Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer patients: results of the PACS 01 economic study (original) (raw)

Cost Analysis Comparing an Anthracycline/Docetaxel Regimen to CMF in Patients with Early Stage Breast Cancer

Angela Ihbe-heffinger, Ulrike Nitz

Onkologie, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Cost-effectiveness analyses of docetaxel versus paclitaxel once weekly in patients with metastatic breast cancer in progression following anthracycline chemotherapy, in Spain

Miguel Casado

Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Cost effectiveness of TAC versus FAC in adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer

Shail Verma

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Cost Effectiveness of Treatment Options in Advanced Breast Cancer in the UK

Anita Burrell

PharmacoEconomics, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Cost-Effectiveness of Docetaxel and Paclitaxel for Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: Adaptation of a Model-Based Economic Evaluation From the United Kingdom to South Africa

Kim MacQuilkan

Value in Health Regional Issues

View PDFchevron_right

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide + methotrexate + fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer

Mitsuru Sasako

European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1996

View PDFchevron_right

The cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer: Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide in comparison with paclitaxel and gemcitabine

nahid hatam

Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

View PDFchevron_right

A Cost-Utility Analysis of Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Docetaxel versus Paclitaxel versus Vinorelbine

Robert Launois

Pharmacoeconomics, 1996

View PDFchevron_right

The cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: A comparison of no chemotherapy and first, second, and third generation regimens for patients with differing prognoses

Andrea Manca, Alastair Gray

European Journal of Cancer, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

An Economic Evaluation of Docetaxel and Paclitaxel Regimens in Metastatic Breast Cancer in the UK

Ágnes Benedict

PharmacoEconomics, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

A Cost-Utility Analysis of Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Robert Launois

PharmacoEconomics, 1996

View PDFchevron_right

Survival outcome and cost-effectiveness with docetaxel and paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a population-based evaluation

Thang Long Vu

Annals of Oncology, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

A cost-utility analysis comparing second-line chemotherapy schemes in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Ningfeng Li

Anti-Cancer Drugs, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

PCN12: Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Paclitaxel to Docetaxel in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer

Marvin Shepherd

Value in Health, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Cost-effectiveness of new guidelines for adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with primary breast cancer

G. van der Wilt

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Economic evaluation of taxane-based first-line chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer in Greece: an analysis alongside a multicenter, randomized phase III clinical trial

Vassilis Fragoulakis

Annals of Oncology, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

A Canadian economic analysis of U.S. Oncology Adjuvant Trial 9735

Shail Verma

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Cost-Utility of "Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide" versus "Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel" for Treatment of Patients with Breast Cancer in Iran

nahid hatam

Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the treatment of breast cancer

Vasiliki Tsiantou

ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

The Impact of Structural Uncertainty on Cost-Effectiveness Models for Adjuvant Endocrine Breast Cancer Treatments: the Need for Disease-Specific Model Standardization and Improved Guidance

Gerardus Frederix

PharmacoEconomics, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Comparison of clinical practice and cost of drugs in two cohorts of patients: 1994–1998 and 2003–2006

Bertrand Favier

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Personalized treatment of women with early breast cancer: a risk-group specific cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy accounting for companion prognostic tests OncotypeDX and Adjuvant!Online

Beate Jahn

BMC cancer, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole vs tamoxifen in adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United Kingdom: The 5-year completed treatment analysis of the ATAC ('Arimidex', Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial

Robert Mansel

2007

View PDFchevron_right

The cost of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma

Jeannine McCune

Cancer, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

An Italian cost-effectiveness analysis of paclitaxel albumin (nab-paclitaxel) versus conventional paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer patients: the COSTANza study

Andrea Botticelli, Elisa Martelli, Carlo Lazzaro

ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Docetaxel for the adjuvant treatment of early node-positive breast cancer: a single technology appraisal

J. Chilcott

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting for treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer

maryam ghiasipour

Cancer, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy

Susan Brunskill

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)

View PDFchevron_right

Cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: a model-based analysis of the HERA and FinHer trial

T. Szucs

Annals of Oncology, 2007

View PDFchevron_right