Enacting a Cycle of Inquiry Capstone Research Project in Doctoral-Level Leadership Preparation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Educational Renaissance, 2017
Educational practitioners in the 21st century must respond to the availability of a wide array of data relating to student outcomes and student achievement. To make effective use of this data as well as be able to respond to the growing needs of the field, educational practitioners must be able to apply the knowledge they gain in the graduate preparation programs. In this article, the authors reflect on the role of a signature pedagogy grounded on inquiry-based learning in their leadership development, and how an ongoing emphasis on action research throughout their doctoral program was invaluable in their professional and academic growth. As a result, the authors recommend that action research should strongly supplement traditional, theory-driven graduate pedagogy in education.
Implications of the 2011 U.S. Survey of Doctoral Education in Leadership Preparation
International Journal of Educational Reform, 2015
As the number of U.S. doctoral educational leadership programs and graduates has increased dramatically in recent years, there is not only more attention to the purpose, design, and assessment for degrees but also more criticisms over the lack of differentiation between the PhD and the EdD. A group of scholars analyzed the results of a survey of 103 U.S. institutions to examine current programs, and they found modest differences in preparation for the two types of doctorates but positive influences from current efforts to redesign the EdD for professional practice, particularly for the dissertation. The scholars call for further research on program design, the impetus and challenges of degree change, and attention to related issues of faculty and student diversity and the role of the field. This article summarizes these findings and draws further implications on the need for case studies and models of degree programs that are coherently redesigned around the different purposes of re...
2012
This article describes the process of replacing a modest Master's level school leader preparation program with an innovative Ed.D. program at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). The new doctoral program is intensive, highly selective, intellectually rigorous, and fieldbased. The authors provide side-by-side comparisons of the difference of each inquiry cycle which identified both problems and opportunities that led to the changes in the old program. The results, the characteristics of the doctoral program are shown by the authors to have addressed weaknesses of such leader preparation programs as identified in the research literature. Finally, the authors provide examples of specific data, such as student achievement data in schools led by UIC graduates, used in continually improving the program. In 2001, a small group of faculty members in the Department of Educational Policy Studies at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) challenged themselves by asking, "What would it take to consistently prepare urban school leaders to measurably improve student learning in highneed schools?" To answer this question and pursue the goal contained therein, we 1 embarked on a decade-long journey to improve the way we prepare school leaders at UIC. This article presents the story of the journey that has taken us from a modest Master's-level school leader preparation program to an intensive, highly selective, intellectually rigorous, field-based doctoral-level program-the Ed.D. Program in Urban Educational Leadership. As we made this journey, we gradually moved away from radical, episodic, albeit collaborative approaches to program reform that have long been advocated in the literature (Clark & Clark, 1997). Instead, we moved toward the regular use of data and cycles of inquiry to promote continuous improvement, an alternative approach more recently advocated for the improvement of leadership preparation (e.g, Bottoms, O'Neill, Fry, & Hill, 2003; Cheney & Davis, 2011; Orr, 2006). This move has proven crucial for us to engage in sustained program development and make notable progress toward the goal of consistently preparing urban school leaders to improve student learning in high-need schools. The story of the Ed.D. Program at UIC is of particular importance in light of public and scholarly attention to issues of school leadership preparation. This attention has spurred numerous critiques of leadership preparation (Barnett,
Focus and Delivery of Doctoral Programs in Educational Leadership
International Journal of Educational Reform, 2015
The purpose of this study was to present the current status of program focus and delivery of doctoral-level educational leadership programs in the United States. Drawing on a 2011 national survey of educational leadership doctoral programs in 103 institutions, this study describes the differences and similarities of EdD and PhD programs in two domains–-program focus (i.e., purposes, credit requirements, and curriculum emphases) and program delivery (i.e., use of cohort model, time, location, and face-to-face/online hybrid). In light of mixed findings, implications for practice and recommendations for further research are presented.
Leadership Development in Higher Education Programs
The Community College Enterprise, 2009
A doctorate is increasingly a credential for community college leaders, yet much remains unknown about the structure of doctoral programs and links between course requirements and practitioner needs. Programs awarding an Ed.D. more often focus on skill-oriented coursework, whereas Ph.D. programs have greater emphasis on research. This study creates a portrait of program structure that showcases a need to address how curriculum contributes to leadership development and the acquisition of key competencies. Introduction A key requirement for those seeking chief executive roles is a doctorate (McFarlin, Crittenden, & Ebbers, 1999; Townsend & Wiese, 1991); however, little is known about the structure of programs and links between what current and future leaders need to know. Community colleges are facing a leadership crisis with a projected wave of impending retirements (Shults, 2001; Weisman & Vaughan, 2007); thus, some of those in the pipeline for high-level positions are working towar...
Research Courses in Education Leadership Programs: Relevance in an Era
2016
Master's degree research course offerings of 72 university education leadership programs were examined to explore how relevant the courses were to the inquiry needs of practicing school leaders. Research course titles and descriptions were analyzed using content analysis. Findings revealed considerable variation in research course requirements, course titles, and course descriptions. Analysis of course descriptions indicated minimal emphasis on the research skills required for school improvement. Results also suggested a lack of consensus on the importance of developing research skills for school leaders across university education leadership programs. Implications for education leadership preparation programs are discussed with an emphasis on the need for further studies on the research skills required by practicing school leaders.
Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice
This paper describes the redesign of a community college executive leadership doctoral program that seeks to develop senior-level leaders. The paper provides how the redesign was intentionally aligned with the CPED principles and specifically the sixth principle. The paper sought data from students, faculty and other documents to gain an insight into the impact of aligning the program with principles and design concepts. The paper suggests that it is important for this program to integrate examples from practice and practitioners, include job shadowing experiences for students and faculty, and ensure there are active learning activities that are relevant to the students. The paper includes an overview of the program redesign as well as reflection on the first iteration of the new coursework through student's voice, faculty feedback, and a discussion of lessons learned.
2006
In an article on best practices, A. Douglas Eury and Vicky F. Ratchford support the theory that schools operate more effectively with shared decision-making based on research and their combined 16 years of leadership experience. The authors offer suggestions for principals to consider when working with school leadership teams. Their advice is broken up into several categories including establishing the vision, verifying the mission, belonging to the team, appropriately determining who makes the decisions, making sure the appropriate information is available, accurately interpreting and applying data, and accepting the responsibility of accountability.
The Doctoral Student Leadership Institute
Journal of Leadership Education, 2014
The purpose of this article is to describe the Doctoral Student Leadership Institute, an initiative developed to hone the leadership skills of doctoral students from a wide range of disciplines. The components of the Institute and preliminary assessment measures with findings are discussed. We particularly were pleased with the outcomes of the Fellows through examination of their leadership assessments (especially the portfolios), the evaluation of the leadership course, and their success with the community service project. We hope this article will inspire other institutions to be forward-thinking in how they can best meet the leadership needs of their current and future graduate students.