Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Advancements in Minimally Invasive Treatment of Colorectal Pathologies (original) (raw)

Abstract

Colorectal surgery has witnessed a significant transformation with the advent of laparoscopic techniques, offering numerous benefits over traditional open procedures. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is now widely recognized for its advantages, including reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery. This abstract provides an overview of the key aspects of laparoscopic colorectal surgery, encompassing patient selection, surgical techniques, outcomes, and recent advancements. Patient selection is a pivotal factor in achieving successful outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The abstract discusses criteria for selecting appropriate candidates, taking into account factors such as the type and stage of colorectal pathology, patient comorbidities, and surgeon expertise. It underscores the importance of individualized treatment plans and comprehensive preoperative evaluation. The surgical techniques employed in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, including colectomy, rectal resection, and lymph node dissection, are detailed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the procedure. The abstract highlights the benefits of laparoscopy, such as smaller incisions, minimized risk of wound complications, and faster return to normal activities. Clinical outcomes associated with laparoscopic colorectal surgery are also discussed, focusing on reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and excellent oncologic outcomes. Potential complications and their management are addressed, emphasizing the significance of surgical expertise in minimizing adverse events. Furthermore, recent advancements in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, such as enhanced imaging modalities, minimally invasive approaches to rectal cancer, and the use of robotic-assisted systems, are highlighted. These innovations have contributed to enhancing the precision and success rates of the procedure while minimizing potential risks. In conclusion, laparoscopic colorectal surgery has emerged as a highly effective and minimally invasive approach to treat a range of colorectal pathologies. This abstract provides an overview of the key aspects and recent advancements in this field, underlining its potential to significantly improve patient outcomes and the overall experience of individuals undergoing colorectal surgery.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (53)

