Controversy over Language: Towards Pre-Qin Semiotics (original) (raw)
Related papers
Introduction: Semiotics and history revisited
The introductory article offers a general frame for the special issue of Sign Systems Studies, discussing the emergence of semiotics of history as a new discipline or approach in the humanities. It presents an overview on the attempts of joining the history and semiotics in the Western world since the early 1980s, with a special focus on the United States, and examines the contribution of the Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics to the semiotic study of history, paying the main attention to the work of Juri Lotman and Boris Uspenskij. Finally, a survey of the articles that make up the special issue dedicated to the 80th anniversary of Boris Uspenskij is presented.
Chinese Semiotic Studies 12(3): 407-413 Semiotic Anima(l
This review argues that the notion of the semiotic animal as the most characteristic one for human activity has a long and disputable history, not in Deely's writings only but in philosophy in general. The idea of the three coauthors of the book under review, taken from "the air", ripens and expands with unexpected meaning with respect to its origin, appropriateness, and ongoing novelty. The strongest argument for coining the new definition was found by Deely in Peirce's semiosis and in Poinsot's way of sign, a road that had not been taken in the history of knowledge.
Forgetting history is a social phenomenon that contradicts the ideal of a living commemorative culture. Historical knowledge is quickly forgotten by many students, yet the younger generations in particular are confronted with numerous discourses on history that are determined by a shift to the right. This essay explores possible synergies for history education in semiotics and attempts to develop an epistemology that would be methodologically meaningful in the theory of education in history.
2013 - The Semiotic Ideology of Semiotics - A Vertiginous Reading
This commentary dwells on the intellectual, methodological, and stylistic characteristics that constitute the novelty of Robert Yelle's approach to the semiotics of religion. While praising Yelle's refreshing approach and his ability to combine a semiotic mindset with accurate comparative perspective, deep contextual knowledge, and historical sensibility, the commentary raises the issue of the extent to which semioticians can, and should, acknowledge the transient, historical nature of their point of view. This acknowledgment, it is argued, does not necessarily result in a self-deconstruction of the semiotic method itself but in the somewhat paradoxical awareness of the semiotic ideology underpinning it.
Semiotics Today: An Introduction
2012
When the Managing Editors of this journal asked us to undertake this special issue on the position of semiotics in the vast domain of contemporary cultural studies, we accepted with great pleasure, given our personal involvement with structuralism and semiotics during nearly half a century. While we ourselves work within the tradition of semiotics defined by Ferdinand de Saussure in the early years of the 20 century as the study of how sign systems function in the life of society, we did not limit the scope of this volume to classical Saussurean semiotics (or semiology, as it is also known). In our Call for papers we asked for submissions “on all aspects of semiotics, focusing on analysis informed by a reflexive theoretical and methodological awareness” and it is our hope that readers will find these qualities in the papers selected. It has become something of a ritual in introductory courses, handbooks and papers on semiotics to pay respects to the two founders of the discipline, F...
SHORT COURSE of GENERAL SEMIOTICS, 2022
My first book on semiotics was published in Moscow in 1992; it was called "Language as a Sign System". After that, I wrote and published many books and articles, trying to understand the intricacies of semiotics and highlight its main characteristics. Over time, some of my views have undergone metamorphoses, and I have adjusted my earlier statements to express new formulations. Now, on the threshold of my 95th birthday, I want to sum up my vacillations and doubts in a short concluding essay, which seems to me worthy of attention. Whether this is really so, is for the readers to judge. I want to say a few words about what general semiotics means. De facto, semiotics originated in ancient Greece and Rome − no science or craft can exist without its own signs. But only at the end of the 19th century did a movement arise for the creation of semiotics that would formulate general principles for all branches of this science. In contrast to particular semiotics, such science can be called general semiotics.
Semiotica, 2020
In this study I compare the work of two scholars who are important for contemporary research into the history of semiotics. The main goal of the study is to describe specific rhetorical/figurative forms and structures of persuasion between two epistemological positions that determine various possibilities in the historiography of semiotics. The main question is this: how do we understand two important metatheoretical forms of descriptions in the historiography of semiotics or the history of sign relations? The first perspective is semiology and its corollary, “structuralism,” as presented in Michel Foucault’sThe Order of Things. This perspective prefers to consider history as a set of ruptures (i). The second position explores the possibility of the historical development of semiotic consciousness as presented in the works of John N. Deely (ii). The main aim of this study lies in the exploration of these two different epistemological bases – divergent bases for developing specific u...
Semiotics in History and Archaeology
Jamin Pelkey, Susan Petrilli and Sophia Melanson Ricciardone (eds.), Bloomsbury Semiotics. Vol. 3: Semiotics in the Arts and Social Sciences. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022
Semiotics has enjoyed a limited, but enduring interest in history and archaeology. Projects like ‘semiotics of history’, ‘historical semiotics’, ‘historia sub specie semioticae’, ‘semiotics of archaeology’, ‘archaeology of semiotics’ and ‘archaeological semiotics’ have been proclaimed periodically since the heyday of semiotics in the 1970s. Although never a dominant focus, semiotic approaches have opened many important new theoretical vistas and produced some important empirical studies in history and archaeology and their potential is definitely not yet exhausted. This chapter provides a short history of joining semiotics to historical and archaeological research featuring separately Saussurean and Peircean perspectives. We shall present some major achievements and discussions in historical and archaeological semiotics, primarily in theoretical, but also in empirical terms, and describe some key questions and research perspectives for the future of semiotics in these two fields. But first, we will offer a general framework for the semiotic analysis of past societies.