democratic devices in global governance. The first part makes an attempt to define what a democratic deficit is. The second part provides some benchmark to identify when and how international organizations, the most important and visible part of global governance, correspond to the values of democracy. The third part presents the internal and the external levers. The internal lever is defined as the ways in which democratization within countries helps to foster more transparent, accountable and participatory forms of global governance. The external lever is defined as the ways in which international organizations contribute to promote democratic transition and consolidation in their members. Neither the internal nor the external levers work effectively if they are left to inter-governmental bargaining only. An active participation of non-governmental actors is needed in order to make them effective. The paper finally discuss a list of proposals to democratize global governance.
Democracy and Global Governance
The Oxford Handbook of International Political Theory, 2018
Is it feasible to democratize the powerful institutions of global governance that currently work to advance globalization processes, making them more responsive to the needs and interests of the people affected by their policies? This chapter discusses the motivation for addressing this “democratic deficit” at the transnational level, in the context of the inequalities in power and resources engendered by globalization and its institutional framework. It critically analyses two main lines of argument put forward for democratization of global governance—the “all subjected” and the “all affected” principles—and then proposes a reformulation of them for this new context. It concludes by considering some concrete directions for fulfilling democratic norms transnationally, including ways of introducing greater transparency and accountability in transnational institutions, as well as more extensive changes that would enable people to gain substantial control over the forces and structures...
Globalization and Democratization: Institutional Design for Global Institutions
Journal of Social Philosophy, 2006
This paper is concerned with the best way to conceptualize democracy for supranational and transnational institutions. In this paper, I assume, without examining the evidence, the veracity of the often-repeated argument that there is an increasing need for transnational and supranational institutions in the new global context; and consider, in that context, the type of democratic legitimacy that might attach to such institutions. 2 This latter focus represents a departure from some current cosmopolitan theorizing about such global institutions, which offer a justice-based account of their legitimacy, viz., where global institutions are justified if they bring about a fairer world 3 . I then attempt to sketch the sort of account that would be necessary to create democratic and accountable global institutions.
Mural Internacional, 2020
This article aims to present a complex literature review of recent studies on the role of international institutions in democracy promotion. The articles analyzed were selected through a previous bibliometric study conducted on the Web of Science platform. Based on the considerations obtained through the literature raised, the main gaps and contradictions in the studies in question were identified, suggesting at the end a research agenda for future works.
Democracy in global governance: The promises and pitfalls of transnational actors
Global Governance, 2010
The participation of transnational actors in global policymaking is increasingly seen as a means to democratize global governance. Drawing on alternative theories of democracy and existing empirical evidence, we assess the promises and pitfalls of this vision. We explore how the structuring and operation of international institutions, public-private partnerships, and transnational actors themselves may facilitate expanded participation and enhanced accountability in global governance. We find considerable support for an optimistic verdict on the democratizing potential of transnational actor involvement, but also identify hurdles in democratic theory and the practice of global governance that motivate a more cautious outlook. In conclusion, we call for research that explores the conditions for democracy in global governance through a combination of normative political theory and positive empirical research.
Can International Organisations Be Democratic? A Reassessment
Contexto Internacional, 2019
This article makes the case for viewing international organisations (IOs) as global pol-yarchies. Our argument is twofold: on a theoretical level, IOs often meet the criterion of philosophical coherence, as they are based on rules of membership and decision-making that are compatible with those found in democratic institutions. On a practical level, we believe the concerns of IOs about pluralism, inclusiveness and efficacy go far beyond rhetoric, and may decisively influence their activities as well as their outcomes. To this end, the first section explores Robert Dahl's concept of polyarchy and applies this to global institutions. In the subsequent sections, we advance our empirical argument with the UN as a case study. We reach three main conclusions. The first is that, at the bureaucratic level, the UN Secretariat performs some typically democratic functions, such as multilateral representation and the constitution of international regimes, which turns it into an important channel for feasible democracy in international politics. Second, at the multilateral level, the UN General Assembly (UNGA) represents a specific kind of representative polyarchy by allowing the greatest possible number of countries to have an equal say in global affairs. And third, it also serves as a gateway for multilevelled international representation by including a diversity of non-state actors in what has been called the 'Third United Nations. '
The Democratic Deficit in Global Governance
This paper will answer the question of whether there is a democratic deficit in global governance, using models of democracy, post-colonial theory notions, as well as case studies to explain it. There is a democratic deficit (deficit) in global governance. This deficit is seen through various spheres in theory and practice. The voting disparity in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, and the veto powers that the P-5 possess in the United Nations Security Council clearly demonstrates the need for a more democratic approach. Transnational civil society's (TCS) western centrism and imperial-like practices also affects democratic decision-making. To show the deficit is important to present an overview of two notions which will frame the grounding of the arguments put forward. The first is an overview of the models of democracy, and the second is imperialism, which stems from post-colonial theory.
The Internal and External Levers to Achieve Global Democracy
Global Policy, 2017
The paper explores the methods to introduce democratic devices in global governance. The first part makes an attempt to define what democratic global governance is and what its aims are. The second part provides some benchmark to identify when and how international organizations, the most important and visible part of global governance, correspond to the values of democracy. The third part presents what we label the internal and the external levers. The internal lever is defined as the ways in which democratization within countries helps to foster more transparent, accountable and participatory forms of global governance. The external lever is defined as the ways in which international organizations contribute to promote democratic transition and consolidation in their members. Neither the internal nor the external levers work effectively if they are left to intergovernmental bargaining only. An active participation of non-governmental actors is needed in order to make them effective. The paper finally discusses a list of proposals to democratize global governance.