  1. Anderson J, Luchtefeld M, Dujovny N, Hoedema R, Kim D, Butcher J. A comparison of laparoscopic, hand-assist and open sigmoid resection in the treatment of diverticular disease. Am J Surg. 2007;193(3):400-3.
  2. Bartels SA, DʼHoore A, Cuesta MA, Bensdorp AJ, Lucas C, Bemelman WA . Significantly increased pregnancy rates after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a cross-sectional study. Ann Surg. 2012;256:1045.
  3. Belizon A, Balik E, Feingold DL, Bessler M, Arnell TD, Forde KA, et al. Major abdominal surgery increases plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor: open more so than minimally invasive methods. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):792-8.
  4. Bender JS, Magnuson TH, Zenilman ME, Smith-Meek MM, Ratner LE, Jones CE, et al. Outcome following colon surgery in the octogenarian. Am Surg. 1996;62(4):276-9.
  5. Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF. Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet. 1994; 344(8914):58.
  6. Chang YJ, Marcello PW, Rusin C, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ. Hand- assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: helping hand or hindrance? Surg Endosc. 2005;19(5):656-61.
  7. Dean PA, Beart RWJr, Nelson H, Elftmann TD, Schlinkert RT. Laparoscopic-assisted segmental colectomy: early Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994;69(9):834-40.
  8. Djokovic JL, Hedley-Whyte J. Prediction of outcome of surgery and anaesthesia in patients over 80. JAMA. 1979; 242(21):2301-6.
  9. Döbrönte Z, Wittmann T, Karácsony G. Rapid development of malignant metastases in the abdominal wall after laparoscopy. Endoscopy. 1978;10(2):127-30.
  10. Falk PM, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(1):28-34.
  11. Fallahzadeh H, Mays ET. Preexisting disease as a predictor of the outcome of colectomy. Am J Surg. 1991;162(5):497-8.
  12. Fleshman JW, Fry RD, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ. Laparoscopic- assisted and minilaparotomy approaches to colorectal diseases are similar in early outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(1):15-22.
  13. Franklin ME, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D, Dorman JP, Glass JL, Norem R, et al. Prospective comparison of open vs laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma. Five-year results. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(10 Suppl):S35-46.
  14. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Okeson GC, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, et al. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A comparison of postoperative pulmonary function. Ann Surg. 1991;213(6):651-3.
  15. Gellman L, Salky B, Edye M. Laparoscopic assisted colectomy. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:1041-4.
  16. Goh YC, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Early postoperative results of a prospective series of laparoscopic vs. open anterior resections for rectosigmoid cancers. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:776-80.
  17. Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, Kitajima M. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(4):636-40.
  18. Hoffman GC, Baker JW, Fitchett CW, Vansant JH. Laparo scopic- assisted colectomy. Initial experience. Ann Surg. 1994;219:732-40.
  19. Hughes ESR, McDermott FT, Polglase AL, Johnson WR. Tumor recurrence in the abdominal wall scar after large-bowel cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983;26(9):571-2.
  20. Keats AS. The ASA classification of physical status-a recapitulation. Anesthesiology. 1978;49:233-6.
  21. Khalili TM, Fleshner PR, Hiatt JR, Sokol TP, Manookian C, Tsushima G, et al. Colorectal cancer: comparison of laparoscopic with open approaches. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(7):832-8.
  22. Kirman I, Cekic V, Poltoratskaia N, Sylla P, Jain S, Forde KA, et al. Open surgery induces a dramatic decrease in circulating intact IGFBP-3 in patients with colorectal cancer not seen with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(1):55-9.
  23. Kranczer S. Banner year for US longevity. Star Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1998;79:8-14.
  24. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9325):2224-9.
  25. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Pique JM, Delgado S, Campo E, Bordas JM, et al. Short-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc. 1995;9(10):1101-5.
  26. Lange MM, Marijnen CA, Maas CP, Putter H, Rutten HJ, Stiggelbout AM, et al. Risk factors for sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45:1578.
  27. Lechaux D, Trebuchet G, Le Calve JL. Five-year results of 206 laparoscopic left colectomies for cancer. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(10):1409-12.
  28. Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R. Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverti- culitis. Outcome and costs. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:15-8.
  29. Lord SA, Larach SW, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Lago CP, Lube MW. Laparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinoma: a three- year experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:148-54.
  30. Loungnarath R, Fleshman JW. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy techniques. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2003;10(4): 219-30.
  31. Lumley JW, Fielding GA, Rhodes M, Nathanson LK, Siu S, Stitz RW. Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: lessons learned from 240 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:155-9.
  32. Masui H, Ike H, Yamaguchi S, et al. Male sexual function after autonomic nerve-preserving operation for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(10):1140-5.
  33. MilsomJW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coil Surg. 1998;187:46-54.
  34. Nakajima K, Lee SW, Sonoda T, Milsom JW. Intraoperative carbon dioxide colonoscopy: a safe insufflation alternative for locating colonic lesions during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(3):321-5.
  35. Ng CSH, Whelan RL, Lacy AM, Yim AP. Is minimal access surgery for cancer associated with immunologic benefits? World J Surg. 2005;29(8):975-81.
  36. Olsen KO, Joelsson M, Laurberg S, Oresland T. Fertility after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in women with ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg. 1999;86:493.
  37. Ørding Olsen K, Juul S, Berndtsson I, Tom Oresland, Søren Laurberg. Ulcerative colitis: female fecundity before diagnosis, during disease, and after surgery compared with a population sample. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:15.
  38. Ortega AE, Beart RW Jr, Steele GD Jr, Winchester DP, Greene FL. Laparoscopic bowel surgery registry: preliminary results. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:681-5.
  39. Peters WR, Barrels TL. Minimally invasive colectomy: are the potential benefits realized? Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36: 751-6.
  40. Peters WR, Fleshman JW. Minimally invasive colectomy in elderly patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995;5:477-9.
  41. Reilly WT, Nelson H, Schroeder G, et al. Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(2):200-7.
  42. Reissman P, Agachan F, Wexner SD. Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in older patients. Am Surg. 1996;62:1060-3.
  43. Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mackeigan JM, Mazier WP. Open colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy: are there differences? Am Surg. 1993;59:549-53.
  44. Spivak H, Maele DV, Friedman I, Nussbaum M. Colorectal surgery in octogenarians. J Am Coil Surg. 1996;183:46-50.
  45. Stocchi L, Nelson H. Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: trial update. J Surg Oncol. 1998;68:255-67.
  46. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC; Colon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(7):477-84.
  47. Vukasin P, Ortega AE, Greene FL, Steele GD, Simons AJ, Anthone GJ, et al. Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection. Results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(10 Suppl):S20-3.
  48. Waljee A, Waljee J, Morris AM, Higgins PD. Threefold increased risk of infertility: a meta-analysis of infertility after ileal pouch anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2006;55:1575.
  49. Walsh TH. Audit of outcome of major surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg. 1996;83:92-7.
  50. Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S; Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. Short-term quality of life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2002;287(3):321-8.
  51. Whittle J, Steinberg EP, Anderson GF, Herbert R. Results of colectomy in elderly patients with colon cancer, based on Medicare claims data. Am J Surg. 1992;163:57245.
  52. Wise WE Jr, Padmanabhan A, Meesig DM, Arnold MW, Aguilar PS, Stewart WR. Abdominal colon and rectal operations in the elderly. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:959-63.
  53. Young-Fadok T, Radice E, Nelson H. Benefits of laparoscopic- assisted colectomy for colon polyps: a casematched series. [meeting abstract] Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:A47.